The doctor has been quite a bit lacking around Gladney. All you have is a guy suddenly in a wheelchair who a day before was perfectly fine to talk. I'll remember next time I trip and fall to threaten to sue everyone around me
The doctor seems to be lacking around Gladney? Okay, you are just reaching now. I am not going to fault the guy for not taking cameras with him to his doctor appointments.
As it stands now there is no alleged hate crime only Gladney claiming such. You'd need more proof of that. That's if this even will get to a court. So without the video you have a case of he said she said.
No, without the video you have a case of an alleged hated crime being witnessed or not by a crowd of people.
You have to prove he was specifically targeted because of his race. Once again this is where the hate crime argument fails to meet the criteria. He was called the N-word by a black guy. It is unclear who initiated the confrontation but we do know a black SIEU member was on the ground and Gladney was standing over him. We do know that someone got in Gladney's way and that Gladney fell over. We do not know for sure what happened before or after but according to the current evidence there is nothing to denote a hate crime. Hate crimes in MO cover race, religion, ethnicity and orientation. They do not cover political groups. Again in order for it to be a hate crime you have to show he was specifically targeted for being black.
Well he was being called the N-word. :shrug: I am sure the courts will decide; not you or me.
I haven't heard a peep out of anyone who has examined him.
And you probably won't before a hearing occurs. He has a right to medical privacy and his doctor has an obligation to maintain that right. Get over it.
I see a guy sitting in a wheelchair with no physical evidence of a beating taken place. His face was fine, his arms and legs were fine. He described that he was kicked while on the ground. There doesn't seem to be any outward appearance of that. Well you don't know what his situation is either but you're still propping him up.
Bull****. I haven't propped anyone up. I have stated that your accusations are baseless and unfounded because...now let me check...yep, you still have zero credentials to make the determination that he is "fine" (wonder how one arrives at a medical diagnosis of "fine" :lol
He was all over fox news on the 7th giving interviews perfectly fine no wheelchair, no painkillers. He claims he was kicked and punched in the head. For someone hit like that his head looks fine. Unless those big bad mean union workers hit like girls. Yet he comes out at a press conference with a wheelchair and supposedly too drugged up on pain killers to talk.
And until you have a medical report that supports your uninformed conjecture, your "diagnosis" of "fine" means as much to this debate as the dust on my shoe.
Really now? Both after their own 15 minutes of fame blowing up their own situation bigger than it was. Joe criticized Obama even though Joe wasn't going to be taxed under the plan and his business didn't make enough to be taxed. Gladney opposed to reform while at the same time asking for donations for "medical" bills. Seems pretty similiar.
I suppose if you so desperately need the comparison, you can make anything fit. I find your comparison stretching at best but closer to irrelevant.
Why am I not moaning and bitching about the union guy? The union guy isn't milking this for 15 minutes of fame. He's not playing the victim here. Even though Gladney stood over him.
Gladney stood over him? Or Gladney was standing there when the guy fell? You're soooo quick to condemn Gladney with little information (oh, oh...except a laymen's diagnosis of "fine". still can't get over that. :lol
. But at the same time, with just as little information, so quick to absolve the union guy. I find the hypocrisy quite amusing. But not surprising.
Right now its not even a given that anyone was attacked. You have a union guy on the ground and you have gladney falling over when a union guy came between Gladney and his friend.
In your perception, skewed as it is.
You don't seem to either. As of yet we don't see much proof of anything.
Exactly. So then why so quick to condemn a man when you confess that you don't know jack **** about the situation?