• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Glenn Beck launches online University

Councilman said:
I challenge the Liberals and Others who call names and claim What Glenn says is propaganda to come up with specific items where he got it wrong, and not use the Alensky

I was impressed when Beck joined me in his realization that Obama was a Socialist/Marxist and he continues to get it right on target pointing out two things Liberals can't deal with, FACTS & the TRUTH.

It is beyond the ability of Leftists to deal in reality.
Click to expand...

Apparently you two wouldn't know a Socialist/Marxist if it bit you in the butt.
 
Councilman said:
I challenge the Liberals and Others who call names and claim What Glenn says is propaganda to come up with specific items where he got it wrong, and not use the Alensky

I was impressed when Beck joined me in his realization that Obama was a Socialist/Marxist and he continues to get it right on target pointing out two things Liberals can't deal with, FACTS & the TRUTH.

It is beyond the ability of Leftists to deal in reality.
Click to expand...

I <3 FACTS AND THE TRUTH.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/bias-media/76326-glenn-beck-distorted-barack-obamas-views-u-s-constitution-video.html#post1058839876

Glenn Beck, not so much.
 
LimeLight said:
If you wish to learn about political parties and ideals, I believe there is a post on these forums to do so. I don't need any type of reasonable and sound counter argument to tell you a libertarian is not a liberal.
Click to expand...

Ahh... Indeed. And What Progressive does?

Ya see how that works friends? And this has been a longstanding trend... Progressives don't NEED AN ARGUMENT. They don't NEED SOUND REASONING resting on a valid logical construct. No no... All the Progressive needs is the self assurance that validity and truth rest somewhere in the middle-way... They're in the middle, so... it's axiomatic.
And therein lies the amazing convenience of hysterical populism. No thinkin' necessary... just latch onto the compromise between right and wrong and PRESTO!

Ya automatically feel better about being wrong... I mean after it's the 3rd WAY~ Ya mixed in HALF RIGHT, so how bad can it be?

If you wish to truly distinguish the difference I suggest visiting that thread. Further argument with you is not 'reasonable' to me.
Click to expand...

Indeed... that would be the comfort of one's delusion, intrinsic in owning the inferior position. Such usually begins by projecting that the superior position is simply not reasonable. Which of course is IRRESISTABLE where the rules axiomatically reject any need for logically valid, intellectually sound reasoning.

By default, using your irrational claims, I choose to not argue with someone of your magnitude.
Click to expand...

ROFL... My claims are irrational? Which claims are those Sis? The claim which challenges your self-assigned title as "Libertarian"? Huh... I thought it fairly spot on, given you're a self-professed "Moderate" in your account shingle.... Moderates are the embodiment of the Progressive, Scout. That you feel you need to lean on the right side of that yellow line is a good sign; you at least seem to have some discernible sign of conscience. But at the end of the day, knowing you're wrong only adds to the severity of one's punishment, where one continues to walk down the leftist path and it manifest itself into Anti-American action.


Doing so will most likely result in throwing this thread completely off-topic.
Click to expand...

The topic is Glenn Beck and his re-educating of the American Public; a tactic which he's chosen as a means to replace the misinformation, disinformation and raw revisionism employed by the Ideological Left as a means to subvert America; as a means to dislodge from America the immutable Principles intrinsic in the cornerstone of her foundation... I'm simply pointing out that those who disagree with Beck, do so because they (you) are part and parcel of that foreign ideology... I've merely asked you to produce a valid stated basis for your disagreement with Beck; to which you've responded by denying you're a Progressive and demanding that you've no 'NEED TO HAVE A SOUND ARGUMENT'... which I pointed out was incontrovertible evidence of a progressive, demonstrating that such is precisely what ya are.

I'd say we're centered on the issue. So don't sweat it.
 
I think Publius is doing us a great service in this thread in that he is illustrating the type of rhetoric that Beck uses. Good job Publius :applaud
 
Those damned schools are INDOCTRINATING our CHILDREN!
Sign up for Beck-U!
 
PubliusInfinitu said:
Ahh... Indeed. And What Progressive does?

Ya see how that works friends? And this has been a longstanding trend... Progressives don't NEED AN ARGUMENT. They don't NEED SOUND REASONING resting on a valid logical construct. No no... All the Progressive needs is the self assurance that validity and truth rest somewhere in the middle-way... They're in the middle, so... it's axiomatic.
And therein lies the amazing convenience of hysterical populism. No thinkin' necessary... just latch onto the compromise between right and wrong and PRESTO!
Click to expand...

Have you educated yourself on Libertarians yet? If you have, I insist you give your reasoning to me as how they are 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists', whatever Beck might be calling them these days.

Also maybe you can give your reasoning on how moderates, centrists, etc. are also 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists'.

If you give me good reasoning perhaps i can debate further the difference.

Indeed... that would be the comfort of one's delusion, intrinsic in owning the inferior position. Such usually begins by projecting that the superior position is simply not reasonable. Which of course is IRRESISTABLE where the rules axiomatically reject any need for logically valid, intellectually sound reasoning.
Click to expand...

I'm delusional because i believe you aren't reasonable? I've yet to see any reasonable points from you linking 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists' 'moderates' 'centrists' 'libertarians', other then the typing of said words progressive and populist etc. in caps lock.

ROFL... My claims are irrational? Which claims are those Sis? The claim which challenges your self-assigned title as "Libertarian"? Huh... I thought it fairly spot on, given you're a self-professed "Moderate" in your account shingle.... Moderates are the embodiment of the Progressive, Scout. That you feel you need to lean on the right side of that yellow line is a good sign; you at least seem to have some discernible sign of conscience. But at the end of the day, knowing you're wrong only adds to the severity of one's punishment, where one continues to walk down the leftist path and it manifest itself into Anti-American action.
Click to expand...

What you think is spot on may be rational to you, but refusing to give reasoning behind it doesn't make it rational to others. Again give me reason behind your claim. Infact, you would be better off actually making some sort of logical, coherent point.

The topic is Glenn Beck and his re-educating of the American Public; a tactic which he's chosen as a means to replace the misinformation, disinformation and raw revisionism employed by the Ideological Left as a means to subvert America; as a means to dislodge from America the immutable Principles intrinsic in the cornerstone of her foundation... I'm simply pointing out that those who disagree with Beck, do so because they (you) are part and parcel of that foreign ideology... I've merely asked you to produce a valid stated basis for your disagreement with Beck; to which you've responded by denying you're a Progressive and demanding that you've no 'NEED TO HAVE A SOUND ARGUMENT'... which I pointed out was incontrovertible evidence of a progressive, demonstrating that such is precisely what ya are.

I'd say we're centered on the issue. So don't sweat it.
Click to expand...

The topic is about his university. The topic isn't about whether Beck is right or wrong. Being liberal is not an Anti-American foreign ideology. We have a 2 party system for a reason.

I'm not automatically progressive because i choose not to have an argument with an incoherent, irrational dope, who has yet to give his reasoning behind why be believes all 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists' 'moderates' 'centrists' 'libertarians' are all alike and Anti-American.

Once you have made a point i consider reasonable we will discuss this further.

Have you educated yourself as why a libertarian is not a liberal yet?
 
LimeLight said:
Have you educated yourself as why a libertarian is not a liberal yet?
Click to expand...

I wonder if he knows that Beck says he leans libertarian......
 
PubliusInfinitu said:
Ahh... Indeed. And What Progressive does?

Ya see how that works friends? And this has been a longstanding trend... Progressives don't NEED AN ARGUMENT. They don't NEED SOUND REASONING resting on a valid logical construct. No no... All the Progressive needs is the self assurance that validity and truth rest somewhere in the middle-way... They're in the middle, so... it's axiomatic.
And therein lies the amazing convenience of hysterical populism. No thinkin' necessary... just latch onto the compromise between right and wrong and PRESTO!

Ya automatically feel better about being wrong... I mean after it's the 3rd WAY~ Ya mixed in HALF RIGHT, so how bad can it be?



Indeed... that would be the comfort of one's delusion, intrinsic in owning the inferior position. Such usually begins by projecting that the superior position is simply not reasonable. Which of course is IRRESISTABLE where the rules axiomatically reject any need for logically valid, intellectually sound reasoning.



ROFL... My claims are irrational? Which claims are those Sis? The claim which challenges your self-assigned title as "Libertarian"? Huh... I thought it fairly spot on, given you're a self-professed "Moderate" in your account shingle.... Moderates are the embodiment of the Progressive, Scout. That you feel you need to lean on the right side of that yellow line is a good sign; you at least seem to have some discernible sign of conscience. But at the end of the day, knowing you're wrong only adds to the severity of one's punishment, where one continues to walk down the leftist path and it manifest itself into Anti-American action.




The topic is Glenn Beck and his re-educating of the American Public; a tactic which he's chosen as a means to replace the misinformation, disinformation and raw revisionism employed by the Ideological Left as a means to subvert America; as a means to dislodge from America the immutable Principles intrinsic in the cornerstone of her foundation... I'm simply pointing out that those who disagree with Beck, do so because they (you) are part and parcel of that foreign ideology... I've merely asked you to produce a valid stated basis for your disagreement with Beck; to which you've responded by denying you're a Progressive and demanding that you've no 'NEED TO HAVE A SOUND ARGUMENT'... which I pointed out was incontrovertible evidence of a progressive, demonstrating that such is precisely what ya are.

I'd say we're centered on the issue. So don't sweat it.
Click to expand...

Is your cap lock broke, dude?:confused:
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
If you think beck is a pundit without satire and comedy, then your watching him less than I am.... ;)



I think he's little different than stewart and colbert. :shrug:
Click to expand...

They are actually funny and tell people to not take them seriously.
 
obvious Child said:
Well, if you can't start a religion to get rich, this isn't a bad way to separate your foolish followers from their money.

Props to Beck. Making his already ignorant followers more ignorant and less wealthy.
Click to expand...

It's free, but don't let the facts get in your way. As far as making people more ignorant, that's a matter of opinion.
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
incorrect. Maher was a liberal who called himself a libertarian. This has been proven time and again here on DP.
Click to expand...

As opposed to Republicans who started calling themselves Libertarians when Bush started looking bad?
 
Redress said:
As opposed to Republicans who started calling themselves Libertarians when Bush started looking bad?
Click to expand...

They also started switching to Independent as did many Dems when they realized Obama wasn't the change they wanted.
This has little to do with Mahr trying to pass himself off as a libertarian.
 
Barbbtx said:
It's free, but don't let the facts get in your way. As far as making people more ignorant, that's a matter of opinion.
Click to expand...

It's not exactly free. You have to be an Insider Extreme member, but the price hasn't been raised. It's just another add-on.
 
Im waiting for him to start an art school now that he claims to be an oil painter, LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom