• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

An Officer & a Gentleman

Agree'd. The Mongols weren't really motivated, they did it for teh lulz.

They, now that we're on the subject, were actually tolerant to other religions. Which surprises me.. becuase that means they didn't kill everyone. As long as you considered them your ruler, then you had some of the best protection.. There are fables/myths that disorderly conduct was treated with such hostility that a woman could walk throughout the Mongolian Empire without fear of being molested.
 
They, now that we're on the subject, were actually tolerant to other religions. Which surprises me.. becuase that means they didn't kill everyone. As long as you considered them your ruler, then you had some of the best protection.. There are fables/myths that disorderly conduct was treated with such hostility that a woman could walk throughout the Mongolian Empire without fear of being molested.

And Mongolian Barbecue is the ****.
 
Again you are putting your own words to what I said.... I have no idea, nor have I made any statements about what this (the shooter) said.

I did however say that we should take as instructive what is being said by the Muslims quoted in the OP.



Now take your attempt at a strawman and go away.

So we should care what these muslims say, why?
 
we should take as instructive what is being said

we should take as instructive what is being said

we should take as instructive what is being said

take as instructive what is being said

as instructive
 
we should take as instructive what is being said

we should take as instructive what is being said

take as instructive what is being said

as instructive

Let me emphasize that we should take as instructive what is being said :2wave:
 
Before you talk abt Human Rights put you own house in order first. You Killed more innocent people than Saddam Hussein. And your constitutional gun culture has been paying the price for many years.

Catz killed more Iraqis than Saddam?! Well I bet Saddam killed more Kurds than Catz....


Our Constitution would beat the **** out of your Constitution any day of the year.
 
Whenever we get hit there's always some jackass to pop up out of the woodwork to tell us we deserved it. It's nothing new or special.
Usually from the left.

ward-churchill.jpg
 
It's a comin' from the left...
30_wright_lg.jpg


and it's a comin' from the right...
pat_robertson.jpg



:O
 
Do you think his religion was a factor, or do you think it was mainly that he was nuts?
 
I think he was nuts and the circumstance of him being Muslim and counseling Iraq vets traumatized by the war was a factor in making him go crazy.
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrtoLSlOUAo"]YouTube- Ward Churchill Explains "Little Eichmans"[/ame]
 
I am not a muslim but you guys out there have to shed the white superiority image and stop playing Uncle Sam to the rest of the world if you wanna be at peace with the muslims and others. You invaded and occupying two countries and killed much more innocent people

We don't have to be at peace with the Muslims. They have to be at peace with us, or we'll just kill'em all.

Newsflash: we hadn't invaded any Muslims country when the Muslims started murdering our people 30 years ago.

Git with the program, please?
 
We don't have to be at peace with the Muslims. They have to be at peace with us, or we'll just kill'em all.

Newsflash: we hadn't invaded any Muslims country when the Muslims started murdering our people 30 years ago.

Git with the program, please?

Maybe they're just mad because the Jews stole aaaallll their land.

5734_531657088306_53502627_31508644_7947377_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
We don't have to be at peace with the Muslims. They have to be at peace with us, or we'll just kill'em all.

Newsflash: we hadn't invaded any Muslims country when the Muslims started murdering our people 30 years ago.

Git with the program, please?

We were just passing through Egypt in WWII, right?
 
We were just passing through Egypt in WWII, right?

I'm almost sure that it was technically a "fascist" country when we got there. Plus the Muslims 'teamed up' (and I use that term lightly) with the Axis guys during WWII so they had that **** coming to them anyways.


and yes, we were just passing through LOL.
 
We were just passing through Egypt in WWII, right?

Oh, yeah! The Egyptians were welcoming the Nazis with open arms. You got it, babe! NOT!!!! Read a few history books when you get a chance.

And, yes, there was a Muslim contengent in the Nazi army.
 
Oh, yeah! The Egyptians were welcoming the Nazis with open arms. You got it, babe! NOT!!!! Read a few history books when you get a chance.

And, yes, there was a Muslim contengent in the Nazi army.

There was no "Nazi" army, there were SS Divisions and Nazi Officers but it was the German Wehrmacht. Just making sure we use proper terminology, Don't want anyone tearing your side part because of improperly labeling something.
 
Oh, yeah! The Egyptians were welcoming the Nazis with open arms. You got it, babe! NOT!!!! Read a few history books when you get a chance.

And, yes, there was a Muslim contengent in the Nazi army.

Bold Underline: I'm frightened.

How about 1815 Tripoli?

Is that good?

or 1838 Indonesia?


Which do you prefer?
 
Back
Top Bottom