2nd, if you condone rationing of care, how is that better quality care, which is also a staple of the government run health system.
Perhaps you didnt watch the video? They sent her a letter telling her instead of paying for chemotherapy, they would most certainly pay for physician assisted death. I dont know how more blunt they have to be for you to understand that.The state is not killing this woman, they're simply not paying for chemotherapy. She's free to pay for it herself.
Exactly, which makes the entire arguement FOR UHC ridiculous b/c the government cannot match funds with the amount of care needed, if they are gonna proclaim healthcare is a right.Requiring that the state pay for chemotherapy even where it's not cost-effective simply because this person wants it is a one-way ticket to bankruptcy.
Just turn to Medicare and Medicaid as examples. Those stellar programs are running in the black arent they?