• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Buchanan: With Kagan, too many Jews on Supreme Court bench

How hard is this to understand?

Each post before you had been claiming that this statement was bigoted in one way or another. I had argued that it was not. You entered the thread and took the side of those who had been arguing that it was, going so far as to claim that I was refusing to see the truth of their claims.

You can say that that doesn't mean you think that what Buchanan said was bigoted, but it seems fairly logical to conclude that you were in accordance with their views.


Emphasis mine.

Not hard at all. I'm not having any problem understanding your lie about me.

Are you having a hard time understanding what you wrote?
 
He said I claimed Buchanan was bigoted. I can't make plain English any simpler for you.

Where??????? I put the statement up, please point it out?

I didn't take any side at all.

Does it feel good to lie so much? I would think it would be very uncomfortable.

:shock:
 
What I entered the thread saying was that Buchanan definitely said there were too many Jews on the SC.

You were arguing that's not what he said.

Now explain to me how seeing that is exactly what he said means I was claiming it was a bigoted thing to say.

You told a lie about what I said and you need to admit it and apologize.
 
He said I claimed Buchanan was bigoted. I can't make plain English any simpler for you.



I didn't take any side at all.

Does it feel good to lie so much? I would think it would be very uncomfortable.

Emphasis mine.

Not hard at all. I'm not having any problem understanding your lie about me.

Are you having a hard time understanding what you wrote?

You seem really riled up and it doesn't look like we're understanding each other, so I'm going to let you have the last word on this.
 
Where??????? I put the statement up, please point it out?



:shock:

It's been posted and reposted many times. It's on the thread right above yours. You can't have missed it. Unless you're missing it purposefully to be obtuse.
 
You seem really riled up and it doesn't look like we're understanding each other, so I'm going to let you have the last word on this.

But you're not going to apologize for accusing me of saying something I never said......
 
Very lame.

OK you refuse to admit you lied and you refuse to apologize....fine.

Don't tell lies about what I say again.

It does not make me happy to be lied about.
 
Very lame.

OK you refuse to admit you lied and you refuse to apologize....fine.

Don't tell lies about what I say again.

It does not make me happy to be lied about.

It is a good thing no one cares. :mrgreen:
 
It's too bad more right wingers don't care about the truth.

And what does being right or left wing have to do with anything claimed or said? That is nothing more than partisan hackery on your part.
 
I have no dog in this fight, I just want to have a discussion and I'm coming in here clean and want to understand peoples views.

SO since there seems to be confusion and disagreement, I'll start simple.

Queen, do you think what Buchanan said was bigoted? Do you think it was wrong or bad to say? Do you disagree with it but think its a legitimate view?
 
They are not running everything, but they control a major part of our country.

"Control"? You buy into this myth that because people have the same skin colour, the same ethnic heritage, the same genitilia, they all automatically
coagulate and act as a cohesive virus or bacteria controlling your bowel movements?

Yikes.

This need to lump people into simplistic blobs of protoplasm and then assume they all act identically to support the same agenda because they have been circumsized is absolutely absurd.

By the way has anyone checked? I believe the world is controlled by men with small penises? That is my theory. My other theory is that there are
other people with small penises who think the people with the small penises controlling the world are bigger then their penises.

In that theory I haven't quite figured out what to do with women yet. I have put in calls to Oprah, Tyra, and Lindsay Lohan to assist.
 
Back
Top Bottom