You are clearly of the mind that a President should defer to his military leaders' advice/suggestions/recommendations and follow those recommendations without hesitation. This is not only foolish, but incredibly ignorant.
Beyond this, you stated:
I DID prove that the president (Bush) failed "to give the proper support to soldiers on the battlefield, without damn good reason." Ergo, using your logic, Bush should have been impeached.If the president fails to give the proper support to soldiers on the battlefield, without damn good reason, it could be considered a dereliction of duty. Unless, you can prove otherwise. Can you? Dereliction of duty is an impeachable offense.
Game. Set. Match.
Now, I have a question for all you folks who are gung-ho about sending even more troops into Afghanistan.
Pray tell, where are these people going to come from?
We've already lowered our recruitment standards and have been accepting people who do not meet the minimum requirements for service. In addition:
US, UK Public Support for Afghan War Declines
Soooo, unless you folks are advocating that we initiate a draft....
Does that answer your question as to where the people are going to come from?· Army – 3,995 accessions with a goal of 3,900; 102 percent
· Navy – 2,719 accessions with a goal of 2,719; 100 percent
· Marine Corps – 1,666 accessions with a goal of 1,018; 164 percent
· Air Force – 2,162 accessions with a goal of 2,157; 100 percent
DefenseLink News Release: DoD Announces Recruiting and Retention Numbers for April 2009