The anti gm side has contributed to the decline of traditional marriage by channeling money meant to preserve traditional marriage towards combating same sex marriage instead of towards alleviating the leading factors that contribute to the decline of traditional marriage, namely no fault divorce and women leaving home to work.
It is a reasonable argument to make, because if the anti gm's motive was truly to preserve traditional marriage then most if not all the money would be going toward alleviating the effects of no fault divorce and women leaving home to work on the decline of traditional marriage.
I have no idea how you have gotten on this "focus" tangent, please try to stay on topic Goobs. It seems you want me to prove that back then they had money that was meant to alleviate those factors, but as I stated awhile back, I am talking about the here and now. I don't think the traditional marriage argument was brought up until the gm debate.