We do have the best military in the world, and I have every confidence that something trivial like this will be handled even easier by our military than the militaries of the other countries that have managed to allow gays to serve openly.
Please do not think that I have no respect for service just because I'm trying to goad NP by presenting the absurdity of his view as it reflects on the nature of the military. If you wish to be angry at someone, then be angry at him. He honestly feels that our military, the greatest military in the world, is so unprofessional that straight and gay men could not serve openly together. He feels that our men in uniform are more concerned with getting hit on that with completing their missions.
NP has done far more to belittle the military with his views in this thread that my facetiousness ever could.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
a gay man and a straight man are still the same gender, btw. i don't think too many women would care about being naked around other women, gay or straight. we don't tend to worry about our womanhood.
Originally Posted by johnny_rebson:
These are the same liberals who forgot how Iraq attacked us on 9/11.