Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 84

Thread: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

  1. #21
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:32 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,027

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by The silenced majority View Post
    Congress needs to clearly define what a "natural born citizen" is, or the courts need to make a legal ruling ass to the definition of a "natural born citizen."

    Neither have happened, citizens of this country are being told that they have no legal standing to question the Constitutional qualifications of a person holding the office of the President.

    The fact that so much of the President's history has been sealed should be enough to cause any rational person to question the motives of this supposedly "transparent" leader.
    Oh my Dear God in Heaven not this again. Do you believe the earth is flat and we never went to the moon?! For God's sake! This is so ludicrous the supreme court refused to waste their time on it. Get over it. McCain and Caribou Barbee lost. Obama's our president now!



  2. #22
    Banned Coolguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Seen
    01-26-10 @ 03:40 AM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    846

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by EnigmaO01 View Post
    Oh my Dear God in Heaven not this again. Do you believe the earth is flat and we never went to the moon?! For God's sake! This is so ludicrous the supreme court refused to waste their time on it. Get over it. McCain and Caribou Barbee lost. Obama's our president now!
    Nothing of substance to add, only hyperbole? Figures.

    Nothing 'The silenced majority' said was wrong or incorrect.
    Natural born Citizen hasn't been fully defined.

    Take notice and learn.


    88 U.S. 162
    Minor v. Happersett
    Argued: February 9, 1875 --- Decided: March 29, 1875

    ...
    The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words "all children" are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as "all persons," and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.
    ...
    Minor v. Happersett

    Did you get that, or should I repeat it?
    It hasn't been fully defined.
    And if the Fourteenth Amendment applied that is where they would have turned, instead of saying the Constitution doesn't define it and turning elsewhere.
    This is a legitimate issue.
    You also need to learn why the Courts are dismissing the claims.
    It has to do with 'standing' to bring the case in the first place, not with it being ludicrous.

    Secondly, in regards to the Sct. They can only be the final arbiter in regards to these issues.
    Get back to me when you comprehend what that means.
    Last edited by Coolguy; 12-06-09 at 02:41 AM.

  3. #23
    Sage
    RDS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Last Seen
    10-10-17 @ 05:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    5,398

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    He is not nuts yet. He is merely jumping the gun. He should first deal with the war crimes commited by Bush and Cheney.

  4. #24
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:32 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,027

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by Coolguy View Post
    Nothing of substance to add, only hyperbole? Figures.

    Nothing 'The silenced majority' said was wrong or incorrect.
    Natural born Citizen hasn't been fully defined.

    Take notice and learn.



    Did you get that, or should I repeat it?
    It hasn't been fully defined.
    And if the Fourteenth Amendment applied that is where they would have turned, instead of saying the Constitution doesn't define it and turning elsewhere.
    This is a legitimate issue.
    You also need to learn why the Courts are dismissing the claims.
    It has to do with 'standing' to bring the case in the first place, not with it being ludicrous.

    Secondly, in regards to the Sct. They can only be the final arbiter in regards to these issues.
    Get back to me when you comprehend what that means.
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

  5. #25
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northeast
    Last Seen
    11-03-11 @ 08:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by EnigmaO01 View Post
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
    Yeah "coolguy" had this explained to him already down in the conspiracy theory threads he just keeps posting the same crap to different people as if he doesn't know this **** was explained.

  6. #26
    Professor
    formerroadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    06-23-10 @ 08:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    2,014

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by EpicDude86 View Post
    I know it's Canada Free Press, but still, the guy will be delivering his evidence on Dec. 1. Enjoy. Now, before I get the usual liberal ****storm, please remember I"m just posting this article to hear everyone's response. I'm not going to take a side right away because I want to get some good debates going and hear what you all have to say.

    Obama Treason Charges Advance In Tennessee Grand Jury
    It's time for a revolution in our country. Not a revolution forged with guns and bombs but a revolution forged of compassion and altruism. A revolution that extends a hand to those who don't have and who cannot. A revolution that makes Health Care available to all those in the US.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by EpicDude86 View Post
    Calling a bunch of people bigots? wow. Way to not break from the Liberal Stereotype of using blanket terms to define people who don't agree with you.
    Wait, are you defending birthers?
    Not to challenge or insult but I ask... why?

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Epic Mountain
    Last Seen
    12-28-09 @ 06:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    Wait, are you defending birthers?
    Not to challenge or insult but I ask... why?
    It was kind of subtle irony, sarcastically in asking him if he were upholding the 'liberal stereotype' I successfully placed a blanket term over a group of people as well.

    Some birthers are just people who want some more answers because what they see doesn't seem right to them. they're not all foaming at the mouth. Though I guess I would be defending SOME birthers, yes.

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Western Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    12-30-09 @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,648

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by EnigmaO01 View Post
    Oh my Dear God in Heaven not this again. Do you believe the earth is flat and we never went to the moon?! For God's sake! This is so ludicrous the supreme court refused to waste their time on it. Get over it. McCain and Caribou Barbee lost. Obama's our president now!


    The earth is round, we've been to the moon & Congress nor the Supreme Court (or any other court) has ever clearly defined what the term Natural Born Citizen means.

    If you believe that the term Natural Born Citizen has been clearly defined, then I believe you are suspect to falling for just about anything...

  10. #30
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:12 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,331
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Filing charges of Treason against Obama?

    Quote Originally Posted by The silenced majority View Post
    The earth is round, we've been to the moon & Congress nor the Supreme Court (or any other court) has ever clearly defined what the term Natural Born Citizen means.

    If you believe that the term Natural Born Citizen has been clearly defined, then I believe you are suspect to falling for just about anything...
    But the Supreme Court did deny a suit by Philip Berg on Obama's qualifications...
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •