• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-Life Advocates Plan to Protest Opening of Largest Abortion Clinic in U.S

Redress said:
The point was that the Rev was "sickened" by something he did not have all the facts for. Notice that he did not respond when I gave additional details about the building.

You've got to be kidding me.

He has is own beliefs and anything you say doesn't really matter because of it. It doesn't matter what the rest of the building is used for because he doesn't care. And yes he's being biased by painting the situation in the way he did, but so is everybody.

I actually agree with Reverend because asking for "unbiased" news is absurd; such news doesn't exist.

God, here I am agreeing with Reverend and I support late term abortions. This is ridiculous.
 
Yeah, I found that amusing too. Why even bring up the lesbian mayor when it had exactly zero to do with the story?

Everyone knows that lesbians wash their hair with ground up placentas from aborted fetuses.
 
You've got to be kidding me.

He has is own beliefs and anything you say doesn't really matter because of it. It doesn't matter what the rest of the building is used for because he doesn't care. And yes he's being biased by painting the situation in the way he did, but so is everybody.

I actually agree with Reverend because asking for "unbiased" news is absurd; such news doesn't exist.

God, here I am agreeing with Reverend and I support late term abortions. This is ridiculous.





Everytime you agree with the Greatness that is the Good Reverend, an angel gets its wings. :thumbs:
 
You've got to be kidding me.

He has is own beliefs and anything you say doesn't really matter because of it. It doesn't matter what the rest of the building is used for because he doesn't care. And yes he's being biased by painting the situation in the way he did, but so is everybody.

I actually agree with Reverend because asking for "unbiased" news is absurd; such news doesn't exist.

God, here I am agreeing with Reverend and I support late term abortions. This is ridiculous.

I did not ask for an unbiased news source, I pointed out the bias in the source provided. Is there somehow something wrong with pointing out that a source is biased and not giving all the details?
 
The point was that the Rev was "sickened" by something he did not have all the facts for. Notice that he did not respond when I gave additional details about the building.





I don't respond to irrellevant nonsense usually. I am only concerned with the part of the building in question, If it housed a mcdonalds, a brothel, and a church, it would be irrellevant....


This game you are playing is not norris trophy worthy. :lol:
 
There is a USA today article on this abortion clinic?





Are you trying to convince me you are of substandard intelligence? It's not working, know you are smarter than this statement. :2razz:



You know what I mean, lets not play obtuse.
 
I don't respond to irrellevant nonsense usually. I am only concerned with the part of the building in question, If it housed a mcdonalds, a brothel, and a church, it would be irrellevant....


This game you are playing is not norris trophy worthy. :lol:

You still do not have all the facts, you have accusations by biased people. Is the place really doing late term abortions? We do not know. I pointed out that there are important details not mentioned in your article, but you assume it is true and are "sickened".

Your game is not worthy of a Vezina trophy.:mrgreen:
 
Are you trying to convince me you are of substandard intelligence? It's not working, know you are smarter than this statement. :2razz:



You know what I mean, lets not play obtuse.

No I do not. I am legitimately confused. My objection is why bring up the mayor in a story that has nothing to do with her. You link to another story about the mayor, which still has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and then mention a USA today article. We are missing each other somewhere in the process.
 
Sec. 171.004. ABORTION OF FETUS AGE 16 WEEKS OR MORE. An abortion of a fetus age 16 weeks or more may be performed only at an ambulatory surgical center or hospital licensed to perform the abortion.



The reason for the expansion is to get around texas law apparently.
 
No I do not. I am legitimately confused. My objection is why bring up the mayor in a story that has nothing to do with her. You link to another story about the mayor, which still has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and then mention a USA today article. We are missing each other somewhere in the process.





I demonstrated that cns was not the only place to point out she likes chicks. It's an irrellevant tangent you are attempting here.
 
I demonstrated that cns was not the only place to point out she likes chicks. It's an irrellevant tangent you are attempting here.

Ok...my point was that she had nothing to do with the story, so why bring her up at all, let alone, bring her up, mention she is a lesbian, and then move onto another topic.
 
I did not attack the messenger, I pointed out a flaw with the article you linked(one sided claims). I then suggested why it might be so one sided.
So there is no late term abortion clinic opening? :confused:
 
I wish I knew how to send the Planned Parenthood top brass a serious suggestion in a way that they knew it was serious and not a joke:

They could totally provide medical services to women for absolutely free if only they would take the leftovers from each abortion and render the fat into skin-care products, the sale of which would benefit (drum-roll please) Planned Parenthood!

What, you think baby fat-based moisturizing cream wouldn't make a killing in the market?

:mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom