• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DC Attorney: FBI Never Destroyed Laptops Of Clinton Aides

zimmer

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Agents within the Federal Bureau of Investigation never destroyed laptops given to them by aides of Hillary Clinton as previously reported, a Washington D.C. lawyer with a source close to the Clinton investigation says.

“According to the agreement reached with the attorneys who handed over their laptops, the laptops were to be destroyed per the agreement after the testimony was given –the interviews were given – – by the attorneys. The bureau and the department agreed to that,” DiGenova said. “However the laptops contrary to published reports were not destroyed and the reason is the agents who are tasked with destroying them refused to do so. And by the way the laptops are at the FBI for inspection by Congress or federal courts.”

DiGenova said the laptops have already been subpoenaed and the FBI is waiting for Congress to ask for them.

Read more: DC Attorney: FBI Never Destroyed Laptops Of Clinton Aides | The Daily Caller
Click to expand...

Not good news for the Clinton Crime Machine.
 
zimmer said:
Not good news for the Clinton Crime Machine.
Click to expand...

I'm curious how the FBI maintains a right to abrogate their agreement, or perhaps the review by Congress is testimony . Suggesting that the FBI might treat the agreement more open than the original owners of the laptops. The argument that some of the missing 33,000 emails might turn up on some of these laptops is interesting. Do you think the Clinton machine "feels sumpin' slippin?"
 
DaveFagan said:
I'm curious how the FBI maintains a right to abrogate their agreement, or perhaps the review by Congress is testimony . Suggesting that the FBI might treat the agreement more open than the original owners of the laptops. The argument that some of the missing 33,000 emails might turn up on some of these laptops is interesting. Do you think the Clinton machine "feels sumpin' slippin?"
Click to expand...
Other than life as they know it?:lol:
 
zimmer said:
Not good news for the Clinton Crime Machine.
Click to expand...

This is stunning. It makes sense thinking about it, though. If any of these people lied, all bets are off. Why would the FBI be in any hurry to destroy evidence?

And the plot thickens.
 
DaveFagan said:
I'm curious how the FBI maintains a right to abrogate their agreement, or perhaps the review by Congress is testimony . Suggesting that the FBI might treat the agreement more open than the original owners of the laptops. The argument that some of the missing 33,000 emails might turn up on some of these laptops is interesting. Do you think the Clinton machine "feels sumpin' slippin?"
Click to expand...

I'm thinking they had no intention of destroying these computers any time soon after testimony. Of course having them and accessing them are two very different things. Because the deals are off the table if anyone lied, they'd want to be absolutely certain no one did. There'd be hell to pay if they testified, the computers had been destroyed, and then it was found out that one or all had lied. 'Course Comeys going to pay anyway...
 
zimmer said:
Not good news for the Clinton Crime Machine.
Click to expand...

Looks like the whole thing is coming unraveled for the Clinton Crime Family (except Chelsea). These issues seem to just keep piling up. It takes a lot of dirt to bury all this poo and it looks like they ain't got a shovel big enough.
 
MaggieD said:
If any of these people lied, all bets are off. Why would the FBI be in any hurry to destroy evidence?

And the plot thickens.
Click to expand...

Bingo!

What's the likelihood someone in The Clinton Crime Machine lied?
 
NonoBadDog said:
Looks like the whole thing is coming unraveled for the Clinton Crime Family (except Chelsea). These issues seem to just keep piling up. It takes a lot of dirt to bury all this poo and it looks like they ain't got a shovel big enough.
Click to expand...

Chelsea's genius irritated Doug Band, claiming he wasn't doing enough for her father, and he in return illustrated the mountain of pay-for-play cash he generated for The Clinton Crime Machine.

Well done Chelsea.
 
zimmer said:
Chelsea's genius irritated Doug Band, claiming he wasn't doing enough for her father, and he in return illustrated the mountain of pay-for-play cash he generated for The Clinton Crime Machine.

Well done Chelsea.
Click to expand...

She seems to be the only one that is concerned with ethics and those pesky campaign laws.
 
DaveFagan said:
I'm curious how the FBI maintains a right to abrogate their agreement, or perhaps the review by Congress is testimony . Suggesting that the FBI might treat the agreement more open than the original owners of the laptops. The argument that some of the missing 33,000 emails might turn up on some of these laptops is interesting. Do you think the Clinton machine "feels sumpin' slippin?"
Click to expand...

It's an unethical agreement.
 
Hadn't the contents of the laptops already been examined? Why does it matter if they have been destroyed or not?
 
BrewerBob said:
Hadn't the contents of the laptops already been examined? Why does it matter if they have been destroyed or not?
Click to expand...

The DoJ made a deal (when they could have just taken the evidence) that the evidence would only be looked at in the context of the classified information investigation, denied to the corruption investigation, and then destroyed so that no one could go back.

It's hard to match up to Holder when it comes to abusing the post, but damn if Lynch didn't do her best.
 
BrewerBob said:
Hadn't the contents of the laptops already been examined? Why does it matter if they have been destroyed or not?
Click to expand...

I believe their computers were not examined.

When someone in the Clinton Machine sings, it's going to be interesting. There has been so much Clinton Crime Machine criminality, not everyone is going to eager to pull a Susan McDougal.

Then again, they may not need singers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom