• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump: I may not repeal Obamacare

He's actually said he would support these two provisions before so this should be news to no one.

ObamaCare's disintegrating before our eyes so I think even Hillary would have been forced to gut it.

Good riddance and finally this monkey is off the backs of the Democrats back


LOL.....the only thing that he is going to get rid of is the Republican idea of the Insurance mandate. He'll have to replace it with something......maybe we'll get the public option that was a better plan to begin with.
 
LOL.....the only thing that he is going to get rid of is the Republican idea of the Insurance mandate. He'll have to replace it with something......maybe we'll get the public option that was a better plan to begin with.

Yes, ObamaCare is the GOPs fault.....:roll: Hillary should have brought that up before Tuesday, she might have been able to hold onto Michigan at least.

For some reason she didn't
 

The most misleading title of a tread I have ever seen. The policies of "cant be turned down for preexisting conditions" and "stay on parents insurance to age 26" have nothing to with the substance of the Obamacare law. They are just propaganda talking points added to make this terrible law semi palatable.

Trump keeping them doesn't mean he is keeping Obamacare.

Knock it off, this type pf BS is why your side lost the election.
 
Yes, ObamaCare is the GOPs fault.....:roll: Hillary should have brought that up before Tuesday, she might have been able to hold onto Michigan at least.

For some reason she didn't

What do you get out of lying? Obamacare did not get a single GOP vote.
 
The policies of "cant be turned down for preexisting conditions" and "stay on parents insurance to age 26" have nothing to with the substance of the Obamacare law.

That's the core of the insurance reforms. Everything follows from that.
 
Yes, ObamaCare is the GOPs fault.....:roll: Hillary should have brought that up before Tuesday, she might have been able to hold onto Michigan at least.

For some reason she didn't

Nice attempt at spin and deflection. Never said that "Obamacare is the GOP's fault"....but make no doubt about it....the insurance mandate ABSOLUTELY was a Republican idea that was offered to appease the REpublicans and the blue dogs. Do your homework.
 
Yes they do. Democrats chose to pass it via Reconciliation, Republicans can get rid of it via Reconciliation.
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

The ACA passed with 60 votes in the Senate. There were some amendments passed by reconciliation. I'm not enough of a Senate rules expert to know what the Senate can and can't pass with reconciliation, but it's not at all clear that the ACA can be repealed with 50 votes plus Pence. From what I understand funding can be stripped that way, because as I understand it it's budget matters that can be passed only with a majority.
 
El Wrongo, O medical insurance breath. The GOP has the votes in both the House and Senate to repeal Obamacare. In the Senate, it will be introduced as a reconciliation bill, and that will avoid the filibuster. Trump will sign it too.

Obamacare is going bye bye.

I think you are wrong about using reconciliation to repeal the entire bill. I think all that can be done through reconciliation is gutting the bill and stripping it of its funding.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/upshot/the-future-of-obamacare-looks-bleak.html
 
headline says one thing, article says another.


"Either Obamacare will be amended, or repealed and replaced," Trump told the newspaper. "I told him I will look at his suggestions, and out of respect, I will do that." -trump

Problem is that Republicans don't have a replacement, except for one we have never seen, which they say is YUUGELY GOOD.
 
Problem is that Republicans don't have a replacement, except for one we have never seen, which they say is YUUGELY GOOD.
.... so, how long has it been since you checked the accuracy of that talking point?

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
.... so, how long has it been since you checked the accuracy of that talking point?

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

I can hear the gears in some peoples heads... Wondering... What is fact checking???
 
.... so, how long has it been since you checked the accuracy of that talking point?

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

If that is just a talking point, then perhaps you have a link to the actual plan?
 
That's the core of the insurance reforms. Everything follows from that.

Nice try. Obamacare is as dead as Dog S**t and Obama is going down in history next to Carter as a failed President. Trumps is not even keeping the entire pre-existing condition part, it's just for people who had insurance and were forced to switch insurance companies.
 
If that is just a talking point, then perhaps you have a link to the actual plan?

It has been a failed talking point for years. Democrats and MSM outlets (but, I repeat myself) simply keep repeating the mantra that they-have-no-plan, indicating either A) they don't bother do do basic research or B) they are deliberately dishonest.

Generally, folks on here are a blend of both, with folks starting with A and then shifting to B via a goal-post move, eventually reaching okay-but-they-haven't-gotten-a-plan-that-passed-both-chambers-and-was-scored-by-the-CBO-and-then-gone-on-to-the-Presidents'-Desk. :roll:


The House has done some excellent work just this year as part of its Better Way.
 
It has been a failed talking point for years. Democrats and MSM outlets (but, I repeat myself) simply keep repeating the mantra that they-have-no-plan, indicating either A) they don't bother do do basic research or B) they are deliberately dishonest.

It's neither, actually. A small group coming up with an outline of a plan, without much in the way of details, and not scored, or the costs estimated, and all the downsides just brushed away or entirely ignored, and that probably can't get a majority of the republicans in the House much less pass, is just an outline of something.

At worst, we have a different definition of what a "plan" is for this purpose. For the first time in January, the GOP will have to put their money where their mouths are and actually produce something. That's the first time we'll see an actual "plan" that means ANYTHING.

You (like the rest of us) don't have any idea what kind of "replace" "plan" will be on the table in January, which is our point.
 
Back
Top Bottom