• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Maher: Obama Not Acting Like A "Real Black" President

Hey Rev, do you ever post topics that aren't lame "tu quoques"? It gets old. Maybe if they were actually funny tu quoques, I wouldn't mind it.




Really? Is this all I do?


please link and quote so you don't look so silly all the time. Thanks. :pimpdaddy:
 
Hmm... I didn't take that response to mean it was invalide because of Imus - I understood it to mean Imus was fired yet Maher is not due to an understanding or MIS-understanding of the comedy I guess. More appropriately it's showing a underlying comment of bias and not suggesting invalidity as in a tu quoque.
 
Really? Is this all I do?


please link and quote so you don't look so silly all the time. Thanks. :pimpdaddy:
The Hollywood dudes driving big limos to the GW summit

The Obama "nuclear option"

Bush and Hurricane Katrina vs. Obama and the oil spill

Imus (seriously, who remembers Imus) getting fired over "racist comment" vs. Bill Maher

etc

==
Nothing but "tu quoques", that's all I see.
 
Hmm... I didn't take that response to mean it was invalide because of Imus - I understood it to mean Imus was fired yet Maher is not due to an understanding or MIS-understanding of the comedy I guess. More appropriately it's showing a underlying comment of bias and not suggesting invalidity as in a tu quoque.
If they were both employed by the same company, and Imus got fired, but Bill didn't. Then that'd be a fairer accusation IMO. But it was his company that fired him (I don't even think he should've been fired myself). Bill works for a totally different employer. It's an example of a company being hyper-sensitive out of fear of losing ratings (just like Viacom with South Park), not real "hypocrisy".
 
Nothing but "tu quoques", that's all I see.

english-do-you-speak-it-demotivational-poster.jpg
 
The Hollywood dudes driving big limos to the GW summit

The Obama "nuclear option"

Bush and Hurricane Katrina vs. Obama and the oil spill

Imus (seriously, who remembers Imus) getting fired over "racist comment" vs. Bill Maher

etc

==
Nothing but "tu quoques", that's all I see.




:lol: you had to go back pretty far to find 4 instances out of what 40k posts the Greatness that is The Good Reverend has?



EPIC FAIL
 
Well shucks y'all sawry effin' I keent speak dat durn english stuff right all'o the time, y'aaalllllll. I durn learnt all my inglish from listening to country music like Honky Tonk Badonkadonk. yehaww :(
 
Well shucks y'all sawry effin' I keent speak dat durn english stuff right all'o the time, y'aaalllllll. I durn learnt all my inglish from listening to country music like Honky Tonk Badonkadonk. yehaww :(

Funny you would respond to a photo of a black gangster telling you to speak english by attempting to make fun of Country music........:roll:
 
I would love to hear the punchline.

you already know it
the punch line is people thinking it actually means something :)
 
you already know it
the punch line is people thinking it actually means something :)

So, by that logic, Maher could call Obama a nigger and it still wouldn't mean anything?
 
So, by that logic, Maher could call Obama a nigger and it still wouldn't mean anything?

The punch line would be that you know the meaning of that word.
 
The punch line would be that you know the meaning of that word.

Which word would that be? "Nigger"?

I'm black, I know the meaning very well.
 
So, by that logic, Maher could call Obama a nigger and it still wouldn't mean anything?

When people say "by that logic," what they really mean is "let me extrapolate what you said to a ridiculous conclusion and show it as evidence of an opinion you don't actually hold."

edit for an example:

apdst: Your info says "very conservative," so I'll assume that you, generally speaking, prefer "smaller government." Since you prefer smaller government, obviously you would LOVE to have NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL. Total anarchy. Like the wild west or central Africa. You would support dissolution of the United States of America as a governing entity. Why do you hate America?
 
Last edited:
When people say "by that logic," what they really mean is "let me extrapolate what you said to a ridiculous conclusion and show it as evidence of an opinion you don't actually hold."

edit for an example:

apdst: Your info says "very conservative," so I'll assume that you, generally speaking, prefer "smaller government." Since you prefer smaller government, obviously you would LOVE to have NO GOVERNMENT AT ALL. Total anarchy. Like the wild west or central Africa. You would support dissolution of the United States of America as a governing entity. Why do you hate America?

That would make me an anarchist vice a conservative. See how your post makes no sense at all? Great attempt at twisting my meaning, though. Thank you.
 
That would make me an anarchist vice a conservative. See how your post makes no sense at all? Great attempt at twisting my meaning, though. Thank you.

Err, you are aware that I was being deliberately ridiculous and don't actually believe you to hold this position, right? Did you not understand my post at all?

Here: I'll help.

When people say "by that logic," what they really mean is "let me extrapolate what you said to a ridiculous conclusion and show it as evidence of an opinion you don't actually hold."
 
So, by that logic, Maher could call Obama a nigger and it still wouldn't mean anything?

HUH?!
sorry what i said has NOTHING to do with what you said
there is NO logic what so ever behind what you said lol
 
During the election in 2007 I heard that term all the time from reporters and the like - it's use is quite common though I was taught that it was offensive and I've never used it.

Quite Common? I do not think so:(
 
What was offensive about the remark/joke was not that Maher has noticed that we have a black president and isn't sure how to refer to him but how he thinks a black president should act. He stated in the joke that he wanted a black president that would pull back his jacket to reveal the pistol in his belt to influence his negotiations. Doesn't that infer that all blacks are gangsters? It sure would be construed to say that if it came out of a conservatives mouth.

Of course Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton resemble that sterotype so I can understand where he's coming from.
 
This is literally the dumbest thread I've ever seen. Do you people not watch Leno or Letterman? It's a monologue. He's telling jokes. Jesus Christ.

I feel certain that this may come as an enormous shock to you but there are many folk who choose not to watch the likes of Leno, Letterman at all at any time.
And while I have heard of Leno and Letterman I have never heard of Mahler.
 
Mahler needs to crawl back under whatever rock originally spawned him. He's so irrelevant and ridiculous he makes Adam Sandler look dignified.
 
Back
Top Bottom