Last edited by Crunch; 12-10-09 at 03:57 PM.
There is no such thing as a “Natural Born Dual-Citizen“.
Originally Posted by PogueMoran
I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read.
Then you are not looking hard enough.
Three topics in the Conspiracy section not dealing with Obama's eligibility. Only three. Two of which started there, w/one reply in each. The third got moved there, after I stop participating. Why? I have no idea it wasn't a Conspiracy theory, nor could it be called one.
As for the majority of my posts that are in the Conspiracy area.
The majority of topics dealing with the eligibility issue didn't start in the Conspiracy section, but got moved there and they were not started by me.
I only reply, like you do, to information being provided that is believed to be false.
But of course, this has nothing to do with whether Obama meets the Constitutional requirement.
I think you are projecting.
You are the one that thinks they can fool the people with your disinformation, dismissals, ridicule and predilection for being unable to stick to the specifics being discussed.
So where is your example of which you speak?
Make sure you quote me and not someone else.
I know of no birther that presents said argument.
As convoluted as the above quote appears, they are your thoughts, not mine.
Have I ever made the claim that she, or any other birther is my hero?
I think not.
So why don't you just knock off this crap and stick to what is being discussed.
Just another showing of your predilection, but I will address it anyway.
To whom are you referring?
Larry Sinclair? The guy who submitted an affidavit saying that Taitz wanted him to testify that Obama was involved in more murders that he originally claims. The same guy who swears that he had gay sex with Obama, where a latter polygraph examination indicated deception.
Or how about Lucas Smith? The guy who swears he has Obama's original Birth Certificate issued by the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa.
Here is your problem with these.
If you are to accept that their word is true, that Taitz tried unsuccessfully to get them to lie on the stand, then they are truthful people and their is no reason not to accept what they swear to in regards to other specifics. Obama being involved in a murder (Sinclair), and that Smith does indeed possess an actual Birth Certificate in Obama's name.
Now if they are lying about these other specifics, then there is no reason to believe their accusations against Taitz.
So why don't you just knock off this crap and stick to the specifics being discussed?
And again, for purposes of this specific, the Birth Certificate issue does not matter.
Although it takes evidence to establish proof, they are not one in the same.
As for evidence, it points to him not being a 'natural born Citizen' for the Constitutional requirement.
It is funny that you want me to answer your questions but ignore mine.
The Court cases stating that the term 'natural born Citizen' hasn't been defined by the Constitution have already been provided.
I would ask you for the same, but already knowing that you can not provide anything of relevance, I wont ask.
It isn't ridiculous to ask and demand clarification and proof.
But stating that Congress has ruled on the issue is absolutely false.
The resolutions that have been passed are not binding and are not law.
Good for you!
But do you mind pointing out exactly which particular argument you are speaking of, and where he destroyed said particular argument?
That way I can point out to you where you are wrong instead of just telling you that you are.