• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin's book goes rouge on some facts

Care to mention which "facts" from AP's article where she went rogue?

I have to read the article for you and highlight them?

I'll do one for you:

"She criticizes President Barack Obama for pushing through a bailout package that actually was achieved by his Republican predecessor George W. Bush — a package she seemed to support at the time."

You can read, go click on it and see the rest yourself. There's a list of her claims and the facts behind them. Alot have some wiggle room, but it's not hard to tell she was leaving out details knowing the average Palin-lover won't question them because they aren't very swift.
 
Palin has always had little more than a passing acquaintance with facts, she's nothing if not consistent.
 
I have to read the article for you and highlight them?

I'll do one for you:

"She criticizes President Barack Obama for pushing through a bailout package that actually was achieved by his Republican predecessor George W. Bush — a package she seemed to support at the time."

You can read, go click on it and see the rest yourself. There's a list of her claims and the facts behind them. Alot have some wiggle room, but it's not hard to tell she was leaving out details knowing the average Palin-lover won't question them because they aren't very swift.


Alot have plenty of wiggle room.

The AP throws hearsay from others out there as facts while stating that Palin's own "hearsay" should be considered going "rogue" on the "facts".

The one you picked out specifically looks like some of the partisan hack comments made on here by Obama supporters.

Its obvious that the AP "fact checkers" had an agenda.
 
The AP throws hearsay from others out there as facts

Examples?

The one you picked out specifically looks like some of the partisan hack comments made on here by Obama supporters.

Which? Are they not true?

She certainly lied about the bridge to nowhere.

She criticized Obama for the bailout that she appeared to support when Bush was pushing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom