Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

  1. #21
    Professor
    WillRockwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    07-10-10 @ 09:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,950

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Another Freeper thread, a ditto-head group hug. Mods, is this really how you want this forum to look?

  2. #22
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:43 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,562

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by WillRockwell View Post
    Another Freeper thread, a ditto-head group hug. Mods, is this really how you want this forum to look?
    A place where all viewpoints may be discussed? I'll bet they do!
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  3. #23
    Guru
    Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Seen
    12-21-10 @ 05:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,063

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by WillRockwell View Post
    Another Freeper thread, a ditto-head group hug. Mods, is this really how you want this forum to look?
    Are you that afraid something might be said against Obama? Delicate little thing isn't he.

  4. #24
    Voluntary Resignation

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    11-30-10 @ 05:20 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,059

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by WillRockwell View Post
    Another Freeper thread, a ditto-head group hug. Mods, is this really how you want this forum to look?
    Which of us are Freepers?

  5. #25
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,144

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Nothing in the thread breaks rules, the title matches the article. The fact that Celticlord completely misrepresents what the article says is amusing, but not against the rules.
    You sound surprised.
    <font size=5><b>Its been several weeks since the Vegas shooting.  Its it still "Too Early" or can we start having the conversation about finally doing something about these mass shootings???​</b></font>

  6. #26
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:51 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,321
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    A place where all viewpoints may be discussed? I'll bet they do!
    Not that I think that there is anything actually wrong with the thread, or that it should be deleted or anything, but it's not really a "viewpoint", it's a dishonest attempt to smear democrats for something that they had no control over. The premise was that democrats where "running and hiding" from town hall meetings due to protests, except that it was not democrats that canceled the event, it was the host school.

  7. #27
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:43 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,562

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Not that I think that there is anything actually wrong with the thread, or that it should be deleted or anything, but it's not really a "viewpoint", it's a dishonest attempt to smear democrats for something that they had no control over. The premise was that democrats where "running and hiding" from town hall meetings due to protests, except that it was not democrats that canceled the event, it was the host school.
    Not really the point I was making. It was about WillRockwell's apparent desire for censorship.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  8. #28
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,974

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Moderator's Warning:
    Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills eventIf you have issues with a thread and where it stands, report it. The middle of a thread is not the proper place for questioning what "mods" want the forum to look like

  9. #29
    Professor
    WillRockwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    07-10-10 @ 09:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,950

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    A place where all viewpoints may be discussed? I'll bet they do!
    I don't see "all viewpoints being discussed" in any threads. I see partisan thugs slapping each other on the back and attacking anyone who differs. It's the same tactic the right uses on the national stage, shout, lie, and intimidate until the opposition disappears.

  10. #30
    Walk with me in hell.
    stekim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Last Seen
    09-21-10 @ 12:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,106

    Re: Citing safety concerns, U. City cancels McCaskills event

    Quote Originally Posted by celticlord View Post
    You forget, I'm part of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. I can't read any memo without using that secret decoder ring from the Cracker Jack box....and Walgreens was all out of Cracker Jacks!

    At least, that's what the lunatic left would have you believe. Or perhaps I'm just a guy who reads the papers, thinks a bit, and actually demands that Congress hew to its mandate of representing the will of the people, rather than the will of Dear Leader's Chosen Few.
    According to the studies posted on this thread the "will of the people" is for a public option. I'm NOT saying I support it, but that's the issue with the tyranny of the majority. So, if the "people" want it, will you support it?
    Wow. Am I awesome or what?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •