Page 34 of 39 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 389

Thread: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

  1. #331
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,740

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Not a fan of warning shots. Your warning was when I told you to leave.


    If I pull a gun, it's because I intend to use it.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  2. #332
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by ReverendHellh0und View Post
    Not a fan of warning shots. Your warning was when I told you to leave.


    If I pull a gun, it's because I intend to use it.

    Technically, a warning shot is using a gun.

    And as I said, there is debate on the use of warning shots. But there is no real debate with people who use firearms that if you point a gun at someone, the intent is to kill them with it, not wound them. If someone does not intend to kill a person, they have no business pointing a gun at that person. Ever. That shouldn't even be questioned, IMO.
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  3. #333
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,740

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Technically, a warning shot is using a gun.

    And as I said, there is debate on the use of warning shots. But there is no real debate with people who use firearms that if you point a gun at someone, the intent is to kill them with it, not wound them. If someone does not intend to kill a person, they have no business pointing a gun at that person. Ever. That shouldn't even be questioned, IMO.
    Not much of a warning in my case. it would be like telling somoene I will hit them as I'm smacking em across the face.


    We harp in training about only pointing the weapon at things you intend to destroy. We change the safety protocol to this and it seems to help set the mentality of the task.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  4. #334
    Farts in Elevators
    OscarB63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    09-06-14 @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,526

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    Technically, a warning shot is using a gun.

    And as I said, there is debate on the use of warning shots. But there is no real debate with people who use firearms that if you point a gun at someone, the intent is to kill them with it, not wound them. If someone does not intend to kill a person, they have no business pointing a gun at that person. Ever. That shouldn't even be questioned, IMO.

    bingo. warning shots were forbidden while I was in Iraq. the "warning shot" is showing them you are holding a weapon, if they don't back off you plug 'em.
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.

  5. #335
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    05-06-12 @ 11:12 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    9,800

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    I thought I already admitted I was mistaken.

    I was mistaken. Any chance we can cancel the rest of the posts informing me I was mistaken?

  6. #336
    Farts in Elevators
    OscarB63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    09-06-14 @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,526

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by BDBoop View Post
    I thought I already admitted I was mistaken.

    I was mistaken. Any chance we can cancel the rest of the posts informing me I was mistaken?
    FWIW...you were mistaken
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.

  7. #337
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by OscarB63 View Post
    bingo. warning shots were forbidden while I was in Iraq. the "warning shot" is showing them you are holding a weapon, if they don't back off you plug 'em.
    In situations where a person is likely to have a firearm of their own, a warning shot is a wasted bullet that will only get a firing response, IMO. BAsically, the liklihood is that a warning shot in these situations will receive a real shot in response, and thus warning shots should be forbidden.


    But in situations where the person is not likely to be in possesion of a firearm, the value of warning shots could exist. I wouldn't say that warnign shots have any value in a war zone like Iraq, and they should be forbidden in those situations.

    But this issue is a civilian with rocks being thrown at her house, which is a little different. But then the issue of a warning shot becomes the risk to bystanders in an urban environment.
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  8. #338
    Farts in Elevators
    OscarB63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    09-06-14 @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,526

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    In situations where a person is likely to have a firearm of their own, a warning shot is a wasted bullet that will only get a firing response, IMO. BAsically, the liklihood is that a warning shot in these situations will receive a real shot in response, and thus warning shots should be forbidden.


    But in situations where the person is not likely to be in possesion of a firearm, the value of warning shots could exist. I wouldn't say that warnign shots have any value in a war zone like Iraq, and they should be forbidden in those situations.

    But this issue is a civilian with rocks being thrown at her house, which is a little different. But then the issue of a warning shot becomes the risk to bystanders in an urban environment.
    ergo...warning shots should be forbidden. even if you shoot straight up into the air, the bullet has to come down somewhere and probably at a pretty decent terminal velocity.
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.

  9. #339
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,740

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by OscarB63 View Post
    ergo...warning shots should be forbidden. even if you shoot straight up into the air, the bullet has to come down somewhere and probably at a pretty decent terminal velocity.


    We used to have this problem in Albuquerque, the hispanic folk would shoot thier pistoles in the air at certain fiestas.... a flap would ensue.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  10. #340
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,740

    Re: good for her. old lady shoots punk kid

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    In situations where a person is likely to have a firearm of their own, a warning shot is a wasted bullet that will only get a firing response, IMO. BAsically, the liklihood is that a warning shot in these situations will receive a real shot in response, and thus warning shots should be forbidden.


    But in situations where the person is not likely to be in possesion of a firearm, the value of warning shots could exist. I wouldn't say that warnign shots have any value in a war zone like Iraq, and they should be forbidden in those situations.

    But this issue is a civilian with rocks being thrown at her house, which is a little different. But then the issue of a warning shot becomes the risk to bystanders in an urban environment.


    How are you sure the other person is not concealing his own firearm? If you brandish yours and he then continues to be an agressor, your spidey senses should be tingling.

    What if that warning shot "jams", etc.... You just dun gave up your upper hand.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

Page 34 of 39 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •