Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Conte

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

jallman said:

Totally agree with you on this one. It does stand to mention that there is a huge distinction between bat**** crazy holocaust denial, a la Ahmedemontard, and those who study the event in detail looking for discrepancies between the hype and what actually can be proven. In fact, I don't consider a healthy skepticism to be actual holocaust denial but clearly, from reading this thread, others are quick to say otherwise.

Click to expand...

I agree with this, I have stated before in this thread that I have no problem with someone reviewing history because they have a logical reason in believing that something we know about the Holocaust may be false. However, I feel these people are few in number, and most who want to revise history do so from an ideological standpoint.

I can appreciate that sentiment. I think it's important to talk about all the groups that were slaughtered when it comes to the Holocaust. I guess it just bugs me that the Jews have taken it upon themselves to monopolize an issue that wasn't just about them. I think that insensitivity on their parts adds to the growing anti-Jewish sentiment world wide. And the Israel problem certainly does them no favors either.

Click to expand...

I can understand this, and I agree with you that the Jewish focus may make others from other groups angry or upset to see that the deaths of their ancestors/members of that group were killed as well. I think it is more historically relevant to the Jewish people as they were the primary targets, but when teaching about the Holocaust they should include the other targeted and victimized groups. The non-Jewish deaths should not be ignored or forgotten. On my state's capitol hill, there are 6 cedar trees that represent the 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust. That was an atrocity and I respect what my state is doing, but I also feel they should include another one in order to remember the lives of non-Jews who were killed. I don't think deaths should deserve special treatment simply because of the racial/religious group someone belonged to while they were living.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Laila said:

I find it interesting that people believe that by learning about the Holocaust. Humans will be more quick to act against another genocide. There has been genocides after the Holocaust and I still see Europe sitting on its hand. The holocaust teaching has had little impact in that respect.

Click to expand...

Probably because we're still too busy fluffing the Jews over their holocaust to even think to look at the ones going on around us now.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

jallman said:

Probably because we're still too busy fluffing the Jews over their holocaust to even think to look at the ones going on around us now.

Click to expand...

Ofc humans will still stand by another genocide
The Holocaust is so important in the world because it occurred in Europe. Because it occurred in the enlightened West.
If 6 million Africans died, no one would care imo

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

jallman said:

Well, they kinda are...

Click to expand...

They live in terrible conditions, but they aren't a target for extermination and they are in that situation not because they are being oppressed, but because they have an oppressive government. There are far worse places around the world. Haiti is a good example. I went to Haiti on a mission trip in the summer of 2007. Before the earthquake pretty much no one new that Haiti existed. Haiti is the poorest country in the western hemisphere, and their living conditions are worse than the Palestinians in Gaza. Are they also victims of a Holocaust?

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Laila said:

Ofc humans will still stand by another genocide
The Holocaust is so important in the world because it occurred in Europe. Because it occurred in the enlightened West.
If 6 million Africans died, no one would care imo

Click to expand...

I think it's time to break out this post again:

Dav said:

I've pointed this out earlier on the thread, but it bears repeating: the Jews are not working harder than any other group to stress the horror their people went through. They're just the most successful, for a number of reasons:
-The purpetrator, Germany, is now on their side. Contrast this with, say, the Armenians, whose unwavering attempts to make more known that about two-thirds of them were slaughtered by the Turks, the Turkish lobby continues to do all it can to defy.
-The sheer number of them that died. By a huge margin they suffered the worst genocide of all time, and by an even larger margin they were the largest group that Hitler put to death.
-Hitler was already widely considered a monstrous figure before the Holocaust was even widely known. It's much easier to notice a mass killing when it's done by someone you already hate to begin with.

[...]

As I already said, when people don't know or don't care about history, it is doomed to repeat itself. Before the Holocaust, genocides went mostly ignored and unnoticed; now, though they still happen, they are recognized for the monstrosity that they are. It's at least a step forwards.
You seem to think it's all about "unrelated agendas", whatever those are... but it's just not. Maybe for some people, but most - even the ones who do try to use it to advance such agendas - just want to make sure everyone recognizes it for what it is... which might help the world move towards an environment where it can never happen again.

Click to expand...

Since nobody seemed to notice the first time, even though both points keep coming up.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Stone is an interesting filmmaker, too. He's made a valuable contribution to public discourse on a number of topics. It's no mark against him that he's inspired some hatred and ridicule in the process.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Shayah said:

I never bring up the Holocaust on this board. I’ll sometimes respond with a post in an existing thread such as this. I don’t beat anyone over the head about it, and neither do any of the other Jews on this board.

Click to expand...

You may not. Others certainly do.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Laila said:

Ofc humans will still stand by another genocide
The Holocaust is so important in the world because it occurred in Europe. Because it occurred in the enlightened West.
If 6 million Africans died tomorrow, no one would care imo

Click to expand...

I know I wouldn't. :shrug: Hell, I find it hard to make myself care about what happened in Europe. And I know I wouldn't even bat an eye if it were to happen next door to me in Mexico, though I probably would find myself outraged if I saw something like this going on in Canada.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Dav said:

I think it's time to break out this post again:

Since nobody seemed to notice the first time, even though both points keep coming up.

Click to expand...

Yes I did miss it.
And I'm still desensitized to the Holocaust. Even after watching the documentary.

If success of "never again" is accepting genocides will continue happen but now at least we acknowledge it is genocide instead ignoring it. That is failure to me.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

jallman said:

I know I wouldn't. :shrug: Hell, I find it hard to make myself care about what happened in Europe. And I know I wouldn't even bat an eye if it were to happen next door to me in Mexico, though I probably would find myself outraged if I saw something like this going on in Canada.

Click to expand...

Exactly, despite all the Holocaust teaching. I'm sure others feel the same.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

digsbe said:

They live in terrible conditions, but they aren't a target for extermination and they are in that situation not because they are being oppressed, but because they have an oppressive government. There are far worse places around the world. Haiti is a good example. I went to Haiti on a mission trip in the summer of 2007. Before the earthquake pretty much no one new that Haiti existed. Haiti is the poorest country in the western hemisphere, and their living conditions are worse than the Palestinians in Gaza. Are they also victims of a Holocaust?

Click to expand...

Is there an oppressive neighboring regime cutting their supplies to commodities, dropping cluster bombs on their playgrounds, racing tanks up and down their streets, throwing them off their farms, etc?

My point is that while "Holocaust" may be a bit of a hyperbole, it does relate the relevant imagery: jackbooted thugs coming in the night to kill and murder the common citizenry of a people.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

jallman said:

Is there an oppressive neighboring regime cutting their supplies to commodities, dropping cluster bombs on their playgrounds, racing tanks up and down their streets, throwing them off their farms, etc?

Click to expand...

No, they just live under corrupt rulers that screw the people and flee the country after 1 term. Israel is not an oppressive neighboring regime, the Hamas controlled Gaza Strip is. Don't forget that Egypt also has a wall around Gaza and a checkpoint to enter the country just as Israel does. Israel gives much aid to Gaza. The reason why they have the wall, have border checkpoints, and preform defensive military actions in the Strip is because it is currently government by the insane Hamas terrorist group. This group encourages children to kill Jews, to die the martyrs death in suicide attacks. They themselves rob the Palestinians of aid and murder those who disagree with them. Their primary goal is to destroy Israel and take the entire nation (and the Fatah controlled West Bank) to be their nation. Israel is hit by rockets from Hamas, and many border cities are forced to have bomb shelters due to the rocket fire.

My point is that while "Holocaust" may be a bit of a hyperbole, it does relate the relevant imagery: jackbooted thugs coming in the night to kill and murder the common citizenry of a people.

Click to expand...

I agree that it doesn't relate to relevant imagery. My point was that the Jews are not the only one who use the Holocaust to defend Israel. Many Palestinians and anti-Israeli groups advocate that there is a Palestinian Holocaust and they abuse it too.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Apocalypse said:

I nearly fell of my chair.

Saying that a specific ethnicity/race are "controlling the media" is pretty much preaching on a conspiracy theory, you are saying that there are a group of people united by their Jewish background who conspirate together to control and manipulate the media.

Click to expand...

Ok, for one I'm pretty sure conspirate isn't a word. For another saying a group controls something does not in any way suggest a conspiracy.

As I said that's the definition of the term.
Denial is indeed the refusal to recognize the existence of something, and in this case the existence of the fact that 5-6 million Jews have been systematically excecuted by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

Click to expand...

Except it is not considered a fact, but an estimate.

So he has overestimated the figures of one camp, that doesn't mean that he didn't underestimate the figures on other areas, and you give no further indication of overestimates of his on the rest of the death toll.

Click to expand...

Well, I'm finding it difficult to find his estimates regarding the other camps. As far as indications the figures on killings by the Einsatzgruppen vary, but it seems this was also likely overestimated. There is no indication that he underestimated the toll.

Nevertheless the different estimations vary from 5.1 million to 5.9 million, and the generally accepted figure by historians was and is 5.9 million, and not Raul's figure of 5.1 million.

Click to expand...

There is not much in the way of a generally-accepted figure. Most who show 6 million go with census adjustments that are really poor methods.

It said systematically, yes, but all those who were killed in the gas chambers were executed systematically, so I don't see your point.

Click to expand...

I believe the point was that they were the only other group singled out for destruction.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Demon of Light said:

Ok, for one I'm pretty sure conspirate isn't a word. For another saying a group controls something does not in any way suggest a conspiracy.

Click to expand...

Conspire would be the word I was looking for, yes.
However claiming that a single ethnicity/race is in control of something like the media is indeed a conspiracy theory.
It was one of the main anti-Semitic claims coming from the Nazis at their times, that Jews are controlling great parts of the media, the banking system etc. and that Jews have used this control to betray the German Empire during the first world war, and that this was the reason for the German defeat.

Except it is not considered a fact, but an estimate.

Click to expand...

It is the most accurate estimate according to the majority of the historians, of course the figure would probably not be deadly accurate, hence the statement that the figure is "just under six million".

Well, I'm finding it difficult to find his estimates regarding the other camps. As far as indications the figures on killings by the Einsatzgruppen vary, but it seems this was also likely overestimated. There is no indication that he underestimated the toll.

There is not much in the way of a generally-accepted figure. Most who show 6 million go with census adjustments that are really poor methods.

Click to expand...

Why would it seem like "this was also likely overestimated"? What's your basis?
And no, there are clearly indications that his toll was underestimated. After all there's a reason why his is the lowest estimation.

I believe the point was that they were the only other group singled out for destruction.

Click to expand...

Yes, destruction by the gas chambers.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Winston Smith said:

Stone is an interesting filmmaker, too. He's made a valuable contribution to public discourse on a number of topics. It's no mark against him that he's inspired some hatred and ridicule in the process.

Click to expand...

It's a mark against him that he's a Jew hating POS conspiracy theorist who is probably the single biggest reason why so many people don't believe a radical communist former marine sharp shooter didn't kill JFK despite all the evidence pointing directly to him.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

RyrineaHaruno said:

Meh I've really not heard much about him, since I am not old enough to know who he is. The Elders of Zion thing is crap, and this is coming from a Conspiracy Theorist. Anyone who believes that crap are to lazy to do research on that subject, and see it was faked by a bunch of racist.



So he is one of those people that think Jews control America, or does he thinks they control world events. :lamo

Click to expand...

I thought it was the Freemason's that controlled America and world events. LOL!!

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Demon of Light said:

I actually pretty clearly pointed out how three of the major media companies in this country were run or owned by Jews and how the same applied for two of the most influential newspapers in the U.S. as well. From 1996 to 2009 a Jew was also in charge of Fox, also holding one of the most powerful positions in News Corporation in general, but I decided to only go with current leaders.

Click to expand...

You proved absolutely **** all dick, you pointed to three media companies and said hey there's some Jews working in high level positions there. What I want is a peer reviewed statistical analysis demonstrating a disproportionate representation of Jews in high ranking media positions, if you do not provide me with this information then it is safe to assume that you are completely FOS and doing nothing but regurgetating anti-semitic Nazi propaganda which states that JOOS control the media. Here's how empirical analysis works, first you must come up with a set of parameters IE what constitutes a "high ranking position within the media," then make a list of all the people filling those positions in say the 3 major 24 hour news networks along with the largest non-cable networks CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox, and the ten leading newspapers in the U.S., then determine their ethnicity, then cross reference that with the population statistics for the country as a whole, that is the only way to determine if Jews have a disproportionate representation in "high ranking media positions," in the country, and until those statistics are provided you can just STFU. How about that?

I didn't say I agree with it, only stating it as the reality. Unfortunately, most people do agree with it.

Click to expand...

You are making an assumption according to you Jews are pre-ordained to look out for other Jews. And by "look out for their own" what exactly do you mean by that? I'm guessing what you really mean is the Jews look out for Israel.

The SA as a whole was more inclined towards the socialist side of the party.

Click to expand...

On what do you base this on? It had nothing to do with them being more socialist and everything to do with them being a rival to the army and the SS.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Winston Smith said:

Stone is an interesting filmmaker, too. He's made a valuable contribution to public discourse on a number of topics. It's no mark against him that he's inspired some hatred and ridicule in the process.

Click to expand...

That is by far the single dumbest thing anyone can say about Stone. Anyone who knows a lick about history likes to puke at his work.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Apocalypse said:

However claiming that a single ethnicity/race is in control of something like the media is indeed a conspiracy theory.

Click to expand...

How is it a conspiracy theory? A necessary part of any conspiracy theory is that there is an alleged conspiracy. Simply saying a specific ethnic group controls an industry is not the same as alleging a conspiracy.

It was one of the main anti-Semitic claims coming from the Nazis at their times, that Jews are controlling great parts of the media, the banking system etc. and that Jews have used this control to betray the German Empire during the first world war, and that this was the reason for the German defeat.

Click to expand...

You see the second part is important. There is the assumption that Jews conspire to use their influence to achieve some specific plan that is a uniquely Jewish plan.

It is the most accurate estimate according to the majority of the historians, of course the figure would probably not be deadly accurate, hence the statement that the figure is "just under six million".

Click to expand...

I know a lot of historians use this estimate, but as I noted the method used is unreliable.

Why would it seem like "this was also likely overestimated"? What's your basis?

Click to expand...

Most figures I've seen are less than the 1.4 million attributed to him and include non-Jews in the tally. There is also the Korherr report which seems to mention just 633,000 Jews killed by the Einsatzgruppen by 1943 in the Soviet areas, where their operations were most focused, around the time they pretty much stopped operating.

And no, there are clearly indications that his toll was underestimated. After all there's a reason why his is the lowest estimation.

Click to expand...

What are these clear indications? As far as the reason I've told you several times where the higher figures are coming from.

Yes, destruction by the gas chambers.

Click to expand...

The fact of the matter is that many groups other than Jews and Romani were gassed. While the wording of the article you cited obviously confused you it did not challenge this fact.

Agent Ferris said:

You proved absolutely **** all dick, you pointed to three media companies and said hey there's some Jews working in high level positions there. What I want is a peer reviewed statistical analysis demonstrating a disproportionate representation of Jews in high ranking media positions, if you do not provide me with this information then it is safe to assume that you are completely FOS and doing nothing but regurgetating anti-semitic Nazi propaganda which states that JOOS control the media. Here's how empirical analysis works, first you must come up with a set of parameters IE what constitutes a "high ranking position within the media," then make a list of all the people filling those positions in say the 3 major 24 hour news networks along with the largest non-cable networks CBS, NBC, ABC, and Fox, and the ten leading newspapers in the U.S., then determine their ethnicity, then cross reference that with the population statistics for the country as a whole, that is the only way to determine if Jews have a disproportionate representation in "high ranking media positions," in the country, and until those statistics are provided you can just STFU. How about that?

Click to expand...

First ya' need to simmah down chile. Second most would generally see the CEO of a company as the most important position, not to mention actually owning the companies is a big deal. As far as disproportionate, there are any number of sources that will attest to this fact not just in media, but in the corporate world altogether. I don't think I have to hold your hand just because you want little percentiles rather than real people who own and/or run real media corporations.

Also, I included two of the most influential newspapers so it is more than what you are saying.

You are making an assumption according to you Jews are pre-ordained to look out for other Jews. And by "look out for their own" what exactly do you mean by that? I'm guessing what you really mean is the Jews look out for Israel.

Click to expand...

I am saying that people tend to support their own ethnic group first. This is just a tendency among people to help their own. As far as what it means it can mean giving them positions they might not normally get, giving them financial aid they might not normally get, or using their influence to support a cause shared by their people.

On what do you base this on? It had nothing to do with them being more socialist and everything to do with them being a rival to the army and the SS.

Click to expand...

The business community wanted the SA gone for its socialist leanings and most notably is that during the Knight of Long Knives Gregor Strasser, who was not then part of the SA and a notable leader of the left-wing, was killed as well. Reports about Rohm aligning with Strasser supposedly played a major factor in Hitler's decision to initiate the purge.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Laila said:

Ofc humans will still stand by another genocide
The Holocaust is so important in the world because it occurred in Europe. Because it occurred in the enlightened West.
If 6 million Africans died, no one would care imo

Click to expand...

Interesting point.

And ONLY because of Israel demonization and antisemitism could a teen getting killed 6000 miles away, or a family evicted the same distance, be significant 'International News' headlines/Or strings here or even in the violent Middle East... or there be a Flotilla to a place where NO one was 'starving'.... or Scores of BS UN resolutions.

It's only because the 'villains' are J..... Israel.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Winston Smith said:

Stone is an interesting filmmaker, too. He's made a valuable contribution to public discourse on a number of topics. It's no mark against him that he's inspired some hatred and ridicule in the process.

Click to expand...

Fiddytree said:

That is by far the single dumbest thing anyone can say about Stone. Anyone who knows a lick about history likes to puke at his work.

Click to expand...

Quite Right Fiddytree.
Stone is an Empty Jerkoff.
He's not even made coherent conspiracy films.. rather nefarious innuendo ones shedding No light and appealing to the LCD/Lowest Common Denominator/Professional Wrestling crowd.
Now going for the balance of the large but stupid group that frequents whatreallyhappened.com, Rense.com, etc.
Anyone now defending him discredits themselves... and does so of ignorance or merely to support this latest attack on Jews.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

CaptainCourtesy said:

Actually, I could very easily and have done so on at least 3 occasions at DP in the past. However, you and I both know that you would refuse to accept facts of this nature because they oppose your rigid and invalid view of things.

Click to expand...

Post your facts. Let's duke it out. I think you know as well as I do, that you'll end up looking foolish.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Captain America said:

I thought it was the Freemason's that controlled America and world events. LOL!!

Click to expand...

Extremist think they are linked with the Freemason xd. Then they claim the Elder of Zion crap is real when it was faked, and plagiarized by a bunch of racist. Freemasonry is kind of cool I think, but do I think they control the American way of life hell naw. As I have stated, before in this thread they are to lazy to do research in too a subject. Now do government conspiracy happen? You bet your ass they do.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Demon of Light said:

First ya' need to simmah down chile. Second most would generally see the CEO of a company as the most important position, not to mention actually owning the companies is a big deal. As far as disproportionate, there are any number of sources that will attest to this fact not just in media, but in the corporate world altogether. I don't think I have to hold your hand just because you want little percentiles rather than real people who own and/or run real media corporations.

Click to expand...

So CEO's and Owners are the parameters then?

K, this isn't that hard sport.

I will use the parameters of CEO's and Owners of the companies, as my sample population I will use the 3 major 24 hour cable news networks (Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC) and the 4 largest broadcast television networks (CBS, NBC, Fox, and ABC) along with the 10 leading U.S. newspapers which are from highest to lowest, USA Today, The Wallstreet Journal, the New York Times, the LA Times, The Washington Post, the New York Daily News, The Chicago Tribune, The New York Post, Long Island Newsday, and The Houston Chronicle.

CBS is currently owned by CBS Corporation, the CEO of CBS is Lesley Moonves, he is Jewish:

Les Moonves

Both NBC and MSNBC are currently owned by GE the CEO of GE is Jeffrey R. Immelt, he is white:

Jeffrey R. Immelt

Fox News is a subsidiary of News Corp the CEO of which is Rupert Murdoch, he is not Jewish, he is white and Christian:

Rupert Murdoch

ABC is currently owned by The Walt Disney Company the CEO of which is Robert Iger, he is white:

Robert Iger

Your article from the open source wikipedia claims that he is Jewish but the link provided in the citation section breaks, this article claims he is white.

