Re: A liberal Dem and a blood libel
I was commenting on the author of the OP's article's lack of "good journalistic manner". Everyone pretty much agreed that the women is a looney, I didn't see the use of me joining the chorus. Then I made a very simple general truth statement: "just because something isn't covered, doesn't mean it's untrue". I can't see what's objectionable about that statement or that anyone can even disagree with it, so I don't understand the passive-aggressive responses.
Originally Posted by Gardener
Last edited by nonpareil; 02-14-10 at 04:01 AM.