• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bush attempting to rewrite history of "disastrous presidency"

Hrrm methinks it prolly wasnt true, berets and cia agents train our spies and paramilitaries overseas and on site usually. That would be weird though, meet him at the 7-11.

Alot of people would be all lyke: "OMG if i saw Osama I would kill him."

If he encountered me he would just have alot of explaining to do :rofl itd be too damned interesting to want to kill him. But thats because I'm a liberal.

Well it was supposedly during the fighting of the Soviets in Afghanistan that they brought some of them over here to train, or some such nonsense. It made sense at the time, and one guy said he had met him under an alias but everyone knew who he was. Of course at that point it was more almost 8+ years before the initial car bombing of the WTC (though I don't know if Osama was involved directly with that or not, I know it was the same characters)
 
If you weren't brainwashed, you would advocate that he put out his side of the story,

Yes, by him and his administration being thoroughly interviewed and interrogated under oath by all sides, supporters, opponents, whoever.
 
"Unlike Hitler, Bush gets to rewrite the history of his leadership, to hide the bad parts and enhance/create the good parts. Astonishing."

Very neutral.

I never tried hiding the fact that I really have dislike for George W Bush and his administration. He was a horrible president, and thats the neutral stand.
 
I never tried hiding the fact that I really have dislike for George W Bush and his administration. He was a horrible president, and thats the neutral stand.

You are so full of **** MZ. You know you love Bush. He's a great American cowboy, like John Wayne or Clint Eastwood.
 
You are so full of **** MZ. You know you love Bush. He's a great American cowboy, like John Wayne or Clint Eastwood.

OH NO YOU DID NOT COMPARE BUSH TO THE DUKE!!!!

NO HE DI-INT!!

Seriously, comparing John Wayne and George Bush is like comparing the maniliness of Richard Simmons to that of George Washington.

It's not a valid comparison.

Bush is an imbecile from Texas. John Wayne is a true American ICON!
 
OH NO YOU DID NOT COMPARE BUSH TO THE DUKE!!!!

NO HE DI-INT!!

Seriously, comparing John Wayne and George Bush is like comparing the maniliness of Richard Simmons to that of George Washington.

It's not a valid comparison.

Bush is an imbecile from Texas. John Wayne is a true American ICON!

I most certainly did. They share that quality of character that causes them to make decisions and see it through. No hesitation. I like to think of it as the Duke inspiring Bush.

Bush had some bad policies, but Bush was a great man.
 
I still say it's an odd comparison lol.

John wasn't Mr. Compassionate Conservative.:mrgreen:
 
I still say it's an odd comparison lol.

John wasn't Mr. Compassionate Conservative.:mrgreen:

Well, I was talking about major character traits. These things always break down under close examination as everyone is different and has had different influences.

Also, I was saying that George Bush was like John Wayne, not that John Wayne was like George Bush. John Wayne grew up in a different era than George Bush. John Wayne was of an age more like Bush's father.
 
I see you have your conspiracy baseball cap on again.

I was able to read it.
 
It works here. Perhaps it doesnt work in the US.. :thinking

That is ok. We do not need backwards propaganda here.

If people want to subject themselves to your rantings, that is fine; however, I see no reason to do so.
 
That is ok. We do not need backwards propaganda here.

If people want to subject themselves to your rantings, that is fine; however, I see no reason to do so.

It is always useful to see backwards propaganda, as oppose to just "right" propaganda.
 
It is always useful to see backwards propaganda, as oppose to just "right" propaganda.

You do nothing but spew anti-American rhetoric. It's difficult to take anything you post seriously.
 
You do nothing but spew anti-American rhetoric. It's difficult to take anything you post seriously.

Perhaps you should start looking into opinions that differ from your own. I believe it could be healthy and serve you well.
 
Lord knows you should follow that advice.
 
To convince the rest of us about the error of our ways. Your signature is really accurate.
 
To convince the rest of us about the error of our ways. Your signature is really accurate.

I am here to spread a different perspective than the same **** you have served every day by your government and media. I am also here to see what you peoples opinions are.

And several other things.
 
I am here to spread a different perspective than the same **** you have served every day by your government and media. I am also here to see what you peoples opinions are.

And several other things.

News Flash:
1) You're just as reliable as the next person on this forum,
b) it's the internet, lighten up,
3) just because you think you're smart, or clever, or found out some sort of conspiracy plan doesn't mean it's true.
&) The way you talk down to other people and about other people makes you come off as a dick. Just saying. Your opinion is just that, an opinion.


Take your **** to the conspiracy forums and leave it there.
 
News Flash:
1) You're just as reliable as the next person on this forum,
b) it's the internet, lighten up,
3) just because you think you're smart, or clever, or found out some sort of conspiracy plan doesn't mean it's true.
&) The way you talk down to other people and about other people makes you come off as a dick. Just saying. Your opinion is just that, an opinion.


Take your **** to the conspiracy forums and leave it there.

1. I am not trying to be less or more credible than anything. As I said, people need to see the other side, I provide it.
b. Yes.
3. I never believe anything, not conspiracies, nor facts, I only partly accept popular belief and the most logic reality in cooperation.
&. I am not Mr. Nice guy. Actually I am in real life, very nice, almost to nice and modest. And yes it is, just like all other opinions.

PS.. I do believe a lot of people misunderstand me, and what I am trying to say, and what I am saying.
 
1. I am not trying to be less or more credible than anything. As I said, people need to see the other side, I provide it.
b. Yes.
3. I never believe anything, not conspiracies, nor facts, I only partly accept popular belief and the most logic reality in cooperation.
&. I am not Mr. Nice guy. Actually I am in real life, very nice, almost to nice and modest. And yes it is, just like all other opinions.

PS.. I do believe a lot of people misunderstand me, and what I am trying to say, and what I am saying.

I must admit, I am confused, you do not "believe facts"?:confused:
 
I must admit, I am confused, you do not "believe facts"?:confused:

Facts are unreliable. The thing I do know about facts, is that over time they change.

All facts are based on theories, that are based on other theories. And facts as such, is the strongest most accepted theories. If one of the theories that the theories of the theories are built on is flawed, the whole reasoning behind the last theory/fact becomes much weakened. The problem humanity has is our adaption of too many "certain" facts.

I do believe in different credibility of theories. And some things I assume as almost certainty.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom