Winston Smith
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 915
- Reaction score
- 204
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in C
No, it doesn't.
I don't really want to get into the assassination theories since the thread is about Stone, not Kennedy. But the committee also cited eyewitness testimony and connections between Oswald and Ruby as factors. Their conclusion that the CIA was not involved was based on certain assumptions about the agency's cooperation, which the counsel later repudiated after learning of information that they had concealed.
Stone's film is a theory or set of theories based on limited information. I'm sure not everything in it is accurate, but the hysterical reaction was unwarranted. As an accuser, he ought to get some leeway when the accused conceals evidence. His skepticism was both patriotic and useful, unless one had something to hide or was just instinctively afraid of the truth.
The article states that more people believe the conspiracy bull**** because of the film.
No, it doesn't.
Agent Ferris said:Most conspiracists you'll find these days will take their cues directly from the film exhibit A) Ryhine promoting the "magic bullet" lie. There was nothing magic about this bullet as computer animation proves conclusively that it was a straight trajectory from the Oswald perch when the layout of the jumpseats are taken into account IE Connally's seat was dropped Kennedy's was raised and Connally's was pushed slightly towards the intererior and Connally was shifted slightly towards the right.
There was no other evidence the House Select Committee relied ENTIRELY on the acoustic analysis to make their determination that there was a 2nd gunman and thus a conspiracy rather than a loan assassin.
Bugliosi proved it beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt.
About what? Lied to them about what?
The film was a hodge podge of revisionist conspiracist bull**** passed off as a docu-drama. It was a work of pure fiction which Stone tried to pass off as fact.
I don't really want to get into the assassination theories since the thread is about Stone, not Kennedy. But the committee also cited eyewitness testimony and connections between Oswald and Ruby as factors. Their conclusion that the CIA was not involved was based on certain assumptions about the agency's cooperation, which the counsel later repudiated after learning of information that they had concealed.
Stone's film is a theory or set of theories based on limited information. I'm sure not everything in it is accurate, but the hysterical reaction was unwarranted. As an accuser, he ought to get some leeway when the accused conceals evidence. His skepticism was both patriotic and useful, unless one had something to hide or was just instinctively afraid of the truth.