I don't like to assume what people are thinking, so I ask questions to further my understanding of their thoughts and positions. Not making assumptions apparently offends you, so I'll try to do it more.(I figure I'll just use what is apparently now The Makeout Hobo's standard method of posting, which is to not actually answer anything or address anything but just ask questions.)
The military spending in large part came from his war in Iraq, which was not needed or necessary. If he had just focused on Afghanistan, that would have saved a lot of money from the deficeit.Do you disagree that in part much of the spending under Bush prior to 2006 was for military expenditures that came about because of his stance on the War on Terror which occured due to 9/11 which was in part inherited by extremely flawed policies and decisions of the prior administration?
I get what you're trying to do here, and you'd think a mod would be more mature, but I digress. The point is, we're facing the worst economic times since the great depression, and these were all problems that happened under Bush's watch. Bush had years to see problems like the housing bubble pop, and he did damn little about them. Yes, congress didn't help, but remind me where the buck stops again? Give Obama more time for things to work, it's petty and partisan how people have been trying to blame Obama for how things are since the day he took office.(lets see just how far we can use the "lets not answer anything and ask questions and blame the one before" to go back in time. Here, you get to now not bother to answer anything and tie it Bush I. I wonder how far back we'll get with the blame game)