• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Egyptian minister: Obama told me he is a Muslim

Personally, I don't want a fundamentalist Christian as a President either.
Jimmy Carter quoted the Bible and taught Sunday School classes in a Baptist Church while he was President.
 
Sorry, for being so serious after all that well deserved fun, but I wonder, where does this weird myth stem from Obama is Muslim, which apparently seems resistant to all evidence to the contrary? (And this fear of Islam in general -- apparently, it would bother people who believe Obama is a Muslim much more if he were, than it would bother people who don't believe it, even if it was true.)

Is it because many people are just not at all familiar with people who have such a cosmopolitan vita like Obama, because they've hardly ever met people who were not like them - down to earth, well-rooted Americans - and thus react with fear and suspicion, just because they don't know such a thing?

Is it a kind of racism that relies on the stereotype of the "angry black power activist" who turns to Islam? Obama as the "second coming of Malcom X" in a way?

And this general distrust against Islam, is it just common xenophobia, or religiously (Christian-based) anti-Islamism? Or an effect of the stereotype that "Islam = terrorism"?

For the record: I'm not accusing anybody or jumping to conclusions. I'm just looking for answers, and hope this may fuel a fruitful debate.
 
i heard the New Zealand member for bovine brothels said Obama is a Zoroastrianist :shock:
 
Is it a kind of racism that relies on the stereotype of the "angry black power activist" who turns to Islam? Obama as the "second coming of Malcom X" in a way?

Is possible to bash Obama without being called a racist? Do any of your Obama-bots realize that you're doing nothing but crying wolf with this behavior and taking attention away from real racism that exists in our world?

And this general distrust against Islam, is it just common xenophobia, or religiously (Christian-based) anti-Islamism? Or an effect of the stereotype that "Islam = terrorism"?

Islam does = terrorism. Whatelse is new?

For the record: I'm not accusing anybody or jumping to conclusions. I'm just looking for answers, and hope this may fuel a fruitful debate.

One word for you, my German friend: Holocaust
 
And this general distrust against Islam, is it just common xenophobia, or religiously (Christian-based) anti-Islamism? Or an effect of the stereotype that "Islam = terrorism"?
Some would argue that it is not just a stereotype. I think the worst terrorist attack in recent history, perpetrated by Muslims for religious reasons, against the US tends to put many Americans "on edge" regarding Islam. I, for one, was quite bothered by the fact that the rest of the "moderate" Muslim World's response to 9/11 was more of defending their own "moderate" stance rather than remorsefulness or anger toward their more "fundamentalist" bretheren. :hm:
 
Is possible to bash Obama without being called a racist?

My statement did not refer to people "bashing" Obama. It did refer to people who think he is a Muslim, regardless if they approve of him or dislike him (although the latter group may be more prominent among those who believe he is a Muslim, because or despite it).

And then, I did not call anybody anything. I asked a question, and explicitly made clear I did just that. If you think the answer is "no", then you can say so without being disrespectful or rude, and without jumping to unwarranted conclusions.

Do any of your Obama-bots realize that you're doing nothing but crying wolf with this behavior and taking attention away from real racism that exists in our world?

First: Who do you talk to when you address "Obama-bots"? Anybody here in this debate?

You are right, real racism does exist. I think it's self-evident that some of it also still exists in today's America, and it's very likely that those racists who do exist in America will most likely not approve of Obama. How large this group is, is an empirical question. I am not familiar with according statistics or studies that may quantify that number. Maybe anybody else here is?

Islam does = terrorism. Whatelse is new?

I think this statement speaks for itself.

One word for you, my German friend: Holocaust

Coca Cola. Impeachment. Stolen election.

Look, I can also produce random words without any context. Recently, I witnessed a pretty clever three year old -- he was very good at it. I'm just not sure what it's supposed to achieve.

If you have a sound argument to advance, you might be willing to make it.
 
Last edited:
Some would argue that it is not just a stereotype. I think the worst terrorist attack in recent history, perpetrated by Muslims for religious reasons, against the US tends to put many Americans "on edge" regarding Islam. I, for one, was quite bothered by the fact that the rest of the "moderate" Muslim World's response to 9/11 was more of defending their own "moderate" stance rather than remorsefulness or anger toward their more "fundamentalist" bretheren. :hm:

Yes, I understand where you are coming from, and I'd agree that the problem of violent extremism is a bigger problem in Islam than in other religions. Yet both my personal experience (I know quite a few people who are at least formally Muslims) and the reactions I observed of Muslim communities and authorities here in Germany make me think that although slightly nutty behavior maybe widespread among Muslims (like a questionable attitude towards sexual morals, male authority and artist criticism of religion), yet a large majority is strictly opposed to terrorism or murder in the name of their religion.

It's obvious there are problematic differences between many Muslims and Western liberals (small "l") that need to be addressed and solved, but I don't think they are categorically different from the same kind of problems that exist between extreme Christians or Jews with the more progressive proponents of Western free order (although their degree may be higher, admittedly).

At any rate, a villification of Islam won't bring us anywhere. What is it supposed to achieve? Eternal conflict and war, which will go on forever until all Muslims are either subdued or annihilated? I neither think this is feasible, nor legitimate. That's why I think we have no choice but finding an agreement and a way for peaceful coexistence at least, if not even permanent dialogue. There just is no realistic alternative.

What do you think?
 
Sorry, for being so serious after all that well deserved fun, but I wonder, where does this weird myth stem from Obama is Muslim, which apparently seems resistant to all evidence to the contrary? (And this fear of Islam in general -- apparently, it would bother people who believe Obama is a Muslim much more if he were, than it would bother people who don't believe it, even if it was true.)

Is it because many people are just not at all familiar with people who have such a cosmopolitan vita like Obama, because they've hardly ever met people who were not like them - down to earth, well-rooted Americans - and thus react with fear and suspicion, just because they don't know such a thing?

Is it a kind of racism that relies on the stereotype of the "angry black power activist" who turns to Islam? Obama as the "second coming of Malcom X" in a way?

And this general distrust against Islam, is it just common xenophobia, or religiously (Christian-based) anti-Islamism? Or an effect of the stereotype that "Islam = terrorism"?

For the record: I'm not accusing anybody or jumping to conclusions. I'm just looking for answers, and hope this may fuel a fruitful debate.

Im not saying anything until you hook me up with a few German chicks. :roll: German woman are hot! :2razz:
 
At any rate, a villification of Islam won't bring us anywhere. What is it supposed to achieve? Eternal conflict and war, which will go on forever until all Muslims are either subdued or annihilated? I neither think this is feasible, nor legitimate. That's why I think we have no choice but finding an agreement and a way for peaceful coexistence at least, if not even permanent dialogue. There just is no realistic alternative.

What do you think?
I agree; but I would have to say that in the recent past the US has tried much harder than the Muslim World to bring about peaceful and diplomatic solutions. The Arabs/Muslims (at least various groups/states in the Muslim World) have been waging war for over two-thousand years against Judaism and Christianity. I believe most Christians have given up the Crusades, the Muslim World; however, seems to feel otherwise.
 
Islam = terrorism? How can anyone be that stupid? Thats like say Christianity = Hutaree, the Michigan Christian militia which wanted to over throw the gov't, because I'm just going to focus on a small minority of Christianity and pretend like it applies to the whole.

As for Barack being a Muslim, there's NO evidence to support it. And what "evidence" you do have is circumstantial, he once wore ethnic clothes in Kenya, some guy writing a blog says an Egyptian politician told him in secret he is a Muslim, without any source by the way. Since when does anyone take what some guy just says without any evidence as total truth? They do when they have already reached a conclusion and are just waiting for anything they could use as "proof."

PLUS the guy in the blog states that Barack Obama told the Egyptian Foreign minister that he was "sympatetic(the blogger misspelled this word by the way) towards the Muslim agenda." But WHAT Muslim agenda, what does that even mean? There is NO "Muslim Agenda" Islam and Islamic countries are just as divided as Christianity and Christian nations. Everyone here saying this is "proof" or evidence of Obama's secret identity has also pointed out several times that in Iraq and Afghanistan the majority of civilian deaths are caused by in-fighting or terrorist groups. So is that the Muslim agenda? Fight a civil war with themselves, real great strategy there, and I guess the Sunni/Shia division is all fake too.
 
