• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

55% Favor Repeal of Health Care Bill

Standard conservatism: attack no matter what liberals do.

If Obama had NOT sent the additional troops, you'd be demanding to know why he isn't listening to the generals and why he doesn't want to win the war.

In the months before the increase in troops, conservatives had been attacking Obama on exactly that premise. Now that he did what you wanted, you're attacking him for that too.

You guys used to have a definite platform. Now your platform is "we're against what the Democrats are for!" How did that happen?

I agree with what you are saying. It's right on, but they never listen. I've tried calling them out on this and they either ignore the post or saying something like "you're just one of them damn liberal commies!"

When Bush was in office I was against his banker bailout and they called me a socialist. I was also against Obama's bailout but strangely they called me a patriot for that view. It's all double standards at it's best.
 
Standard conservatism: attack no matter what liberals do.

If Obama had NOT sent the additional troops, you'd be demanding to know why he isn't listening to the generals and why he doesn't want to win the war.

In the months before the increase in troops, conservatives had been attacking Obama on exactly that premise. Now that he did what you wanted, you're attacking him for that too.

You guys used to have a definite platform. Now your platform is "we're against what the Democrats are for!" How did that happen?

Hey you or your left wing buddy brought it up...I wish he would have sent the troops when the General asked for them instead of 3 months later...Probably could have saved some lives if he had done that..
 
Last edited:
Just remember they will always be liberals...;)

No.... they will always be democrats no matter how many times they trash one label and take up another.
 
Hey you or your left wing buddy brought it up...I wish he would have sent the troops when the General asked for them instead of 3 months later...Probably could have saved some lives if he had done that..

AHAHAHAH. And here we have the other thread where conservatives are attacking Obama for sending more troops because that leads to more casualties!

You guys need to get together and get your talking points straight, they're contradicting eachother!
 
AHAHAHAH. And here we have the other thread where conservatives are attacking Obama for sending more troops because that leads to more casualties!

You guys need to get together and get your talking points straight, they're contradicting eachother!

I am just responding to your post or one of your buddies.......You or he said Bush was sending troops to their death and it was costing to much in money......I said Hussein Obama sent 60,000 troops to Afghanistan......I want it only one way my left wing friend..........I want the president to listen to the generals in the field and do what they ask and not wait 3 months to do it........

I know of no conservatives on any thread who are complaining about Obama sending troops.......

Suppose you post a link to that or are you just making it up?

Your playing with the big boys now sonny...If you can't stand the heat don't come in the kitchen.........
 
Sorry my left wing friend I am no republican.........Nice try though.......:2wave:

I am not suprised:mrgreen: You have too many left wing friends to be a republican.

Hell, you were probably an admiral in Attila the Hun's Navy.:)
 
SEN. JON KYL: Our view is that we should repeal and replace the bill with the solutions that we think actually work. Obviously, the president will not sign a repeal bill that the Congress passes, so we're going to replace him with a better president in 2012

there :) fixed it.

It's also a bit unrealistic and I think mathematically impossible for Republicans to take enough seats in the fall elections to gain a 2/3's majority in the congress.

in this one election? yes. this +2012? no.
 
Not good news for Obama socialist health care......


55% Favor Repeal of Health Care Bill - Rasmussen Reports

March 25 2010


Just before the House of Representatives passed sweeping health care legislation last Sunday, 41% of voters nationwide favored the legislation while 54% were opposed. Now that President Obama has signed the legislation into law, most voters want to see it repealed.



The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey, conducted on the first two nights after the president signed the bill, shows that 55% favor repealing the legislation. Forty-two percent (42%) oppose repeal. Those figures include 46% who Strongly Favor repeal and 35% who Strongly Oppose it.

In terms of Election 2010, 52% say they’d vote for a candidate who favors repeal over one who does not. Forty-one percent (41%) would cast their vote for someone who opposes repeal.

Not surprisingly, Republicans overwhelmingly favor repeal while most Democrats are opposed. Among those not affiliated with either major party, 59% favor repeal, and 35% are against it.

Most senior citizens (59%) also favor repeal. Earlier, voters over 65 had been more opposed to the health care plan than younger adults. Seniors use the health care system more than anyone else

Yes, we all know the GOP and the big companies that bought them off are unhappy about the healthcare bill. It means they cannot rape the public any longer. I know this annoys various forms of big business scum.

It's high time business got a taste of its own medicine.
 
Yes, we all know the GOP and the big companies that bought them off are unhappy about the healthcare bill. It means they cannot rape the public any longer. I know this annoys various forms of big business scum.

It's high time business got a taste of its own medicine.

I wonder why the left hates big business so much.......Hell most of the CEOs are democrats and liberals like Bill Gates.....Why would you hate your own kind?

You would think they would want big business to be successful because they are the people that do the hiring....When Obama sticks big tax programs on them they are forced to lay off people........I wonder if any of these lefties were hired by someone who is poor.........
 
I wonder why the left hates big business so much.......Hell most of the CEOs are democrats and liberals like Bill Gates.....Why would you hate your own kind?

You would think they would want big business to be successful because they are the people that do the hiring....When Obama sticks big tax programs on them they are forced to lay off people........I wonder if any of these lefties were hired by someone who is poor.........

This is actually an interesting question. Some say it's because new taxes on small businesses will stall growth, in turn keeping the "big dawgs" in the corporate world at the top.

Edit to add: Remember, it's usually always about power and money.
 
This is actually an interesting question. Some say it's because new taxes on small businesses will stall growth, in turn keeping the "big dawgs" in the corporate world at the top.

Edit to add: Remember, it's usually always about power and money.

Yeah and it should make the lawyers richer exploiting the tax loop holes for the richest.

"Only the little people pay taxes" Leona Helmsley RIP

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leona_Helmsley[/ame]
 
Last edited:
"Only the little people pay taxes" Leona Helmsley RIP

You and Leona Helmsley are so far off from the truth it boggles my mind how you came to that conclusion.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0DLt9ih_VA"]YouTube- Obama's Socialist Tax Plan Explained[/ame]
 
They already have moved offshore in order to gain a tax shelter. "Screw the USA", they said, "I want it all."

The video did make me thirsty, though.:)

How ironic. I could swear I heard Obama say, "Screw the USA, I want it all."
 
You and Leona Helmsley are so far off from the truth it boggles my mind how you came to that conclusion.

Oh hey it's that overly simplistic and inane e-mail forward, except in youtube form. This is happening a lot lately.
 
Hey you or your left wing buddy brought it up...I wish he would have sent the troops when the General asked for them instead of 3 months later...Probably could have saved some lives if he had done that..
Conjecture much? You have no information that could possibly sustain your statement that lives could have been saved by surging earlier. Same location, same enemy, same results either way.
 
He probably saved more troops by providing the Taleban a less target-rich environment.
 
Hey you or your left wing buddy brought it up...I wish he would have sent the troops when the General asked for them instead of 3 months later...Probably could have saved some lives if he had done that..
None of McCrystals original plans called for sending in more troops before April. Where was your wishing when General Kiernan was calling for more troops for years and Bush ignored him
 
Conjecture much? You have no information that could possibly sustain your statement that lives could have been saved by surging earlier. Same location, same enemy, same results either way.

EWhen you don't have enough troops men get killed.......
 
Yes, we all know the GOP and the big companies that bought them off are unhappy about the healthcare bill. It means they cannot rape the public any longer. I know this annoys various forms of big business scum.

It's high time business got a taste of its own medicine.

Do you have any problem with the government forcing people to bu health insurance they don't want?
 
Back
Top Bottom