• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nationally, 60% Favor Letting Local Police Stop and Verify Immigration Status

That's incorrect. The Arizona law allows them to stop any brown person if they have "reasonable suspicion" that they are undocumented. That's the problem. What possibly could be the "reasonable suspicion" other than race?
Think about it.

The Governor of Arizona was just on Fox and in that state that is the law..........I don't know about California....Its so ****ed up...........
 
Sorry..but you are wrong. DUI checkpoints have been challenged numerous times and have been found to be unconstitutional in some instances and not in others. Essentially the law has been carved out by the court rulings such that if the checkpoint slows the flow of traffic and the cop merely inquires whether the individual has been drinking, amounting to an inquiry of a few seconds, no detention has occurred. The cases that were ruled unconstitutional were were the police had drivers perform random FST's or asked for driver's licenses which were then run through data banks to search for warrants. Those cases were held to be detentions.

Its pretty clear that you don't know what you are talking about and are the one who is not up to the task.
Got another poor analogy to argue?

You got a link describing that they cannot ask for your drivers license at a DUI checkpoint?

You still have not explained why racial profiling is racist. Instead you are defensive and abusive. Not a good debating strategy.
 
Its boggles the mind that you on the left would sell your sould for the Hispanic vote....Illegals are killing people in this country............


It has nothing to do with "Selling souls for votes". I agree that "REAL" immigration reform is necessary. But this silly law was ill conceived, not thought out...and does nothing other than appeal to the passions of those who want to get riled up over illegal immigration. THAT is the problem with legislators who are not intelligent enough to write a good bill....but love to political grandstand.
 
That's incorrect. The Arizona law allows them to stop any brown person if they have "reasonable suspicion" that they are undocumented. That's the problem. What possibly could be the "reasonable suspicion" other than race?
Think about it.

And BTW Navy...I'm sure you love the part of the bill that allows any joe plumber to file a lawsuit if they think the police aren't enforcing the law. Gonna make a lot of sue-happy plaintiffs and money grubbing lawyers happy in Arizona.......lets hear what you have to say about that.....too.[/QUOTE]

**** we already got that........I want the crime committed by Illegals stopped........
 
The Governor of Arizona was just on Fox and in that state that is the law..........I don't know about California....Its so ****ed up...........

Well....that's wrong. Either you heard it wrong or the Governor has their facts wrong. Then again...it was on FOX, so I wouldn't be shocked if they were also giving you bad facts.
Look at the law for yourself. Probable cause is not required.
 
It has nothing to do with "Selling souls for votes". I agree that "REAL" immigration reform is necessary. But this silly law was ill conceived, not thought out...and does nothing other than appeal to the passions of those who want to get riled up over illegal immigration. THAT is the problem with legislators who are not intelligent enough to write a good bill....but love to political grandstand.

Whatever it takes to get illegals out I am for........
 
You got a link describing that they cannot ask for your drivers license at a DUI checkpoint?

You still have not explained why racial profiling is racist. Instead you are defensive and abusive. Not a good debating strategy.

I'm not going to go link hunting to educate you. Educate yourself. Or call a DUI lawyer, they can explain it to you. The facts are the facts....they are out there if you wanna take a few minutes to educate yourself.
 
Well....that's wrong. Either you heard it wrong or the Governor has their facts wrong. Then again...it was on FOX, so I wouldn't be shocked if they were also giving you bad facts.
Look at the law for yourself. Probable cause is not required.

It is pretty simple.....She said you have to have probable cause........No way to misunderstand that DD.....
 
I'm not going to go link hunting to educate you. Educate yourself. Or call a DUI lawyer, they can explain it to you. The facts are the facts....they are out there if you wanna take a few minutes to educate yourself.

You made the claim. Back it up.
 
It is pretty simple.....She said you have to have probable cause........No way to misunderstand that DD.....

Like I said...she is either wrong or lying....or FOX is once again distorting the facts. Read up on the law yourself. The law does not require probable cause, only reasonable suspicion.
 
You made the claim. Back it up.

There is a thing called the internet, if you want to educate yourself. I've already been to law school and did DUI law for 5 years. I'm not going to waste my time trying to educate you. You can do that on your own time.
 
There is a thing called the internet, if you want to educate yourself. I've already been to law school and did DUI law for 5 years. I'm not going to waste my time trying to educate you. You can do that on your own time.

I am putting you on ignore. I got no time to waste with you anymore.
 
Don't the police need probable cause to stop folks? Is just being hispanic probable cause? Why does the GOP like to trample on the constitution?
They don't seem to care about ilegals either. They had six years to do something and totally ignored the problem.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer last week signed a new law into effect that authorizes local police to stop and verify the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant.

The article says that.

The actual law does not.

You would do well to learn the difference between an article and a law. The author of this piece used a poor choice of words, perhaps deliberately, and does not reflect the empirical truth of reality.
 
The actual law states, and i quote:
FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/04/16/AzSB1070.pdf
 
We will let the SCOTUS decide that...Not some partisan like you.......

And when the Supreme Court does....I suspect that all we will hear from partisans such as you is how the "activist" court thwarted the will of the people..... You guys are way too predictable.
 
I am putting you on ignore. I got no time to waste with you anymore.

You have to understand that DD is the biggest Liberal and Obama lover in DP and he knows how important the Hispanic vote is even if it tramples over the rights of legal aliens and other Americans who entered this country legally......The only important thing to him is Hussein Obama gets reelected......
 
And when the Supreme Court does....I suspect that all we will hear from partisans such as you is how the "activist" court thwarted the will of the people..... You guys are way too predictable.

I have never called the SCOTUS and actvist court.........I am sure you have by all the decisions you have been losing lately..........
 
You have to understand that DD is the biggest Liberal and Obama lover in DP and he knows how important the Hispanic vote is even if it tramples over the rights of legal aliens and other Americans who entered this country legally......The only important thing to him is Hussein Obama gets reelected......

That's a stretch. Who is trampling over the "rights of legal aliens and other Americans who entered this country legally". That should be an interesting explanation, I'll wait for.......

Thank you though for your description of me. I don't think that I am the biggest Liberal here, but its an honor and I'll accept your commendation...even if there are others out there more deserving.
 
I have never called the SCOTUS and actvist court.........I am sure you have by all the decisions you have been losing lately..........

I'm sure you will....as soon as they start to make rulings that you disagree with....just par for the course.
 
You are losing the privilege of not being harassed and detained because of the color of your skin. I count that as pretty important.

You are being neither harassed or detained. You are simply showing your proof of residency by showing your drivers license.

The question remains: is racial profiling racism? It is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom