• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chicagoland: First lady campaigned at polling place?

soccerboy22 said:
And the fact that only one person out of everyone there she talked to said she told him how to vote convinces you she is guilty?
Click to expand...

On brave soul talking against the Obama's in Chicago. it will be amazing if nothing happens to him
 
TacticalEvilDan said:
Chicago politics being dirty only matters to ptif219 if that dirt suggests what he wants it to suggest.
Click to expand...

So decades of lies and dirty politics means the Obama's that came from this politics did nothing wrong.
JC-hysterical.gif
JC-ROFL.gif
 
ptif219 said:
On brave soul talking against the Obama's in Chicago. it will be amazing if nothing happens to him
Click to expand...

You are taking the word of ONE person that came out against some one who you don't like. Meanwhile not a single other person has come out and said the First Lady has done ANYTHING wrong. Do you honestly think if there was a story here that Fox wouldn't run with it?
 
soccerboy22 said:
You are taking the word of ONE person that came out against some one who you don't like. Meanwhile not a single other person has come out and said the First Lady has done ANYTHING wrong. Do you honestly think if there was a story here that Fox wouldn't run with it?
Click to expand...

Fox would if it were news. So are you saying Fox reports truth and facts?
 
ptif219 said:
Fox would if it were news. So are you saying Fox reports truth and facts?
Click to expand...

Not at all. What I am saying that if Fox could pin something bad on the Obamas they would. And since they haven't it just shows what a non story this is.
 
ptif219 said:
So opinions are lies?
Click to expand...

It's not an opinion when not only is there no conclusive supporting evidence, but in fact there's conclusive evidence in the opposite direction.

Well, I take that back. Maybe you're not lying. Maybe you're willfully behaving like an ignorant fool. Personally, I think you're lying.
 
soccerboy22 said:
Not at all. What I am saying that if Fox could pin something bad on the Obamas they would. And since they haven't it just shows what a non story this is.
Click to expand...

It shows they are fair and balanced
 
TacticalEvilDan said:
It's not an opinion when not only is there no conclusive supporting evidence, but in fact there's conclusive evidence in the opposite direction.

Well, I take that back. Maybe you're not lying. Maybe you're willfully behaving like an ignorant fool. Personally, I think you're lying.
Click to expand...

Not on this thread
 
TacticalEvilDan said:
History means an awful lot, but it's no substitute for fact when we're talking about the present.
Click to expand...

She knew better and should not have talked about her husband or the election. She pushed the the issue to the grey area. we know nothing will happen look at the panthers. If you are black it is ok if you break election laws
 
ptif219 said:
She knew better and should not have talked about her husband or the election. She pushed the the issue to the grey area. we know nothing will happen look at the panthers. If you are black it is ok if you break election laws
Click to expand...

It is unfortunate that you are so far-gone that everything you see is distorted through the lens of your political obsessions.
 
TacticalEvilDan said:
It is unfortunate that you are so far-gone that everything you see is distorted through the lens of your political obsessions.
Click to expand...

Not obsession but the knowledge of history. Remember this is the same women who was not proud of this country except when her husband ran for president
 
History not relevant to the discussion, except that you can't see that through the distortion generated by your obsession.
 
ptif219 said:
As I said fair and balanced
Click to expand...

No they aren't fair and balanced. An example of fair and balanced would have been them running the story and giving each side a chance to explain why she didn't or did break election law. Them not running the story isn't an example of it. It is an example of them being smart and not running a made up story by Drudge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom