What "effective" response would you expect to a post that offered nothing other than mere denials that a problem exists?
This is a lie.
My post asked you to show that the information you provided was significant, especially in the terms that you used, and belittled the signficance of two of the 'fact' you presented.
Your response? Ineffective - but not a surprise, given the noted depth of your understanding.
So, in the context of the claim you made, that 'only the eflite few will have health care':
-Compare and contrast the claimed 3200% increase over almost 40 years with rising costs in other areas. Make sure to control for population increase as well as the advancement of technology.
-Show how America’s healthcare spending alone would represent the world’s seventh largest economy is meaningful, given that we have the world;s third largest ppoluation
-Show how a 3% gain in GDP share over 7 years meaninglfully supports your claim.
Note that I do not expect that you will actually try to do this.
Obviously, it you cannot see that there is a serious problem than anything that anyone would offer in terms of a response would be met with nothing other than further denial from you.
Even more obviously, if you cannot address the three points, above, you do not have sufficient grasp of the situation to have an infomed opinion regarding same, and as such, any positions taken by you are baed on your adherence to the party line, sheer, abject, wanton ignorance, or both.
Imagine where liberalism would be, if not for the useful idiots.