Lets reread it then...you wrote.
And that sir, is a disgusting view pure and simple.. it is not freedom... it is murder. No one should get a pass for using religion as a reason for murder.. we dont give Islamic extremists a pass, so why should we give Christian extremists a pass?
Then you come with this gem of a comment.
Here you change attitude, but are not brave enough to go all the way. You basically say that it was wrong but cant get away from the religious freedom aspect as you pad your comments. You do not say it was murder nor do you say directly it was wrong.. you use "politician speak" like "over the line" and "tantamount".. it is double speak and avoiding the truth.. it was murder! .. over the line. gezz that is a comment you use against someone using profanity against someone or someone going a bit nuts and pushing someone in an argument.. that is over the line.. letting someone die or being directly involved in their death is not over the line, it is wrong on so many fronts and highly illegal.. it is murder.Though this is tatamount IMO to yelling "fire" in a theatre and over the line.
And then you are back to defending the religious zealots that willingly and knowingly let a child die.And the op's religious bigorty is noted.
Let me guess though, if a Muslim say murdered his child over honour then it was bad right and you would be all over it? And yes it is exactly the same thing. No where in the bible does it say that sick people should only be healed by the power of prayer, just as no where in the Koran does it say it is okay to kill a person over honour.
Matthew 10:34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.