Page 70 of 72 FirstFirst ... 20606869707172 LastLast
Results 691 to 700 of 716

Thread: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

  1. #691
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:55 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,331
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by jallman View Post
    Nukes have it really hard for two solid years. It is a grueling program with a very high rate of drop out and suicide.

    However, it is probably one of the most lucrative career paths if you are setting yourself up to get an education in the military and get out. That's why they make it so attractive to accept the bonus and stay in.

    At the time I enlisted for it, it was a six year program with a huge resigning bonus for another measley two years.
    That is how I had it explained. A bonus early on for enlisting, 6 years, bit big bonus for another 2. I would have went that way except it was a 7 month wait, whereas I could get in as an AT almost immediately.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  2. #692
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Last Seen
    02-16-11 @ 08:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    36,915
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    That is how I had it explained. A bonus early on for enlisting, 6 years, bit big bonus for another 2. I would have went that way except it was a 7 month wait, whereas I could get in as an AT almost immediately.
    It makes sense though. If you think about what it costs to train a nuke, the huge bonus for the two years is more cost effective than training one for six. And actually, it's just four years worth of service out of him because those first two years are literally nothing but school. The fireman in nuke school is nothing but overhead for that two years.

  3. #693
    Professor

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    01-04-17 @ 10:49 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,432

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelzie View Post
    That's a completely different scenario. Gay men and women have been doing that sort of thing their entire lives in front of the same gender. Men and women haven't been doing that in front of each other and aren't used to it. Thankfully, just because gay people can do it doesn't mean we have to break down all barriers.
    Which is my point, we shouldn't have gays share the same housing as straights openly because gays haven't been open in the military in front of straights, and straights aren't used to it... It's the same thing. A barrier that shouldn't be crossed in my opinion, OR maybe we could have an all gay unit or gay military as a test before we rush f-up the cohesion of our military. We should also implement a test of women and men showering and sh**ting next to each other as well to see if this long standing tradition or barrier needs to be undone.

  4. #694
    Jedi Master
    Captain America's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    18,672

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by jallman View Post
    Nukes have it really hard for two solid years. It is a grueling program with a very high rate of drop out and suicide.

    However, it is probably one of the most lucrative career paths if you are setting yourself up to get an education in the military and get out. That's why they make it so attractive to accept the bonus and stay in.

    At the time I enlisted for it, it was a six year program with a huge resigning bonus for another measley two years.
    I was offered nukes during enlistment and the deal was, up front, a 6 y/o with two years of active reserve immediately following and two years inactive reserve on the back side. The SRB's we're at 32,000.00 at that time. (Early 80's) But, I chose Firecontrol instead. It was a 6 y/o too, with all the same trimmings. Only the SRB's were at 28,000.00 when I signed up.

    I still, to this day, wish I could whup that recruiter's ass for intentionally misleading me. But I digress. How many times have we all heard, "My recruiter lied!?"

    I think the Snipe's SRB's were at, like, 4-5k.
    Last edited by Captain America; 04-17-10 at 09:56 AM.

    It's GREAT to be me. --- "45% liberal/55% conservative"
    Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggy" until you can find a gun.

  5. #695
    Meh...
    MSgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    18,044

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by jallman View Post
    It is pretty easy once you realize that it's the only choice you have.
    Studies have shown that a change in diet, some four wheel drivin', and a Bud Light will have you scratching your balls like a straight guy in no time.

    MSgt
    Semper Fidelis
    USMC

  6. #696
    Meh...
    MSgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    18,044

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    I know that off the record the Commandant feels as we do......
    I know how the Commandant feels on and off the record. He is much more accomodating to the changing of times than you think. The Marine Corps, above all other branches, have always been a powerful force for momentum in terms of tactics, theories, intel, and social adaptation.

    The latest CMC Bullets has just come out. It is version 20100409. Periodically, the CMC (Commandant of the Marine Corps) visits the bases and delivers a sort of "State of the Union" to the Marines (I saw him about three weeks ago). These visits are largely to guage the general concerns of the Marines. Aside from Afghanistan, the universal health care effect, PPE, and others, a hot topic was "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." These questions and concerns are placed in the CMC Bullets and released to the Marine Corps. It is not classified by any means, but considered FOUO (For Official Use Only) and not intended for public publications. So I'll just drop the part about DADT that was spoken of in front of some nasty media:




    Q: Good morning, Sir. In the last couple of weeks, I've read a couple articles regrading your views on "Don't Ask, Don;t Tell." And being a public affairs officer, I'm not sure that I believe everything I read. So I'd like to know what your position is. Where you see the policy changes going in DOD? And do you think it's going to affect the Marine Corps? And if so, how?

    CMC: I was really afraid that question wasn't going to come up (laughter). Thanks, Kathy. (Laughter). Ladies and Gentlemen, our president has spoken. Our Commander in Chief has said that he wants to have this law repealed by the Congress. And I think it's important that we all understand, and I suspect this audience does, there is a law; there is the DOD policy - an agreed-upon compromise by President Clinton, the Congress, and DOD in 1993. And the policy falls under the overall tent of the law.

    When asked the question by the Congress to give a personal opinion - we are compelled to do that - and my comments to them were essentially, let's please stay focused on the important aspects of change and let's ask ourselves, as we view from the efforts of the working group going about, are we creating a better military able to fight the nation's wars? That's why we have a U.S. military. And in my belief, any change made ought to prosper that, not in some way detriment that. So I'll simply ask that that be our primary focus as we go downrange.

    I was asked my personal opinion. I said, my personal opinion is that the current law works. I'm absolutely certain that we have young, homosexual men and women in the United States Marine Corps today who are doing a fantastic job. No one knows their proclivity because they have chosen to keep it private, as we keep private a lot of other things in our daily lives. And they're serving well and faithfully and will be very proud of having been a Marine as they leave the force.

    But at this point, I will say that we await the results of the working group. I think it's going to be out some time towards the end of the year. And I think this will be a much more exhaustive and comprehensive study of the issue than has ever been conducted before. And we allw ill learn, I think, the results, really, across all the services of what they have to offer.

    Secretary Gates has said he believes that if the evidence is compelling, and there are significant issues with it, that we will have opportunity to sit down with the President and give him our best military advice. And he, then, will decide either to continue to push or to say, okay, I see an issue here perhaps I didn't completely understand before based upon the effects of the working group. So that's where we are.

    The Commandant has reported that the overwhelming majority of Marines have very deep concerns when it comes to living with homosexuals in the barracks. We are the only branch that houses two to a room and this is for a purpose. When all others overly concerned themselves with the "quality of life" topic in the 90's, the Marine Corps weighed it against what we do best. And that is building loyalties, cohesion at small level units, and brotherhood. "Gays in the open" is a concern.
    Last edited by MSgt; 04-17-10 at 03:46 PM.

    MSgt
    Semper Fidelis
    USMC

  7. #697
    Sage
    gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    uk
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    6,365

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by MSgt View Post
    I know how the Commandant feels on and off the record. He is much more accomodating to the changing of times than you think. The Marine Corps, above all other branches, have always been a powerful force for momentum in terms of tactics, theories, intel, and social adaptation.

    The Commandant has reported that the overwhelming majority of Marines have very deep concerns when it comes to living with homosexuals in the barracks. We are the only branch that houses two to a room and this is for a purpose. When all others overly concerned themselves with the "quality of life" topic in the 90's, the Marine Corps weighed it against what we do best. And that is building loyalties, cohesion at small level units, and brotherhood. "Gays in the open" is a concern.
    Can you explain how 'social adaptability' [within the Marines] driven by that momentum would have a problem with 'gays in the open'?


    Paul
    RIP THE EUROPEAN FORUM 2016

  8. #698
    Sage
    Navy Pride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Last Seen
    05-07-15 @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    39,883

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by MSgt View Post
    I know how the Commandant feels on and off the record. He is much more accomodating to the changing of times than you think. The Marine Corps, above all other branches, have always been a powerful force for momentum in terms of tactics, theories, intel, and social adaptation.

    The latest CMC Bullets has just come out. It is version 20100409. Periodically, the CMC (Commandant of the Marine Corps) visits the bases and delivers a sort of "State of the Union" to the Marines (I saw him about three weeks ago). These visits are largely to guage the general concerns of the Marines. Aside from Afghanistan, the universal health care effect, PPE, and others, a hot topic was "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." These questions and concerns are placed in the CMC Bullets and released to the Marine Corps. It is not classified by any means, but considered FOUO (For Official Use Only) and not intended for public publications. So I'll just drop the part about DADT that was spoken of in front of some nasty media:


    The Commandant has reported that the overwhelming majority of Marines have very deep concerns when it comes to living with homosexuals in the barracks. We are the only branch that houses two to a room and this is for a purpose. When all others overly concerned themselves with the "quality of life" topic in the 90's, the Marine Corps weighed it against what we do best. And that is building loyalties, cohesion at small level units, and brotherhood. "Gays in the open" is a concern.

    Thanks for the update from the CMC...He seems like a straight shooter to me...You talk about 2 men to a room and aboard ship we might have 100 men in a berthing compartment not much bigger then a room.....I just hope the enlisted men who it affects have a say in the decision...All these Liberals in DP say sure go for it.......Most of them the policy does no affect....No skin off their ass........I wonder how they would feel if they had to serve aboard ship with long periods at sea under those conditions...........

    One more thing if Bush was still president and it was his policy to keep DADT and a bunch of liberals wanted to change it what the SECDEF and the Joint Chiefs would say.........Guess we will never know...........
    "God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."

  9. #699
    Meh...
    MSgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    18,044

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by gunner View Post
    Can you explain how 'social adaptability' [within the Marines] driven by that momentum would have a problem with 'gays in the open'?


    Paul
    It comes down to professionalism.

    I believe that the majority of anti-gay cases will come from outside the Marine Corps, but that the most extreme issues may come from it. It may look much like the hazing issue in the 90s. Most cases were coming from the other branches in general, but the most extreme came from the Corps because of the culture. In terms of status, the Marine Corps has a certain "manhood" attached to it. There's a certain level of alpha male that isn't found in other places. Therefore, we are talking about a cultural shift in identity for us. Think about what Hollwood has portrayed as the stereotypical homosexual. Now put a set of Dress Blues on it. The term "homosexual Marine" just doesn't fit in a lot of minds. But there's a certain kind of homosexual that joins and would join even under "serving openly." They are not the effeminate stereotype.

    From blacks to women, the adaptation process in the Marine Corps hasn't been without imperfection. But because Marines are bred to obey orders and to enforce orders while keeping their personal opinions out of it, they will assimilate to the new policies easier. Personal opinion will be relegated to conduct off duty, which is where the racial cases of the past took place. However, the leadership, from General to Corporal, will deal with it because that is their job.

    If the President makes it so, the Comandant will print the orders. Everyone below will have a job to do.
    Last edited by MSgt; 04-17-10 at 11:13 PM.

    MSgt
    Semper Fidelis
    USMC

  10. #700
    Guru

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Warren and Barrington, R.I.
    Last Seen
    05-24-10 @ 02:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,877

    Re: Marine officer: Gays, straights shouldn't share housing

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    Good to see some senior officers speaking up on this insanity


    http://www.debatepolitics.com/newthr...ewthread&f=130

    March 26 2010


    CNN) -- The Marine Corps' top officer says he would want to avoid housing gay and heterosexual Marines in the same rooms on base if the ban on gays openly serving in the military is lifted.

    "I would not ask our Marines to live with someone that's homosexual if we can possibly avoid it," Marine Commandant Gen. James Conway told a Web site in an interview posted Friday. "And to me that means we've got to build [barracks] that have single rooms."

    Some senior members of the military, however, have expressed concern over the impact of the ban's repeal on unit cohesion and morale, among other things
    -
    Hey Navy, is that you speaking or PopEye???
    Mommy I am only 10 years old and I was surprised to kick the ass of that Pussy. Son that Pussy didn't listen to S.S.1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •