• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

You've still yet to demonstrate how this is happening.

Flamboyant, almost arrogant, homosexuals are the only ones I could see him being anywhere near correct about. Like, Chris Crocker. Attention whore homosexuals maybe. :lol: but even then that's a very small percentage.
 
No more than those that claim a article is bias or a bad source but will not show how it is wrong.

I'm gonna go ahead and accept that as a 'yes' because you did not answer the question and presented something completely irrelevant. So, communication is being hindered by something. Whether that something is tweaking on meth or a learning disability remains to be discovered.
 
Flamboyant, almost arrogant, homosexuals are the only ones I could see him being anywhere near correct about. Like, Chris Crocker. Attention whore homosexuals maybe. :lol: but even then that's a very small percentage.

Don't forget Perez Hilton. Nasty fat grunge faggot that he is.
 
Gays often bring it on themselves by demanding rights and trying to demand what is taught and happens in schools

I just can't imagine asserting that left-handedness is the same as right-handedness, being nothing more than a variation.
 
I placed in bold the problem with your entire argument. You are basing your position on your own morals...of which you offer nothing factual. You seem like another with an anti-gay position who can neither prove his position, provide facts, and depends on his own morals to base his position on. Very poor debating, and a complete non-winner. Please try to come up with something with a tad more substance.

Just thought I would bump this post up. Just an FYI, CC is a mental health care professional.
 
EXACTLY! I thought the crap he pulled with that Miss America thing was bull**** and he did it just for attention.

That's all he ever does. If there's one person in this world that I really, honestly, truly think deserves to be waterboarded to death with buckets of molded weasel spunk, it's Perez Hilton.
 
Yep and posting it again isn't going to change that. It's a biased slant that does not explore the subject objectively.

A great deal of the studies he cited were based on faulty sampling groups. If you go to people in therapy already, you are going to find people with problems that require therapy.

Show proof
 
You've still yet to demonstrate how this is happening.

I haven't. We have gay days and gay parades and day of silence and GLSEN dictating that gay agendas be taught, we have gay lobby groups pushing gay marriage and gays when votes are that marriage is between a man and a woman that claim it is unconstitutional.
 
Public schools messed me up by their insipid curricula, and the loss of the requirement that school children be able to produce their assignments in Latin or Classical Greek upon demand.

As I've said before, the Federal Government, probably the State Governments as well should be barred from operating schools, which will inevitably become institutions of social and political indoctrination.
 
Last edited:
I haven't.

I know. And that's the whole problem with your "logic". You haven't demonstrated anything. You've jsut randomly bitched about random **** and tried to pin it all on "teh gays".

WTF?
 
I'm gonna go ahead and accept that as a 'yes' because you did not answer the question and presented something completely irrelevant. So, communication is being hindered by something. Whether that something is tweaking on meth or a learning disability remains to be discovered.

I answered you did not like my answer
 
What do you want, a crash course in logic?

I already demonstrated the fault with some of those studies. Refute it or concede it.

What the **** is your problem?

Show me where a post # will do
 
Show me where a post # will do

The one where I said if you sample from people in therapy, you are going to get a large number of people who have problems that would require therapy.

What the **** so hard for you to understand in that?
 
The one where I said if you sample from people in therapy, you are going to get a large number of people who have problems that would require therapy.

What the **** so hard for you to understand in that?

Thats not proof
 
Thats not proof

This is the flaw in the sources you are using. Mental health problems reported in homosexuals where because those who where being studies where ones with mental health problems. Once they started comparing normal gays, all of a sudden, it became clear that they where as mentally healthy as strait people.

There was a similar procedural flaw with your gay life expectancy source, and the OP to this whole thread was cherry picking to make things look bad. You have not proved your points in this thread, in fact you have not proved a single point. You have intentionally ignored every fact that points out the flaws in your reasoning.

I think it is time to once again bring out my smiley friend: :2brickwal
 
What about a psychologist?
Are you not capable of presenting an argument or what is the problem?

The main thrust of this article which is published on a page called "Opinion", and states in capital letters VIEWPOINT--in the title, is to argue against allowing gay-clubs on campus, because apparently any gay-club promotes a "destructive and deadly lifestyle" - homosexual behaviour spreads diseases, an "average" homosexual has 20-100 sexual partners per year.
Which diseases would this be, well, gay men are more likely to contract AIDS, and...wait for it: homos are responsible for 60% of Syphilis cases!

Should parents be alarmed about gay-clubs spreading syphilis then? - hardly, there were 46.000 cases total in the US in 2008 - 3.8 cases per 100.000 population, lol,
2.180 out of 3.141 US counties reported no case at all.

Those gay-clubs are a real danger!!! :lol:

Other "facts" include that 33% of homos have had minor-adult sex and one in 20 is a child molester.

The author refers to no specific sources for her claims and figures, but mentions that notorious National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality in passing.

Oh, and did you know that:
"Most studies now agree that the incidence of genetically determined homosexuality is lower than previously estimated, falling somewhere between 2-3 percent."
When did they discover and verify that sexual orientations is genetically determined? lol

I hope you are just trolling and do not actually believe is drivel by this "school psychologist"

I have shown the risks. If they are going to teach about homosexuality then the health risks including depression should be taught also
No, you have not. You have linked to an article which alleges risks based on unsourced figures.

If that was the case would it not be easy to show why it is wrong?
You still fail to understand that it is not everybody else's responsibility to research every claim posted on the web to prove it is not factual or inaccurately presented - it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to scrutinise material before you link to it or parrot the claims.
One way of creating credibility is to use quality sources, or at the very least avoid those which are known to have an agenda and do not reference the claims.

You have failed consistently to show
 
Thats not proof
Yes, it is. It's a logical proof.

You just are not good at this, are you?

Do you remember that SpungeBob cartoon I posted the other day?

Oh here it is...

This sums up the typical BN thread nicely:


it_s_not_my_wallet.jpg
 
This is the flaw in the sources you are using. Mental health problems reported in homosexuals where because those who where being studies where ones with mental health problems. Once they started comparing normal gays, all of a sudden, it became clear that they where as mentally healthy as strait people.

There was a similar procedural flaw with your gay life expectancy source, and the OP to this whole thread was cherry picking to make things look bad. You have not proved your points in this thread, in fact you have not proved a single point. You have intentionally ignored every fact that points out the flaws in your reasoning.

I think it is time to once again bring out my smiley friend: :2brickwal

Show proof
 
Back
Top Bottom