- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 787
- Reaction score
- 222
- Location
- USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Colbert's actions on The Hill served to illustrate and underscore how far gone the left is... and it probably doesn't register much with most leftists in the nation... but is sure does with the right.
This was epic... for all the wrong reasons.
Yes, many people think Colbert should not have been there while in character, if at all.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-workers-testimony-fails-amuse-lawmakers.html
Their little get together two days before the election... just became more of an irritant, only adds fuel to the fire of those fed up with how this country is being degraded by the leftists.
Bring... it... on... Colbert and Liebowitz (aka Stewart)... and thank you very much for the get out the vote rally for those sick of the elites in DC.
.
I'm curious to know your reasoning for using Stewart's less commonly used name. Do you call Sting "Gordon Sumner"? Or Bob Dylan "Robert Zimmerman"?
I'd also like to hear why people feel the need to call Obama "Barrack Hussein Obama" in casual conversations. Do they call Bush "George Walker Bush" in casual conversations? Or how about calling Reagan "Ronald Wilson Reagan"?
I have to admit people's use of Obama's full name, or your use of Stewart's technical name, in a conversation where it is unnecessary suggests to me a more mischievous intent. But I'll wait for a rebuttal.
Last edited: