• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama State of the Union

The impeachment was not supported by a 2/3 majority, therefore it contained no punitive actions.

Why is it when Republicans violate the law they resign but liberals violating the law stay in office and basically fight by smearing the accusers?
 
Why is it when Republicans violate the law they resign but liberals violating the law stay in office and basically fight by smearing the accusers?

Why is it that republicans pardon the criminals from within their ranks?
 
Why is it when Republicans violate the law they resign but liberals violating the law stay in office and basically fight by smearing the accusers?

I am waiting for Governor Sanford of SC to resign. I saw his wife on the Larry King show and the guy is a real douche bag.
 
Why is it that republicans pardon the criminals from within their ranks?

What purpose would a trial of Richard Nixon had served? His actions weren't nearly as bad as Clinton's and you know it or do you have such a short memory as to what actually happened.

Watergate was a stupid blunder on Nixon's part especially since he was winning by double digits. His coverup was the crime compared to Clinton lying under oath which underminds our entire legal system.

Nixon resigned from office, Clinton is now a hero to the left. Make sense to you? Of course it does
 
I am waiting for Governor Sanford of SC to resign. I saw his wife on the Larry King show and the guy is a real douche bag.

yeah, so am I, nice spin. I don't support Sanford, but please tell me how Sanford affects you?
 
What purpose would a trial of Richard Nixon had served? His actions weren't nearly as bad as Clinton's and you know it or do you have such a short memory as to what actually happened.

Watergate was a stupid blunder on Nixon's part especially since he was winning by double digits. His coverup was the crime compared to Clinton lying under oath which underminds our entire legal system.

Nixon resigned from office, Clinton is now a hero to the left. Make sense to you? Of course it does

I am not even going to argue if that's the way you think. I will say that I know you are wrong.
 
Probably the same way that clinton affect you.

Now that is true liberal logic and ignores that Clinton was President of the United States and Sanford IS Governor of S.C.

Do you need someone to explain the difference to you? I don't live in S.C. but I do live in the United States.
 
That's a personal insult but I will not rat you out.

Actually it is a personal observation based upon your posts. Sorry if you perceive it as a personal attack as that isn't the intent. I am trying to understand how someone your age can have the views you have in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
 
Actually it is a personal observation based upon your posts. Sorry if you perceive it as a personal attack as that isn't the intent. I am trying to understand how someone your age can have the views you have in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Why? Just because you say so?
 
I am not even going to argue if that's the way you think. I will say that I know you are wrong.

I would have to agree. Clinton's indescretions pale in comparison to Nixon's. Not even in the same league. Not even close.
 
I would have to agree. Clinton's indescretions pale in comparison to Nixon's. Not even in the same league. Not even close.

So lying under oath and obstruction of justice pale to covering up a break in to the DNC headquarters? Ok, got it
 
So lying under oath and obstruction of justice pale to covering up a break in to the DNC headquarters? Ok, got it

Not trying to beat a dead horse here but do you feel the same about Libby obstructing justice too?

But I seriously can't understand why you would considered someone lying, after being backed into a corner, about a blow-job and cheating on his wife, even comparable to heading up a team that utilizes burgulary, theft, and obstruction of justice to advance their causes.

Don't add up. And you're a smart guy too. If you were some of these other "conservatives" that grace us with their presence here every day, I would understand. But you're not. That's what has me so puzzled. :confused:
 
Goes with the territory.

What facts do you want me to show you? All are verifiable, economic data comes from BEA.gov, Unemployment comes from BLS.gov and the debt information comes from the U.S. Treasury Website.

Let's at least be discussing the same issues and stay on the thread topic.

Love being double and triple teamed here by people incapable of actually doing their own research.
 
What facts do you want me to show you? All are verifiable, economic data comes from BEA.gov, Unemployment comes from BLS.gov and the debt information comes from the U.S. Treasury Website.

Let's at least be discussing the same issues and stay on the thread topic.

Love being double and triple teamed here by people incapable of actually doing their own research.

Not my battle. I was merely commenting to LA that assuming to "know it all" is somewhat symptomatic to the more extreme rightists. But, I never considered you to be one of those guys. You and I agree on a lot more than we disagree on. But I do see your opinions pretty much falling down the party line regardless of their validity, on more occassions than not.
 
Not trying to beat a dead horse here but do you feel the same about Libby obstructing justice too?

But I seriously can't understand why you would considered someone lying, after being backed into a corner, about a blow-job and cheating on his wife, even comparable to heading up a team that utilizes burgulary, theft, and obstruction of justice to advance their causes.

Don't add up. And you're a smart guy too. If you were some of these other "conservatives" that grace us with their presence here every day, I would understand. But you're not. That's what has me so puzzled. :confused:

Because lying under oath is a violation of the law regardless of the topic. Susan Weber Wright thought so as well.
 
So lying under oath and obstruction of justice pale to covering up a break in to the DNC headquarters? Ok, got it

Secret bombing of cambodia. Lots more in the nixon tapes. Why do you think ford pardoned him/ Even his vice president was the biggest crook in american history. Don't forget about nixon's McCarthy days. He made a rep chasing invisible commies and then opened up trade with communist china.
 
Secret bombing of cambodia. Lots more in the nixon tapes. Why do you think ford pardoned him. Even his vice president was the biggest crook in american history. Don't forget about nixon's McCarthy days. He made a rep chasing invisible commies and then opened up trade with communist china.

Nixon is out of office and Dead. Can't let it go, can you? Want to start a Nixon thread, go for it, but this thread is about Obama. You certainly do have a very selective memory that somehow focuses on the past and ignores the present.
 
What facts do you want me to show you? All are verifiable, economic data comes from BEA.gov, Unemployment comes from BLS.gov and the debt information comes from the U.S. Treasury Website.

Let's at least be discussing the same issues and stay on the thread topic.

Love being double and triple teamed here by people incapable of actually doing their own research.

You are not being tripled teamed. BM is here, too, or at least he was.
 
Back
Top Bottom