Im not saying anything until you hook me up with a few German chicks. :roll: German woman are hot! :2razz:

Hahaha ... I'm not sure I'm the right person to do that.

But as a consolation prize, I want at least to give you this insight into contemporary German pop-culture (and yes, it does involve a German chick! =) ):

 
Im not saying anything until you hook me up with a few German chicks. :roll: German woman are hot! :2razz:
Did German women finally start shaving their pits? JK, Katarina Witt, now there's a hottie :smoking:
 
I agree; but I would have to say that in the recent past the US has tried much harder than the Muslim World to bring about peaceful and diplomatic solutions. The Arabs/Muslims (at least various groups/states in the Muslim World) have been waging war for over two-thousand years against Judaism and Christianity. I believe most Christians have given up the Crusades, the Muslim World; however, seems to feel otherwise.

I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. Of course you are right when you point to Muslim countries that are ugly dictatorships with anti-Western agendas: There are problems with Iran, Syria, to a lesser degree northern African Arab countries. But I don't think the troubles with these countries are primarily based on their Muslim religion. After all, there are many examples to the contrary: Saudi-Arabia is an orthodox Muslim country with a stone-age society, where the lable "islamofascism" actually fits -- yet, it's a close ally of the US and the West, and their leadership hardly makes trouble. Turkey is an example for a very open and even secular Muslim country. Egypt may occasionally be a little annoying, but in general is a US ally as well. And Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country, doesn't pose any threat whatsoever for the West.

All these countries may not meet our standards of a free and democratic society, but they are not attacking us either, or posing too many diplomatic problems. In fact, at very least peaceful coexistence, usually even significant amount of trade is very well possible and common with these countries. That they are Muslim apparently doesn't make them any more aggressive towards us.

The problems that arise, especially with Iran and Syria, probably have more to do with their status as emerging regional powers, including proliferation, similar to the problem with North Korea (which obviously isn't Muslim). The problem in Pakistan (and other generally peaceful Muslim countries) is hardly a problem of their entire population being extremist and anti-Western, but with smaller extremist Muslim subgroups within these countries, that are hardly a majority and usually opposed by the Muslim establishment within these countries and their elites.

So I don't think Islam in general is violent or especially expansionist, in general. There are problems, yes, but I don't think they can be generalized.
 
Last edited:
i heard the New Zealand member for bovine brothels said Obama is a Zoroastrianist :shock:

My cousin's girlfriend's mother's boyfiend's best friend's uncle's co-worker's nanny's husband's mistress's newborn's nurse's dog's dog sitter's great-aunt's god daughter's teacher's principal's secretary's boyfriend's friend who knows this guy said that Obama picks his nose and eats it.
 
My cousin's girlfriend's mother's boyfiend's best friend's uncle's co-worker's nanny's husband's mistress's newborn's nurse's dog's dog sitter's great-aunt's god daughter's teacher's principal's secretary's boyfriend's friend who knows this guy said that Obama picks his nose and eats it.

Most insightful post yet! I mean it. Perfect! ;)
 
Hahaha ... I'm not sure I'm the right person to do that.

But as a consolation prize, I want at least to give you this insight into contemporary German pop-culture (and yes, it does involve a German chick! =) ):



WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:shock: :shock:

She is SMOKIN' hot!!!!!!!!! :2razz:
She cant sing for **** though. :lol:
 
I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. Of course you are right when you point to Muslim countries that are ugly dictatorships with anti-Western agendas: There are problems with Iran, Syria, to a lesser degree northern African Arab countries. But I don't think the troubles with these countries are primarily based on their Muslim religion. After all, there are many examples to the contrary: Saudi-Arabia is an orthodox Muslim country with a stone-age society, where the lable "islamofascism" actually fits -- yet, it's a close ally of the US and the West, and their leadership hardly makes trouble. Turkey is an example for a very open and even secular Muslim country. Egypt may occasionally be a little annoying, but in general is a US ally as well. And Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country, doesn't pose any threat whatsoever for the West.

All these countries may not meet our standards of a free and democratic society, but they are not attacking us either, or posing too many diplomatic problems. In fact, at very least peaceful coexistence, usually even significant amount of trade is very well possible and common with these countries. That they are Muslim apparently doesn't make them any more aggressive towards us.

The problems that arise, especially with Iran and Syria, probably have more to do with their status as emerging regional powers, including proliferation, similar to the problem with North Korea (which obviously isn't Muslim). The problem in Pakistan (and other generally peaceful Muslim countries) is hardly a problem of their entire population being extremist and anti-Western, but with smaller extremist Muslim subgroups within these countries, that are hardly a majority and usually opposed by the Muslim establishment within these countries and their elites.

So I don't think Islam in general is violent or especially expansionist, in general. There are problems, yes, but I don't think they can be generalized.
So, I assume you guys in Germany have lived in a bubble since reunification, no real news ever gets in huh? Here are just a few sites if you are interested that tell of recent acts of ant-Christian/anti-Western thought violence in Egypt, Indonesia, Burma, and even Turkey.
Indonesia: Muslim mob burns two churches over lack of "permits" - Jihad Watch
The wave of anti-Christian violence | Simon Tisdall | Comment is free | The Guardian
US Congress team in Egypt to probe anti-Christian violence - Worldnews.com
Alarm in Turkey over violence against Christians (SETimes.com)

and here's another recent story from good ol' Egypt, who, btw, murdered their own president not so long ago, after one of our presidents helped negotiate a peace treaty between the Egyptians and Israel:


1263491313528
Coptic Christians protest in Egypt after an attack in which gunmen opened fire on a crowd of churchgoers. Photograph: Khaled El-Fiqi/EPA

Wake up and read the news. :roll:
 
Last edited:
So, I assume you guys in Germany have lived in a bubble since reunification, no real news ever gets in huh? Here are just a few sites if you are interested that tell of recent acts of ant-Christian/anti-Western thought violence in Egypt, Indonesia, Burma, and even Turkey.
Indonesia: Muslim mob burns two churches over lack of "permits" - Jihad Watch
The wave of anti-Christian violence | Simon Tisdall | Comment is free | The Guardian
US Congress team in Egypt to probe anti-Christian violence - Worldnews.com
Alarm in Turkey over violence against Christians (SETimes.com)

and here's another recent story from good ol' Egypt, who, btw, murdered their own president not so long ago, after one of our presidents helped negotiate a peace treaty between the Egyptians and Israel:


1263491313528


Wake up and read the news. :roll:

No need to get snippy.

What you post here in no way contradicts what I wrote.

All you mention are examples for extremist non-government organizations or individual extremists among Muslims. I never denied there is a problem with extremism in Islam.

But I don't think they allow generalizations about Islam. You can just as well present examples of anti-Muslim crimes across Europe, angry mobs attacking mosques and civil initiatives attempting to force Muslims out of their cities and countries, neo-Nazi attacks or even official discrimination. Geert Wilders in the Netherlands alone is responsible for much more anti-Muslim actions and hatred than the Muslims in the articles you posted combined. Does that allow the conclusion that the West is a bunch of anti-Muslim fanatics who give a **** about freedom of religion? Interested hawks in the Muslim world certainly do that, with not any less justification as people here make generalizations about Islam based on sources like those you posted.

I think we all should keep a cool head. It's easy to villify the other side, and to broad-brush whatever we are not famililar with. But I don't think it helps making this planet a better place.
 
Last edited:
No need to get snippy.

What you post here in no way contradicts what I wrote.

All you mention are examples for extremist non-government organizations or individual extremists among Muslims. I never denied there is a problem with extremism in Islam.

But I don't think they allow generalizations about Islam. You can just as well present examples of anti-Muslim crimes across Europe, angry mobs attacking mosques and civil initiatives attempting to force Muslims out of their cities and countries, neo-Nazi attacks or even official discrimination. Geert Wilders in the Netherlands alone is responsible for much more anti-Muslim actions and hatred than the Muslims in the articles you posted combined. Does that allow the conclusion that the West is a bunch of anti-Muslim fanatics who give a **** about freedom of religion? Interested hawks in the Muslim world certainly do that, with not any less justification as people here make generalizations about Islam based on sources like those you posted.

I think we all should keep a cool head. It's easy to villify the other side, and to broad-brush whatever we are not famililar with. But I don't think it helps making this planet a better place.
The problem is, most of these Muslim fanatical groups, which are allowed to exist within Muslim States, see America as a Christian Nation (and many as the Great Satan) and they tend to equate ANY form of Christianity (even their own Coptics) with America. By virtue of their irrational line of thinking, we (the USA) inadvertantly become a target of their aggression as well. Therefore, acts of anti-Christian violence perpetrated by these groups and accepted or in some cases even supported by Islamic governments essentially become problems for the U.S. In my view it is difficult to mutually exclude the two. Would you agree that in most of these Islamic states, there is little or no separation of government and religion? If so, does it become the responsibilty of their governments to "reign in" these extremist groups? If so, how can we separate the two?
 
I dont get whats the big deal, so he is Muslim... Big whoop
I dont get whats the big deal?
 
I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. Of course you are right when you point to Muslim countries that are ugly dictatorships with anti-Western agendas: There are problems with Iran, Syria, to a lesser degree northern African Arab countries. But I don't think the troubles with these countries are primarily based on their Muslim religion. After all, there are many examples to the contrary: Saudi-Arabia is an orthodox Muslim country with a stone-age society, where the lable "islamofascism" actually fits -- yet, it's a close ally of the US and the West, and their leadership hardly makes trouble. Turkey is an example for a very open and even secular Muslim country. Egypt may occasionally be a little annoying, but in general is a US ally as well. And Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country, doesn't pose any threat whatsoever for the West.

All these countries may not meet our standards of a free and democratic society, but they are not attacking us either, or posing too many diplomatic problems. In fact, at very least peaceful coexistence, usually even significant amount of trade is very well possible and common with these countries. That they are Muslim apparently doesn't make them any more aggressive towards us.

The problems that arise, especially with Iran and Syria, probably have more to do with their status as emerging regional powers, including proliferation, similar to the problem with North Korea (which obviously isn't Muslim). The problem in Pakistan (and other generally peaceful Muslim countries) is hardly a problem of their entire population being extremist and anti-Western, but with smaller extremist Muslim subgroups within these countries, that are hardly a majority and usually opposed by the Muslim establishment within these countries and their elites.

So I don't think Islam in general is violent or especially expansionist, in general. There are problems, yes, but I don't think they can be generalized.

The red in our quote could be changed from "is" to "was". They're changing, from the top down.

Also, if Turks are so tolerant, why do the Polizei dare not to go into the Turkish Ghetto's in Berlin?
Why is there Sharia law being carried out in these ghettos, girls murdered by their families because they became westernized?
Why do they not assimilate if they are so open? After so many years... and it isn't getting better.
Is it?

I'll say it's not all Turks... I have met some nice folks, and they make one hell of a good Doener.
Scharf bitte.

The media, for instance, has jumped on a recent case in Wiesbaden, a sleepy town of 200,000 where, in order to defend the honor of the family, a brother shot his sister after the sister decided to marry an ethnic German. Such kind of behavior is unfortunately all too normal. At a party recently, I spoke with a doctor who fulminated against what he sees in the urban hospital where he works in Mannheim. The doctor repeatedly stated that he had lots of Turkish friends and was not a nationalist but could not abide the Turkish women he saw daily who had been beaten to a bloody pulp by overzealous husbands. Such a perspective explains the European intolerance of the headscarf. Like this doctor, many Europeans do not believe that Muslim women are exercising their right to religious freedom by donning the headscarf, rather they see it as a political symbol that signifies oppression of women by the Islamic male patriarchy, which denies these women the right to learn German and interact in society and openly condones the physical abuse of women.
http://hnn.us/articles/12640.html
 
Last edited:
I did not say anything about the GOP this is about Obama. You try to give Obama a pass by brining up the GOP. You make my point
 
Back
Top Bottom