Last edited by tacomancer; 07-05-10 at 10:28 AM.
Also i never stated that he was wrong or supported inaccurate facts. I believe that was someone else. So i have never engaged in a debate with you. I was simply pointing out you were wrong in your claim of "Leftists trying to pawn themselves off as Moderate, Centrist, Main-stream independents." Also if you believe those that disagree with Beck are Progressive Anti-American, I once again urge you to educate yourself.But the odds require that SOONER OR LATER... they'll eventually produce an argument wherein they demonstrate that rejecting American principle can potentially provide the bearer with the means to ADHERE TO THE CORRELATING TITLE.
And yes... this is a backhanded challenge to simply state where you've the means to disagree with Beck, by showing where he was inaccurate and has wrongly represented the facts, providing for a valid means to disagree... and NOT be recognized as a Progressive anti-American.
It's not a particularly complex equation ..
Note, when Barton reads from the Congressional record he doesn't explain the "for our schools" is from Aitkin and not the Congress.
David Barton (author) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBarton has been widely accused by both conservatives and liberals of practicing historical revisionism, and described as being a pseudohistorian.