Don't Tase Me Bro
Active member
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 446
- Reaction score
- 195
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
1) It costs a higher percentage probably because it covers a higher percentage of people. To me, other people's lives are more important than pocket change.
Nobody is stopping you from donating your pocket change, but like most hypocrites you're a big champion of your cause as long as someone else foots the bill.
There would be a lot of savings if US went single payer. I don't know how much,
Then how do you know there would be?
but it has a lot of advantages such as easy access to patient's records from anywhere (instead of calling and requesting a copy of paper records) and allowing more people to work with smaller recovery periods.
How do you know this?
Also, Medicare on steroids? Wouldn't that be an even higher satisfaction percentage than what we have now?
Medicare has been in the red for years and is insolvent. It's the third highest expenditure of the Federal government and is going bankrupt. Remember, we have an $11 trillion debt to pay back and that isn't including the $9 trillion that the Dalai Bama wants to add on over the next ten years.