There's no bloody holes, Gaza is a civilian area which means it's against international law to use weapons like this.Which is why there are holes within the international law that surround this conflict.
The Gazan government, the terrorist organization of Hamas, launches rockets at Israeli civilians from civilian complexes and buildings.
That officially makes it a military zone, but civilians still live there.
Yes because unarmed civilians pose so much of a threat to the IDF. Defense is one thing, revenge is quite another.Yes, the IDF's weapons have caused civilians deaths, and so did NATO's weapons, so did any other Western army's weapons really.
Israel is not unique in this case, and the Israeli right to self defense is definitely existent and undeniable.
Actually it does, even though the IDF figures point at 295 civilians killed, around 900 is also considered to be very low when considering the number of bombs dropped in the area.Can you provide me proof that Al-Jazeera English is skewed or seriously biased?Were I referring to the specific report's inaccuracy I would gladly take the time to review it for you.
I was merely speaking on the fact that you've chosen al-Jazeera as your source over other sources.
And how, again, does this justify attacking civilians, UN convoys, and UN buildings?Where militants target Israeli civilians from.
It shouldnt have happened at all, if the IDF is a professional army why were they attacking schools, civilian supply lines, UN supply depots for civilians, and other UN facilities.Frequently?
During the operation there was only one major hit on a UN facility.
I remind you that the Gaza Strip is one of the biggest host of UN facilities.
How in the name of hell do you accidentally hit over a thousand civilians and half a dozen UN structures?Civilians and UN personnel were not targeted.
They were hit, as a result of being in a war-zone.
Obviously not because of their fault, but because of the ones who've made it a war zone, the terrorist organization of Hamas.
My point is that Israel's invasion seems more like a stab at revenge, not security.The terrorists pick the zone where they'll launch a rocket or attack Israel from, it's not like Israel simply drops a bomb on a convoy because it hates the UN or whatever you're trying to draw here.