PubliusInfinitu
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 10
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It's funny how someone who follows the master of accusation, generalization, and conspiracy demand any sort of "intellectually sound, logically valid argument" from anybody.
Especially when you make the wild accusation (which is totally demanding an "intellectually sound, logically valid argument") that anybody who might happen to dislike or not agree with Beck are "Leftists trying to pawn themselves off as Moderate, Centrist, Main-stream independents."
You should seek to educate yourselves on other points of view other then yourself. You clearly lack that knowledge.
Fascinatin'... And once AGAIN, the Progressives come to lament their anti-American position, DEMANDING that disagreeing with American principle can in NO WAY disqualify them for the title...
But the odds require that SOONER OR LATER... they'll eventually produce an argument wherein they demonstrate that rejecting American principle can potentially provide the bearer with the means to ADHERE TO THE CORRELATING TITLE.
And yes... this is a backhanded challenge to simply state where you've the means to disagree with Beck, by showing where he was inaccurate and has wrongly represented the facts, providing for a valid means to disagree... and NOT be recognized as a Progressive anti-American.
It's not a particularly complex equation ...