This Florida law is 100% irrelevant when it is direct contridiction the US Constitution
Actually, yes they do. The First Amendment is about allowing you to say anything you want as long as you don't slander, sexually harrass, or put anyone in a clear or present danger. As long as you aren't violating the rights of others, you can say anything, because a first Amendment would be meaningless if the government could arbitrarilly determine where the line is. Now I've never watched Max's work, nor do I want to. However, you, I and anyone else who doesn't want to watch this filth don't have to. Your religion argument is meaningless. You are allowed to practice your religion, but you cannot use force your religious values on others. It's explicitly stated that you can't in the constitution.
Yeah, let's get all the freaks and pervs in prison. Anyone with differant views, that Korymir finds offensive, should be thrown in jail
I think his crap is filth. However, I don't have to watch it, and neither do you. If people are underaged or forced into this stuff, then yes, the law should go after them. However, you've failed to show that the person convicted or directed "2 Girls 1 Cup" forced anyone or used anyone underaged in their shoot.
Why should they be enforced. As long as they aren't being forced on anyone, like a flasher, why is it any of the government's business to interfere in a consentual relationship between the film creators, adult actors, and viewing audience. What gives you the right to force your values on others.
Hopefully the he'll be realeased because his only crime was to exercise his rights in way that YOU and A FEW OTHERS disagree with
If there were some cultural message or moral lesson, that may be different, but here the purpose is simply to get your rocks off. Context is everything. IMO these things contribute to desensitizing and over-sexualizing the public, which in turn leads to abuse, divorce, rape, etc.
Abusing the right to free speech is the surest way to loose it. This guy is no Martian Luther King Jr so spare me you hyper-emotional "but the first amendment" bull ****.
Last edited by Jerry; 10-31-09 at 11:46 AM.
As for Hypro-emotion over the 1st Adm. your ****ing right I do and so should you and anyone else it's is the foundation of the United States of America and the most basic rights of us Humans.
So who gets to decide what is appropriate and what is not? How are we supposed to know beforehand?
BTW I always found his work to be pretty funny. They're just so cheesy and over the top.
EDIT: And of course this could set a precedent whereby porn itself is banned. Sex on videotape?! That isn't decent!
"I do not claim that every incident in the history of empire can be explained in directly economic terms. Economic interests are filtered through a political process, policies are implemented by a complex state apparatus, and the whole system generates its own momentum."
What you might call endecent other will say it's not I find all forms of religion Endecenent so shall we close all Churchs and burn them to the ground.