• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Hiller Instinct: Suffolk University Poll (Coakley-Brown)

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
The Hiller Instinct - Suffolk University Poll

Coakley is not being helped by her pledge to help pass the Democrat's national health care bill. Fifty-one percent of likely voters here say no to it while 36% say yes. Sixty-one percent think Washington can't afford it.

It's not just Coakley...
...Ugh... it's Obama's economy stupid.

In November, Coakley was beating Brown by 31 percentage points. Now, Brown is up by 4% -- a change of 35% in two months.

.
 
Last edited:
Fifty-one percent of likely voters here say no to it

Sixty-one percent think Washington can't afford it.

Anyone else see a problem here?
 
There is no problem.
They were different questions, which should have been obvious.

I meant the fact that 10% of respondents don't think we can afford it, but are still not against it
 
I meant the fact that 10% of respondents don't think we can afford it, but are still not against it

We can not afford two unconstitutional wars, either but that did not stop us.

My suggestion is stop the wars and then we will be able to afford it.
 
Coakley should be running from another state, because Massachusetts has the most to lose of any state in the union.
 
Back
Top Bottom