-Justice Breyer, McDONALD v. CHICAGOGiven the empirical and local value-laden nature of the questions that lie at the heart of the issue, why, in a Nation whose Constitution foresees democratic decisionmaking, is it so fundamental a matter as to require taking that power from the people? What is it here that the people did not know? What is it that a judge knows better?
Furthermore, what does a case on the Right to bear arms have to do with same sex marriage?
Last edited by CriticalThought; 08-11-10 at 03:25 PM.
1.) He was Appointed by Roland Regan, and was rejected by the Democrats for being too conservative.
2.) He was nominated again by George W Bush, but this time was able to serve for s chief judge of the Northern District of California.
To say, that he is biased because he is gay is a insult to his character as a Judge. It's basically saying, any judge that makes a ruling in favor of the gay population must be gay because it inverters with my thoughts about what morals are is just freaking insane.
Last edited by RyrineaHaruno; 08-11-10 at 08:52 PM.