- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- Messages
- 8,211
- Reaction score
- 4,179
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Even setting aside the fact that $727b =/= $1T, can you think of a reason why the projections for expenditures from 2009-2018 are entirely non-responsive to the claim that the program, which was passed in 2003, cost $549b over the first 10 years of expenditures?
I asked you for evidence from this letter showing that the current bill will result in savings of $1.2T over the second decade.
You responded with a quote from an October 2009 letter analyzing a different bill and discussing spending in the program's first decade.
...
I think he thinks that spamming random blocks of text will just confuse people enough to make them think he knows what he's talking about.