CNN is currently owned by Time Warner Inc. the CEO of which is Jeffrey L. Bewkes he is white:

Jeffrey L. Bewkes

Now on to newspapers.

USA Today is owned by Gannet Company the CEO of which is Craig A. Dubow he is white:

Craig A. Dubow

The Wallstreet Journal is a subsidiary of Newscorp owned by the non-Jew Rupert Murdoch (I won't be counting people twice).

The New York Times is owned by the New York Times Company, of which the Chairman of the Board is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr he is White Anglican/Episcopalian:

Arthur Sulzberger, Jr.

You claimed he was a Jew so now we're probably going to have to settle on another set of parameters IE how are you classifying someone as Jewish? Are you using the Nuremberg Laws which defined a Jew as someone as having 3-4 Jewish grandparents?

The LA Times is owned by the Tribune Company which was recently bought by Sam Zell, he is Jewish:

Samuel Zell

The Washington Post is owned by the Washington Post Company the CEO of which is Donald E. Graham he is white:

Donald E. Graham

The New York Daily News is owned and operated by Mortimer Zuckerman this article labels him white but I'm fairly sure that he is Jewish:

Mort Zuckerman

The Chicago Tribune is owned by owned by Tribune (again I won't be counting people twice).

The New York Post is a subsidiary of Newscorp.

The Long Island Newday is owned by Tribune.

The Houston Chronicle is owned by the Hearst Corporation, the CEO of which is Frank A. Bennack, Jr. he is White:

Frank A. Bennack, Jr.


O.K. now that wasn't very difficult at all. 3 out of 12 are definately Jewish, that's 25% which is high considering that Jews only make up 2% of the overall population, however, most of these companies are headquartered in New York City and New York City has a 20% Jewish population in fact 1/3 of the entire Jewish population of the U.S. live in NYC.

Also, I included two of the most influential newspapers so it is more than what you are saying.

Click to expand...

lol you went back to grandparents to determine Jewish ethnicity, even the Nazi's used 3-4 Jewish grandparents, apparently you only need one Jewish grandparent for the grandchild to be considered Jewish. Look if you want to play that game I'm sure we could go back long enough in just about anyone's lineage to find some Jewish heritage.

I am saying that people tend to support their own ethnic group first.

Click to expand...

Obama has a Muslim father, are you suggesting that Obama supports Muslims over Jews?

This is just a tendency among people to help their own.

Click to expand...

So you see people in terms of tribes rather than as individuals. :roll:

As far as what it means it can mean giving them positions they might not normally get, giving them financial aid they might not normally get, or using their influence to support a cause shared by their people.

Click to expand...

Let me guess, like supporting Israel?

The business community wanted the SA gone for its socialist leanings and most notably is that during the Knight of Long Knives Gregor Strasser, who was not then part of the SA and a notable leader of the left-wing, was killed as well. Reports about Rohm aligning with Strasser supposedly played a major factor in Hitler's decision to initiate the purge.

Click to expand...

Strasser united with Schleicher not Rohm. The main reason why the Night of the Long Knives occurred was because the German military wanted Rohm gone because Rohm wanted to absorb the German Military into the SA eliminating the aristocratic leadership and putting the reigns of power into his own hands, that and the independence of the SA constituted a direct threat to Hitler's total consolidation of power. There was no room for Rohm in Hitler's Germany.

Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C

Agent Ferris said:

Jews were the single largest minority group singled out by the Nazi's for complete extermination. They bore the brunt of Nazi atrocities.

Click to expand...

And thanks to communism Eurasia didn't befall the same fate + enslavement. Also, 30 million or so Russians died to Nazism I dont know which brunt is bigger the 6 million or 30 million...

Prove that there is a greater Jewish representation in the media than any other ethnicity. And if there is are you suggesting that Jews as a people somehow act any differently from gentiles?

Click to expand...

Well they must otherwise there wouldn't be a delineation between the two. Anyways. Theres plenty of organizations who basically place pressure on media such as the anti-defamation league. There are tons of organizations just like it and more of them are Jewish really than any other. I used to have a list somewhere.... hrrm where did it go. Also a disproportionate 20% of the news media in the US have been raised in jewish households. Its in my old posts somewhere.