• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin's book goes rouge on some facts

Still no discussion of these "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on?

I'll check back in a week or so.
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on?

I'll check back in a week or so.
Click to expand...

There's not going to be any discussion of that. It's because they actually have the mindset that "Palin Sucks!!!" is a legitimate argument. It's been that way since day one with them.
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on?

I'll check back in a week or so.
Click to expand...

You have to be able to click a link. If you can do that, go to the original OP and read the article on which the post is based.
 
Last edited:
disneydude said:
You have to be able to click a link. If you can do that, go to the original OP and read the article on which the post is based.
Click to expand...

That article was thrashed. Would you like to defend the points of the article one by one with me and see where we end up?:2wave:
 
jallman said:
That article was thrashed. Would you like to defend the points of the article one by one with me and see where we end up?:2wave:
Click to expand...


I tried that MANY pages ago, In this thread I think, or another one related to the same exact topic that was never merged.

Either way, nobody ever responded to it defending the AP.

And my points were very elementary arguments at best.
 
Caine said:
I tried that MANY pages ago, In this thread I think, or another one related to the same exact topic that was never merged.

Either way, nobody ever responded to it defending the AP.

And my points were very elementary arguments at best.
Click to expand...

That's all it takes to run them off. Present a coherent argument and the only response you get from them is "derrrrrr".
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on?

I'll check back in a week or so.
Click to expand...

Sure there is, read the thread.
 
jallman said:
There's not going to be any discussion of that. It's because they actually have the mindset that "Palin Sucks!!!" is a legitimate argument. It's been that way since day one with them.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. Nobody ever said "Palin sucks" is an argument. It's just an opinion. Please don't play games.
 
disneydude said:
I think he's referring to the Bible. The New Testament or something....
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah, Jesus kind of wrote that with ghostwriters. Just like Palin!
 
Still no discussion of these facts..........

I thought for a second someone was going to address it....

Fat chance in that though...

Why do that when, "OMG OMG OMG PALIN SUCKS OMG OMG OMG!" works as perfects cliff notes to their arguments.
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these facts..........

I thought for a second someone was going to address it....

Fat chance in that though...

Why do that when, "OMG OMG OMG PALIN SUCKS OMG OMG OMG!" works as perfects cliff notes to their arguments.
Click to expand...

Again, yes, there was discussion. Read the thread.
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these facts..........
Click to expand...

You are exactly correct.. there was NO discussion of facts.. matter of fact there were no facts in the article to debate...
 
Caine said:
Still no discussion of these facts..........

I thought for a second someone was going to address it....

Fat chance in that though...

Why do that when, "OMG OMG OMG PALIN SUCKS OMG OMG OMG!" works as perfects cliff notes to their arguments.
Click to expand...

No one is going to address any legitimate discussion when it comes to Palin because the whole discourse has devolved to "Palin Sucks!!!" and issues are meaningless to these people.

Also, they know that when it comes to actual issues, Palin's record paints a very different story than this image they created of her being some prolife nazi from backwoods Alaska.
 
jallman said:
:roll::roll::roll:

Do you know what a hyperbole is?
Click to expand...

Yeah. And I have learned that most of the time, what you think is hyperbole around here isn't. Sorry if you were wildly exaggerating and I couldn't tell.
 
jallman said:
No one is going to address any legitimate discussion when it comes to Palin because the whole discourse has devolved to "Palin Sucks!!!" and issues are meaningless to these people.
Click to expand...

So is that hyperbole? Because it's not actually true.

I'm here. Bring up an issue about Palin. I promise not to say "Palin sucks" or "OMG," not even once.
 
misterman said:
Yeah. And I have learned that most of the time, what you think is hyperbole around here isn't. Sorry if you were wildly exaggerating and I couldn't tell.
Click to expand...

It's ok. It doesn't translate well in the written word.:2wave:
 
misterman said:
Again, yes, there was discussion. Read the thread.
Click to expand...


Just read the thread all over again.

There were 2 posts made that had anything to do with the "facts" listed in the OP article.

My post on the matter must have been on another thread related to this same topic that Im too lazy to dig around to find.

Regardless..... a one time back and forth between two posters is not considered a discussion on these "facts".
 
Caine said:
Just read the thread all over again.

There were 2 posts made that had anything to do with the "facts" listed in the OP article.
Click to expand...

Okay then.

My post on the matter must have been on another thread related to this same topic that Im too lazy to dig around to find.
Click to expand...

Then please be lazy enough not to bring it up again.

Regardless..... a one time back and forth between two posters is not considered a discussion on these "facts".
Click to expand...

It's not my fault a thread got derailed. Happens all the time.
 
Re: I

winston53660 said:
I'm waiting for her to become one of the gals living in the Playboy Mansion.
Click to expand...

Is anyone old enough to remember the Reverend Jim Baker scandal? Jessica Hahn said she was sweet and innocent before Baker took advantage of her. Funny thing was the next thing ya know she's posing naked in Playboy. :roll:

They'll have to do some airbrush work if Palin poses in Playboy.
 
misterman said:
Okay then.



Then please be lazy enough not to bring it up again.



It's not my fault a thread got derailed. Happens all the time.
Click to expand...

Since you joined the thread and continued derailing it rather than discuss the "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on....


Do you have any thoughts or comments on the actual topic at hand ?
 
Caine said:
Since you joined the thread and continued derailing it rather than discuss the "facts" that Palin went "rogue" on....


Do you have any thoughts or comments on the actual topic at hand ?
Click to expand...

Sure.

I think she went rogue on some of the facts.

Kind of like she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom