- Joined
- Sep 25, 2005
- Messages
- 15,675
- Reaction score
- 2,979
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Let's suppose it was a man that was twittering spanking his son, would you feel any different?
Yes I would.
Let's suppose it was a man that was twittering spanking his son, would you feel any different?
Guess what? Calling her actions responsible or irresponsible is a matter of subjective opinion. It is my opinion that she acted irresponsibly, and that her twittering was designed to drama whore things up. You know what's cool about opinions? We each get one.
Guess what? Calling her actions responsible or irresponsible is a matter of subjective opinion. It is my opinion that she acted irresponsibly, and that her twittering was designed to drama whore things up. You know what's cool about opinions? We each get one.
Even though the risk of her giving birth to another "special needs" child (which could mean a whole host of things, including relatively benign diagnoses like ADD) is unknown, she chose to go the route that would cause her child to end up dead a 100% certainty.Moreover, she clearly stated she didn't want to have another child because she didn't want to go through the risk of giving birth to another child with a birth defect.
Yeah, just like you think all lawyers are morally repugnant. :roll:
“I’m doing this so other women know, ‘Hey, it’s not nearly as terrifying as I had myself worked up thinking it was.’ It’s just not that bad,” Jackson said on her YouTube video.
Woman twitters her abortion via RU486.
Angie Jackson live-tweets her abortion to 'demystify' procedure, receives death threats
Okay so what do people think of this? Support it? Think she's nuts?
When I saw the headline, I was appalled. I thought, "People are twittering abortions?" :shock: One of the reasons she said she did it was to demystify the process. You know, that reason, I understand, and I kind of support what she did. I could see that being something that would help a woman decide whether she could take that pill.
Woman twitters her abortion via RU486.
Angie Jackson live-tweets her abortion to 'demystify' procedure, receives death threats
Okay so what do people think of this? Support it? Think she's nuts?
When I saw the headline, I was appalled. I thought, "People are twittering abortions?" :shock: One of the reasons she said she did it was to demystify the process. You know, that reason, I understand, and I kind of support what she did. I could see that being something that would help a woman decide whether she could take that pill.
Even though the risk of her giving birth to another "special needs" child (which could mean a whole host of things, including relatively benign diagnoses like ADD) is unknown, she chose to go the route that would cause her child to end up dead a 100% certainty.
Boatloads of responsibility shown there, folks. :shock:
But you act like yours is the only right opinion. You claimed my opinion about the jfk thing was wrong and yours was right. I understand that your opinions are right in your eyes, but that was not wha you implied in that thread. Just sayin'.
If she knows she doesn't want another child, it seems like not protecting herself is an irresponsible act.
Even though the risk of her giving birth to another "special needs" child (which could mean a whole host of things, including relatively benign diagnoses like ADD) is unknown, she chose to go the route that would cause her child to end up dead a 100% certainty.
Boatloads of responsibility shown there, folks. :shock:
Where did the special needs child thing come from? I watched the entire interview on CNN and I never saw that? FOX? All I heard was she nearly died from her last pregnancy and her doctor said she should not get pregnant again.
Yep.Did I say that?
You should probably get some therapy for that.You remind me of the ass-u-me saying. :doh
Agreed! When asked if he got pregnant again if she would have another abortion her response was, "yes." I'm sorry but that is about as irresponsible as you can get. Using an abortion for birth control when she could just have her tubes tied or her boyfriend could have a vasectomy. Come on.
The woman is a f'ing idiot and broadcasting that to the world to boot.
It's in the original article. And, if the above is true, not having her tubes tied is incredibly irresponsible, for her own health.
This isn't the act of someone just trying to "demystify" abortion. In the news story she says
But how would she know that before she had the procedure? That doesn't make any sense. If she had really worked herself up into thinking that it would really be that bad, then how could she say that she was just doing it to "demystify" it? She started twittering the experience before she actually went through with it. So if the abortion had been bad, would she have still put it up, and told the "audience" that it really was that bad, and recommend that they not go through with it?
I have to agree with others that said she's an attention seeker.
You should probably get some therapy for that.
Your post makes no sense to me. I have no idea what a woman goes through when taking the RU 486 pill. Now I do. She has demystified it for me. Sure, my doctor can tell me, "You'll feel cramping. It will be uncomfortable. Blah blah blah blah." But now I know exactly how someone felt when taking the pill--not through a doctor.
(I have no intention of taking that pill.)
Not everyone can afford to have their tubes tied.
This is an ever growing problem in today's politics, and especially here. People just can not, or refuse,to, see any points from the other side. And with an issue like abortion, the level of stuborness multiplies.
It's not significantly more expensive than an abortion.
She took the abortion pill.