Oh christ. Reread post 113. I already pointed out that this asinine bull**** doesn't help your cause.1. There is fertility regardless of whether or not there is marriage.
Good. Focus on that fact as the basis for SSM arguments. It's the only way to address the SSM opponents arguments effectively without falling prey to the poor debate choices I outlined in post 113.2. Same sex couples are not fertile but they can still raise children.
Reread post 113.3. If you want to make the argument that fertility is essential to having children that anyone can raise, then make that argument, not a weasel post.
Where the **** did you get the idea of "promote fertility"? It's about raising children. Fertility is simply the basis being used for the man + woman definition of marriage.4. If the state has an interest in using marriage to promote fertility, then it should deny infertile opposite sex couples that right.
DING! DING! DING! Arguments that indicate that this is the main impetus for seeking legalization of SSM will utterly destory the opposition's arguments. My entire point was to show that this is where the debate should be focussed.Promoting stable homes for children.