• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin to Contribute to Fox News

You do know that a blog is not a credible link right?

Hello in my post Sherlock? Now tell me out of the list how many companies are advertising on Beck's show?
 
Hello in my post Sherlock? Now tell me out of the list how many companies are advertising on Beck's show?

I don't know, I change the channel until the commercial is over......

Now tell me why would a company advertise on MSNBC when no one is watching that channel and he can get much more visibility on Fox?
 
Hello in my post Sherlock? Now tell me out of the list how many companies are advertising on Beck's show?

Does it matter?

5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
522 452 422 403 336 427 334

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Tonight: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
128 146 158 147 195 198 181
:rofl
 
Last edited:
If Fox has ratings, then advertizers will buy time on the network.

Are you all suggesting that various points of view should be suppressed in the mass media? That's what I'm hearing here, that Fox is such a dangerous apostate network, that advertisers should not give them their business.

And you accuse the right wing of wanting to suppress rights and freedom of expression?
 
I don't know, I change the channel until the commercial is over......

Now tell me why would a company advertise on MSNBC when no one is watching that channel and he can get much more visibility on Fox?

Advertising depends on a lot of things. One of the main ones is the demographics of the viewer. Advertisers generally want the 18-49 year old crowd. I suspect that Fauxnews probably does not do well in the demographic group.
Also the area of the country is also controlling. Again, I suspect that most FauxNews viewers come from the more sparsely populated red states.
The larger cities where more commerce is conducted are generally more democratic and thus probably more appealing to advertisers.

I'm certain that Life Insurance, Viagra, hearing aids, etc...probably sell very well for the Fox Advertiser.
 
If Fox has ratings, then advertizers will buy time on the network.

Wrong, advertisers look for a return on their investment. If on channel B an advertiser gets a 1 % return yet on channel A yeilds a 1.5% return.......
 
Who is talking about hate..........When a personality makes a comment like that to me his creditability is zero and judging by the ratings I think a lot of people feel the same way........One more thing, Fox could never have the high rating without the help of a lot of liberals watching their shows.........

Of course they couldn't I know many democrats that watch Fox.

It's much more enjoyable to watch a speaker you don't agree with then it is one you do agree with.
 
Advertising depends on a lot of things. One of the main ones is the demographics of the viewer. Advertisers generally want the 18-49 year old crowd. I suspect that Fauxnews probably does not do well in the demographic group.
Also the area of the country is also controlling. Again, I suspect that most FauxNews viewers come from the more sparsely populated red states.
The larger cities where more commerce is conducted are generally more democratic and thus probably more appealing to advertisers.

I'm certain that Life Insurance, Viagra, hearing aids, etc...probably sell very well for the Fox Advertiser.

You suspect huh but you don't know the demographics on any network......Bottom line is the more people that watch a network the better chance for a company to sell their product.........

Nice try though.........:lol:
 
Of course they couldn't I know many democrats that watch Fox.

It's much more enjoyable to watch a speaker you don't agree with then it is one you do agree with.

As long as they make sense..........I feel that Oberman and Matthews are so full of hate for Conservatives that they no longer can participate in a reasonable debate.......
 
Advertising depends on a lot of things. One of the main ones is the demographics of the viewer. Advertisers generally want the 18-49 year old crowd. I suspect that Fauxnews probably does not do well in the demographic group.
Also the area of the country is also controlling. Again, I suspect that most FauxNews viewers come from the more sparsely populated red states.
The larger cities where more commerce is conducted are generally more democratic and thus probably more appealing to advertisers.

I'm certain that Life Insurance, Viagra, hearing aids, etc...probably sell very well for the Fox Advertiser.

You're sooooo clever, calling them 'Faux News'! :rofl It must be because you're so enlightened and young, not over the hill like those nasty Fox News viewers.
 
You're sooooo clever, calling them 'Faux News'! :rofl It must be because you're so enlightened and young, not over the hill like those nasty Fox News viewers.

Faux News... that's NEW! I've NEVER heard that one before!
 
Faux News... that's NEW! I've NEVER heard that one before!
ME NEITHER!
This DisneyDude, he's some special guy to be incredibly original like that!

He's really cool... :cool:
 
As long as they make sense..........I feel that Oberman and Matthews are so full of hate for Conservatives that they no longer can participate in a reasonable debate.......

Same can be said about Hannity and Beck.
 
As long as they make sense..........I feel that Oberman and Matthews are so full of hate for Conservatives that they no longer can participate in a reasonable debate.......

You forgot that Maddow chick.

They are as bad as any Hannity, O'Reilly or Beck, if you ask me. Just talking head blowhards bent on purposely dividing America for ratings.

Sometimes I wonder if MSNBC and FOX is that commie propaganda we were warned about in the 60's. Conquer from within.
 
Same can be said about Hannity and Beck.

I can't speak for Beck......I haven't watched him long enough to make a decision..........I will say that Hannity at least has Liberal guests on his show every night and does not denigrade them like Matthews does...I truly believe Oberman is missing a few.....I have never seen a man filled with so much hate and I have never watched the woman at 6 pacific time...I am usally watching Larry King or Hannity.....

Liberals that appear regularly on Fox.....Mona Lyason, Juan Williams, Bob (forget his last name)Alan Colmes, Greta Vanhusen, etc.. That is one of the reasons Fox is so popular, you liberals hate to hear it but they are fair and balanced.....The other two news networks are not .......
 
Sarah Palin is a gimmick, through and through. I mean She's adressing a wine and liquor convention in vegas Soon.
 
Sarah Palin is a gimmick, through and through. I mean She's adressing a wine and liquor convention in vegas Soon.

Hey man, that's GREAT work when you can get it. <hic.> :3oops:
 
Sarah Palin is a gimmick, through and through. I mean She's adressing a wine and liquor convention in vegas Soon.

Another far out lefty calling names and insulting.Nothing new there for the future senator from Alaska..........Book it...........
 
Another far out lefty calling names and insulting.Nothing new there for the future senator from Alaska..........Book it...........

Sir. I'm sorry, I am a South African British Canadian with no interest in your partisan squabbling. Sarah Palin is simply an idiot. From a completely independant point of view, she has no serious place in politics, she is and always will be a gimmick.
 
Sarah Palin was magnificent on FOX News tonight. She was engaging, glib, and insightful. She is going to be an even bigger star!
 
Sir. I'm sorry, I am a South African British Canadian with no interest in your partisan squabbling. Sarah Palin is simply an idiot. From a completely independant point of view, she has no serious place in politics, she is and always will be a gimmick.

Just like Facebook needs one, there should be a dislike button here. Or perhaps a "no thanks" button. :2razz:
 
Palin going on fox-tv means more soundbites to have fun with.

The question is who is she going to blame now? Before it was that tough Katie Couric and then it was the McCain camp. She blamed all those lawsuits in Alaska making her quit her governorship.

Am glad so many here are in lock step with her. It will be fun watching them explain her ignorance.
 
Back
Top Bottom