• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

So you decide what is acceptable. Are you saying Christians lie or that they should not have freedom of speech.


More likely that is how you dodge the facts in the link.

No. The article is suspect from the beginning because it comes from a moral bias rather than objectivity.

Still no attempt at addressing the questions posed, I see.
 
So you decide what is acceptable.
Science has already done that, lying hypocrite.

Are you saying Christians lie
Habitually, as your OP proves. ;) If they didn't lie, they couldn't be Christians since they would be forced to admit that science and reality has left their religious delusions behind.

or that they should not have freedom of speech.
They have the freedom to spout deranged cultist nonsense (such as in the links you've provided), just as we have the freedom to debunk it with the facts.

More likely that is how you dodge the facts in the link.
Those "facts" have been debunked here. Liar:

APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation, Homosexuality and Bisexuality"
 
No. The article is suspect from the beginning because it comes from a moral bias rather than objectivity.

Still no attempt at addressing the questions posed, I see.

Nice way to avoid the truth and facts in the article.
 
Science has already done that, lying hypocrite.


Habitually, as your OP proves. ;) If they didn't lie, they couldn't be Christians since they would be forced to admit that science and reality has left their religious delusions behind.


They have the freedom to spout deranged cultist nonsense (such as in the links you've provided), just as we have the freedom to debunk it with the facts.


Those "facts" have been debunked here. Liar:

APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation, Homosexuality and Bisexuality"
Bumped up;)

[image]http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:vqsQBQTfHGy3HM:http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/Images/CA230_1Trever.gif[/image]
 
Last edited:
Science has already done that, lying hypocrite.


Habitually, as your OP proves. ;) If they didn't lie, they couldn't be Christians since they would be forced to admit that science and reality has left their religious delusions behind.


They have the freedom to spout deranged cultist nonsense (such as in the links you've provided), just as we have the freedom to debunk it with the facts.


Those "facts" have been debunked here. Liar:

APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation, Homosexuality and Bisexuality"

Does nothing to show my most recent links are not truthful.
 
Provide proof or quit trying to dodge the facts in my article.

He's not going to. I ran into ptif at another forum and about the only thing he is skilled at doing is bouncing from topic to topic hoping to win the debate by making you frustrated enough with his incoherence to walk away.

Don't expect a serious or even productive conversation to be had from him.
 
No one has shown where they are false.

I'd say the fact that they come from a religious page that has a clear agenda makes them questionable considering that they are biased. Are you really having that much trouble coming up with unbiased sources?
 
I'd say the fact that they come from a religious page that has a clear agenda makes them questionable considering that they are biased. Are you really having that much trouble coming up with unbiased sources?

No it does not it shows your bias.

Show where the facts are wrong
 
No it does not it shows your bias.

Show where the facts are wrong

I would say the same thing to someone who posted "proof" that came from a left wing site. So no, it has nothing to do with my bias. Nice attempt to turn it around though. :doh :lol:
 
I would say the same thing to someone who posted "proof" that came from a left wing site. So no, it has nothing to do with my bias. Nice attempt to turn it around though. :doh :lol:

This to me shows bias against Christians


I'd say the fact that they come from a religious page that has a clear agenda makes them questionable considering that they are biased.
 
This to me shows bias against Christians

Asking for unbiased sources doesn't mean that I'm biased against Christians. I actually know plenty of Christians who have no problem with gay people or gay marriage for that matter. The author of the article that you posted has a clear agenda. Again, why can't you find an unbiased source? If the things in the article that you posted are facts, as you claim, you should have no trouble finding an unbiased source.
 
This to me shows bias against Christians


I'd say the fact that they come from a religious page that has a clear agenda makes them questionable considering that they are biased.
Reality has an anti-Christian bias. I'd say that the Round Earth theory shows "bias" against the Flat Earth Society (some of whom are Christians). That doesn't change the facts.
 
Bias my ass you refuse to hear any side that disagrees with your view. I guess you have no answers to the facts in these links i post.

Let's stop for a second and make the assumption you are right, and gays do not live as long as straits. Now, the question you still have not answered...how does this harm any one but gays?
 
Asking for unbiased sources doesn't mean that I'm biased against Christians. I actually know plenty of Christians who have no problem with gay people or gay marriage for that matter. The author of the article that you posted has a clear agenda. Again, why can't you find an unbiased source? If the things in the article that you posted are facts, as you claim, you should have no trouble finding an unbiased source.

Your words say a different story to me
 
Reality has an anti-Christian bias. I'd say that the Round Earth theory shows "bias" against the Flat Earth Society (some of whom are Christians). That doesn't change the facts.

Exactly that is why I want people to dispute the facts not the source
 
And again, that list was never distributed to kids to read. It was suggested for teachers to pick and choose from if they wanted and for their own reading.

No one is handing Queer 13 to a 5th grader and saying to study it.

How do we know they are not if the GLSEN is suggesting to.
 
Let's stop for a second and make the assumption you are right, and gays do not live as long as straits. Now, the question you still have not answered...how does this harm any one but gays?

I have shown it is true you deny it. So now you don't care if gays die?
 
How do we know they are not if the GLSEN is suggesting to.


OK, for the last ****ing time for all the morons who either can't read or can't keep up:

The article YOU quoted said:
All BookLink items are reviewed by GLSEN staff for quality and appropriateness of content. However, some titles for adolescent readers contain mature themes. We recommend that adults selecting books for youth review content for suitability.

What, pray tell, is so hard about that statement that some people can't seem to get it through their thick skulls?
 
OK, for the last ****ing time for all the morons who either can't read or can't keep up:



What, pray tell, is so hard about that statement that some people can't seem to get it through their thick skulls?

How does that prevent teachers from using them in class? If that is the case why have a book list?
 
Back
Top Bottom