• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House passes 9/11 Health & Compensation Act

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The House this afternoon passed final congressional approval of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health & Compensation Act, which provides medical care for persons exposed to harmful toxins from the 9/11 terrorist attacks. First responders, cleanup workers and those living within the terrorist attack areas are eligible for care.


The $7.4 billion bill passed easily 268 to 160. Seventeen Republicans supported the measure, while three Democrats voted against the bill.

As a fiscal Conservative, I am generally against Federal spending. But there also a few lines that I will cross, and support government spending. This is one of them. There are a lot of cops, firemen, and even ordinary citizens, who put their own lives on the line for this nation, and their community, when 911 hit. We don't throw them in the garbage after we are done with them. We reward their service to America, and treat any health problems they incur while doing it. Why? Because it is the right thing to do.

Yes, in this case, let's spend the money, and I will gladly pay my taxes for it.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:
As a fiscal Conservative, I am generally against Federal spending. But there also a few lines that I will cross, and support government spending. This is one of them. There are a lot of cops, firemen, and even ordinary citizens, who put their own lives on the line for this nation, and their community, when 911 hit. We don't throw them in the garbage after we are done with them. We reward their service to America, and treat any health problems they incur while doing it. Why? Because it is the right thing to do.

Yes, in this case, let's spend the money, and I will gladly pay my taxes for it.

Article is here.

Now for the otherside of the story, since your blog source just cheerleads.


Member Concerns



Some Members may be concerned about several issues:



H.R. 847 creates a new entitlement program.
H.R. 847 is paid for with a tax increase on companies located in the United States that are employing American workers.
H.R. 847 is not means tested. An amendment to preclude millionaires from accessing the new health entitlement created by Title I was defeated during the markup in Energy and Commerce Committee.
NIOSH does not have expertise in administering a health care payment program. The current program is a block-grant program, and under H.R. 847, NIOSH will negotiate contracts and approve treatment protocols.
H.R. 847 increases hospital reimbursement rates to 140 percent of Medicare reimbursement rates on average for New York City hospitals while ObamaCare cuts $150 billion in payments to hospitals around the country.
H.R. 847 does not reward hospitals and providers for improving health care. They will be reimbursed based on each service they perform, which will encourage overutilization and increase health care spending.
Currently, several programs receive federal funding for medical monitoring and treatment programs. Those programs include: Fire Department of New York WTC Medical Monitoring Program, New York/New Jersey WTC Consortium, WTC Health Registry, WTC Federal Responder Screening Program, Project COPE, and POPPA (Police Organization Providing Peer Assistance) program.
Limited oversight fails to ensure taxpayer funds are spent properly and effectively. Government health care programs, such as Medicare, have a significant amount of fraud.
H.R. 847 gives too much discretion in the unreviewable authority of the Special Master.
H.R. 847 permits claimants to seek compensation through the VCF even if they have settled their lawsuits against the $1 billion taxpayer-funded World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company.
H.R. 847 includes protections for trial lawyers, including the ability to receive taxpayer-funded compensation for work not directly related to recovery from the VCF. In addition, attorneys who have been compensation under another settlement will have access to settlement funds under the reopened VCF.
12. H.R. 847 extends the geographic scope of the original September 11 Fund and gives the Special Master discretion to extend it even farther.
H.R. 847 caps the VCF at $8.4 billion, which is an invitation and a guarantee to spend $8.4 billion.
H.R. 847: James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 - Legislative Digest - GOP.gov


You're a fiscal conservative unless it's an emotional issue... then you don't care, just spend spend spend!
 
Now for the otherside of the story, since your blog source just cheerleads.



H.R. 847: James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 - Legislative Digest - GOP.gov


You're a fiscal conservative unless it's an emotional issue... then you don't care, just spend spend spend!

Let's pretend the white house had an (R) and the congressional majority was (R), and some (D)'s voted against this bill.

I bet you'd be posting exactly the opposite. How dare those liberals vote against helping out our brave men and women who sacrificed so much on that day!

I'm with the OP. This is money worth spending. And the "tax increase" is closing loopholes that let corporations set up a P.O. box on some tax shelter island, thereby avoiding paying out ANY income taxes in the US.
 
Last edited:
Let's pretend the white house had an (R) and the congressional majority was (R), and some (D)'s voted against this bill.

I bet you'd be posting exactly the opposite. How dare those liberals vote against helping out our brave men and women who sacrificed so much on that day!

I'm with the OP. This is money worth spending. And the "tax increase" is closing loopholes that let corporations set up a P.O. box on some tax shelter island, thereby avoiding paying out ANY income taxes in the US.

Damn right, and this is for those who sacrificed for this country. Sucks to be one of those who would dare to play politics with the lives of our soldiers.

Thanx for posting.
 
As a fiscal Conservative, I am generally against Federal spending. But there also a few lines that I will cross, and support government spending. This is one of them. There are a lot of cops, firemen, and even ordinary citizens, who put their own lives on the line for this nation, and their community, when 911 hit. We don't throw them in the garbage after we are done with them. We reward their service to America, and treat any health problems they incur while doing it. Why? Because it is the right thing to do.

Yes, in this case, let's spend the money, and I will gladly pay my taxes for it.

Article is here.

iwo-9-11-final.jpg


I could not agree more with your sentiments.

We far too often forget our heroes that go to a different kind of war here at home every day and put their lives on the line for total strangers, you and I.

I wonder how many people remember that 343 Firefighters, 72 Police Officer, Heroes Died on 9 11.

I salute all of the heroes in uniform and those in hard hats and others who just joined in the effort because that is what true Americans and they didn't bitch that it's someone Else's job to do.

To Paraphrase Sir Winston Churchill: "If this Nation lasts a thousand years it will be said of these Heroes, this was their finest hour."

:2usflag: Salute
 
Let's pretend the white house had an (R) and the congressional majority was (R), and some (D)'s voted against this bill.

I bet you'd be posting exactly the opposite. How dare those liberals vote against helping out our brave men and women who sacrificed so much on that day!

I'm with the OP. This is money worth spending. And the "tax increase" is closing loopholes that let corporations set up a P.O. box on some tax shelter island, thereby avoiding paying out ANY income taxes in the US.

Some people are only conservatives when it suits their political argument at the time.

Terry Schavio? Nah, let the federal government get involved.
Military spending on weapons never to be used on terrorists? How DARE you stop use from spending the bank on useless tools.
Kicking gay linguist specialists out of the military despite a massive need for them? But they're homos!!!
 
iwo-9-11-final.jpg


I could not agree more with your sentiments.

We far too often forget our heroes that go to a different kind of war here at home every day and put their lives on the line for total strangers, you and I.

I wonder how many people remember that 343 Firefighters, 72 Police Officer, Heroes Died on 9 11.

I salute all of the heroes in uniform and those in hard hats and others who just joined in the effort because that is what true Americans and they didn't bitch that it's someone Else's job to do.

To Paraphrase Sir Winston Churchill: "If this Nation lasts a thousand years it will be said of these Heroes, this was their finest hour."

:2usflag: Salute

Thank you for your response. It is most appreciated. :)
 
Good, these hero's deserve it.
 
I see it as similar to giving benefits to veterans. They've earned it. Call it inconsistency all you want, but I there are few nobler things that I think that our government can spend money on.
 
Damn right, and this is for those who sacrificed for this country. Sucks to be one of those who would dare to play politics with the lives of our soldiers.

Thanx for posting.

Emotionalism meter at MAXIMUM!!!! Spare us ALL the self righteous faux outrage. This is crap, it over spends, has poor oversight and we cannot afford it. Thing is, Deuce has it wrong, if this was in reverse I.E. R's, you'd be the first to protest it as a waste of money and proof the GOP has fallen from Goldwater.

Neither I, nor those in the GOP that voted against this, have a problem with assisting and providing for those who served, we do however want it done responsibly.
 
As a certified member of Hazmat, I wonder where the experts were when all of these individuals were breathing that bad stuff. Supplying them with respirators and gas masks would have been the smart thing to do. Alas, hindsight is 20-20.

Since it happened the way that it did, I'm for helping these people to recover as much as they can.
 
There was no reason for masks, the Bush EPA was denying any problem with Manhattan air quality.
 
Back
Top Bottom