Donc, what is it that the liberals have over you and so many others just like you? This is like a cult following where facts don't matter and actual projections are facts. You do not seem to have a clue as to what you are talking about or even reading.donc;1058596629]Most of the money is spent by those who have the least, therefore they are the ones gen up the economy.
The chart doesn’t lie, if you take exception with it, post something besides your opinion.As for as the date it is within the dates that were discussing.
The article is dated April 2004 and MAKES PROJECTIONS about the future using the assumptions that economic activity will remain the same throughout the future. there is no assurance that would happen.
You don't seem to understand that projections aren't actual facts and real facts come from actual economic activity. It is frustrating when I am talking to someone who hasn't a clue but that seems to be the case with all Obama supporters.
You really have a lot invested in hatred for the past Administration. All of it seems to be based upon ignorance. Don't know who you are listening to but you don't have a clue as to how our economy works, how we have three equal branches of govt. and that our economy is built on free enterprise and capitalism. You could help yourself a lot by going to the Bureau of Economic Analysis for economic numbers, Bureau of Labor Statistics for employment numbers, and the U.S. Treasury for spending and revenue. That would make you at least a little better educated.All of the above just shows what lunatics we had in charge, that would put in tax-cuts during trying times like that. When we had an incompetent administration, operating under Vice president five deferments, mantra of” deficits don’t matter” followed up with Medicare part D,no offsets+no negotiating with big pharma on drug prices, plus starting a useless war, again with no offsets, then to cap it off with two tax cuts You don’t see the mad hatter in any of this s***.
That unprecedented spending has been put on steroids by the current President yet I don't see any outrage. I will be the first to admit that Bush should have vetoed some of that spending but didn't. Now we have a President who is spending more in two years than Bush spent in 8 yet not a word.Why didn’t he find something to veto rather than increasing the debt? Surely their was something he could have vetoed in eight years of unprecedented spending.
No, I will be more than happy to discuss all 8 years of the Bush Administration but you cannot seem to discuss the topic of this thread which is Obama and all his spending. Talking to you though is like talking to one of my grandkids as you don't understand anything about the fiscal year of the U.S. and the affect Congress has on the budget. You simply don't want to know.Seeing as how you want to talk about deficits; how about this little factoid.
< The first seven years of the G.W. Bush presidency increased the deficit by half again as much as the 32 years from JFK through G.H.W.Bush combined, and somewhat more than the 24 years from Harding through FDR combined (remember, this is in inflation-adjusted dollars).>
but of course you want to discuss bushes last two years eh?
There is nothing here that I need to address with you because you simply aren't smart enough to understand the data in this chart. Why do you believe projections and ignore actual results?Better look at this first though. Careful what you say, as I know where it came from and it has more damnable evidence of complete incompetency.