- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,095
- Reaction score
- 1,544
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C
Silly goober, you don't need to control all the businesses to control the industry. Most of the major news channels and newspapers are controlled by Jews and many of the others take their cues from those channels and newspapers. By extension Jews in effect control the media.
Also, there is nothing racist about stating something factual especially when it doesn't concern a race. While there is a distinct genetic group that corresponds to the Jewish population this does not make them a race.
Oliver Stone is correct to say Jews control the media and that, as a result, certain things are suppressed because ultimately many Jews are quite offended by any attempt to humanize Hitler or, as they see it, trivialize the Holocaust.
Raul Hilberg's Destruction of the European Jews estimated 5.1 million and while it was seen as a conservative estimate documentation has been found showing even his estimates for deaths inside some of the camps were substantially higher than the actual number of deaths. Many citing a figure closer to 6 million use the census and a bunch of other fuddly-duddly methods that have proven to be terribly inaccurate.
So more than 4 million and less than 5 million is saying the Holocaust didn't happen?
You and I both know the Holocaust has and will be brought up in any justification for war.
I never said it shouldn't, but we can certainly avoid using it to advance unrelated political and military agendas today.
That is patently false. Gas chambers were used in the euthanasia campaign as well as being used against Poles and Soviet POWs. While there was no immediate intent to exterminate Poles and other Slavs the intention was definitely to wipe out these populations as well, however they were much larger populations and thus it would have required more time or substantially more infrastructure.
It makes a difference if you want to be accurate. Plus any exaggeration should be discouraged.
Except Iran has no intent to initiate a nuclear war as this would end their government. Rather their desire is to have a deterrent that shields them from Israeli or U.S. military action. Talk of a second Holocaust is just a nice little way to get the proles running scared to their governments for protection.
To imply that a single race controls all of the news outlets is a racist statement, and that's factually evident.
Silly goober, you don't need to control all the businesses to control the industry. Most of the major news channels and newspapers are controlled by Jews and many of the others take their cues from those channels and newspapers. By extension Jews in effect control the media.
Also, there is nothing racist about stating something factual especially when it doesn't concern a race. While there is a distinct genetic group that corresponds to the Jewish population this does not make them a race.
Oliver Stone is correct to say Jews control the media and that, as a result, certain things are suppressed because ultimately many Jews are quite offended by any attempt to humanize Hitler or, as they see it, trivialize the Holocaust.
Wrong, the figure is just a bit under 6 million, around 5.9 million.
Raul Hilberg's Destruction of the European Jews estimated 5.1 million and while it was seen as a conservative estimate documentation has been found showing even his estimates for deaths inside some of the camps were substantially higher than the actual number of deaths. Many citing a figure closer to 6 million use the census and a bunch of other fuddly-duddly methods that have proven to be terribly inaccurate.
The claim that fewer Jews have perished is a claim that is identified with holocaust denial, and a claim that of course has no scientific or factual basis.
So more than 4 million and less than 5 million is saying the Holocaust didn't happen?
Such attack would be justified with the Iranian leadership's statements and steps towards a nuclear bomb and not with the Holocaust.
You and I both know the Holocaust has and will be brought up in any justification for war.
There is absolutely no logical reasoning behind your claim that the Holocaust should not be memorized and remembered.
I never said it shouldn't, but we can certainly avoid using it to advance unrelated political and military agendas today.
Actually, the only other group that the Nazis have killed in the gas chambers besides the Jews are the Gypsies.
That is patently false. Gas chambers were used in the euthanasia campaign as well as being used against Poles and Soviet POWs. While there was no immediate intent to exterminate Poles and other Slavs the intention was definitely to wipe out these populations as well, however they were much larger populations and thus it would have required more time or substantially more infrastructure.
I don't see how that makes any difference. Were it just 5'000, it wouldn't change anything. It wouldn't make their extermination any less inexcusable.
It makes a difference if you want to be accurate. Plus any exaggeration should be discouraged.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Had the world known in advance that Hitler's plan was to exterminate a whole generation of Jews, would it have been wrong to thwart that plan with a preemptive attack on Germany before the really ugly stuff even started? Similarly, if it becomes clear that Iran would initiate a nuclear war with Israel, wouldn't the sensible thing to do be to try and stop it from happening?
Except Iran has no intent to initiate a nuclear war as this would end their government. Rather their desire is to have a deterrent that shields them from Israeli or U.S. military action. Talk of a second Holocaust is just a nice little way to get the proles running scared to their governments for protection.