• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

ptif219 said:
Thousands of Schools Participate in GLSEN’s 10th Annual Day of Silence


What other reason do they use to promote homosexuality in the schools?
Click to expand...

Advice: read the damn source material:

New York, NY - April 26, 2006 - GLSEN, or the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, today kicks-off the 10th national Day of Silence®, among the largest student-led actions in American history. An estimated 500,000 students at 4,000 schools nationwide are participating in GLSEN’s Day of Silence to peacefully bring attention to the pervasive problem of anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) bullying and harassment in schools.
Click to expand...

OH MY GOD, GLSEN is promoting gays rights to not get beat up....THOSE COMMIES!
 
EpicDude86 said:
You get me so hott when you get all worked up like that. No..NO! STOP TURNING ME BENT, DAMN YOU JALLMAN!
Click to expand...

Well, it's just...

I don't like stupid people, okay? I am prejudiced against stupid people. I especially don't like stupid people that attempt to step outside their lot in life as a stupid person and enter into discussions more complex than the Cosmo quiz. I just can't stand it when a stupid person gets the internet and someone let's them know there is more to it than Slinko, myspace mafia wars, and internet pr0n. And then they get all uppity and end up here and I have to deal with another stupid person infecting the forum.
 
ptif219 said:
Should we not want people to stay away from a harmful lifestyle. So then if I can afford cocaine and cause no one else harm I should be allowed to do it?
Click to expand...

You have yet to prove it is a harmful lifestyle. And you are changing the subject. Regardless, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to do drugs if they harm no one. The fact that you would actually compare being gay to doing cocaine pretty much says it all.
 
ptif219 said:
Should we not want people to stay away from a harmful lifestyle. So then if I can afford cocaine and cause no one else harm I should be allowed to do it?
Click to expand...

Cocaine abuse...Homosexuality

Cocaine...buttsex

Cocaine...Male on Male Fellatio

Ehhhhhhh....
 
Dr_Patrick said:
You have yet to prove it is a harmful lifestyle. And you are changing the subject. Regardless, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to do drugs if they harm no one. The fact that you would actually compare being gay to doing cocaine pretty much says it all.
Click to expand...

What's funny is if he ever asked me my views on gays and school, I would give him real ammo to go nuts on. I am far far far far far far far left on gay issues.
 
Redress said:
What's funny is if he ever asked me my views on gays and school, I would give him real ammo to go nuts on. I am far far far far far far far left on gay issues.
Click to expand...

That's funny, too. Because I actually am gay and I am probably just right of center on most gay issues.
 
jallman said:
That's funny, too. Because I actually am gay and I am probably just right of center on most gay issues.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know...I am more militantly gay than most gay people despite being strait...go figure.
 
ptif219 said:
You mean you want to deny his history
Click to expand...
I have repeatedly pointed out a specific example from your sources which is a blatant lie.
You chose to ignore it and instead accuse me of wanting to deny "his history" - your comments are dishonest, offensive and an insult to other people's intelligence.

ptif219 said:
Should we not want people to stay away from a harmful lifestyle. So then if I can afford cocaine and cause no one else harm I should be allowed to do it?
Click to expand...
You have not even attempted to show what is "harmful" - there is no such thing as a uniform gay life-style.
"Fisting", for example, is not characteristic of homosexuals. Your ignorance is astonishing and offensive.


This entire thread is yet another excuse to spout anti-homosexual propaganda in form of half-truth and smears. Opinion pieces from partisan sources and your prejudices/assumptions are not "facts".
 
ptif219 said:
Should we not want people to stay away from a harmful lifestyle. So then if I can afford cocaine and cause no one else harm I should be allowed to do it?
Click to expand...

yes, it is your body, your choice.

Edit to to show how silly this argument is:

If I can afford a triple stack cheeseburger and a large fry everyday, should I be allowed to do it even though it is undoubtedly a harmful lifestyle.
 
Last edited:
^
What exatly is supposed to be harmful about being homosexual?
 
roderic said:
^
What exatly is supposed to be harmful about being homosexual?
Click to expand...


Are you asking me? I am not the one making that claim.

I am just showing how weak his argument that just because something is perceived as harmful to an individual it should be disallowed is.
 
ptif219 said:
Why do you keep trying to spin and twist what I say. If there was no book list there would not be this thread.

The GLSEN is over taking the schools with their agenda, just like their day of silence. They use discrimination and bullying as an excuse to promote that being gay is normal and ok. It is not.
Click to expand...

I placed in bold the problem with your entire argument. You are basing your position on your own morals...of which you offer nothing factual. You seem like another with an anti-gay position who can neither prove his position, provide facts, and depends on his own morals to base his position on. Very poor debating, and a complete non-winner. Please try to come up with something with a tad more substance.
 
ptif219 said:
Should we not want people to stay away from a harmful lifestyle. So then if I can afford cocaine and cause no one else harm I should be allowed to do it?
Click to expand...

If you cause no harm to anyone other than yourself, absolutely you should be allowed to do it...unless you are for supporting a nanny state. I didn't know you were a socialist.
 
Oh now he comes along and jumps in the thread. I am sooooo about to eat a three point infraction. :doh
 
jallman said:
Oh now he comes along and jumps in the thread. I am sooooo about to eat a three point infraction. :doh
Click to expand...

I skimmed the thread. Didn't see anything that made me go for the infraction button. Just some hard, aggressive debating towards someone (ptif219) who doesn't get it. I'll take another look later...maybe. For now...back to work. :mrgreen:
 
Eh, tell you what...just to make sure...

Moderator's Warning:
Let's all stop the personal attacks and the trolling. Thank you.
 
Redress said:
So you support a nanny state? Odd notion for a conservative. Since we are going to stop people from doing risky things, hunting better go away(hunting accidents) and in fact all guns(accidental shootings). Better outlaw cars, they are dangerous.

Let's go a bit further, since marriage is the number 1 requirement for divorce, we better outlaw marriage in order to save marriage. We don't want to risk those divorces.
Click to expand...
That argument can be turned around, hope you thought of that.
 
I got lost trying to follow 13 pages of assertion and counter-assertion, but the message I got from the OP is that someone is trying to push a gay agenda and pornography onto high school kids. As someone in my last years of high school, can I just make two points which I think are of relevance.

1. High school kids know more about sex than anyone is prepared to acknowledge, so no books are going to push them into sex before they are ready. (You don't do sex because someone tells you about it.)

2. It is not possible to turn anyone gay, no matter what. Not literature, nor indoctrination, nor even molestation, will turn someone gay. As a male, you cannot respond sexually to the same gender, if you are not already that way.

So I think the whole biz is a storm in a teacup. :mrgreen:
 
EpicDude86 said:
Well sodomy IS often against the law. And since homosexual men don't (often) have a vagina, that cuts their usable orifices in half...:lol:
Click to expand...

Your math is off, it is by a third.
:shocked2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom