• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WikiLeaks Claims Sham U.S. Firm is Trying to Smear Assange

Thoreau72 said:
He did not commit any crime, and the first Swedish prosecutor assigned to the case came to EXACTLY that conclusion and dismissed the case.

Only dirty political pressure from the US caused other Swedish authorities to bring the charges back.

But I know you are not interested in the truth.
Click to expand...

:roll:

T-72, if you told me water was wet, I'd run tests to make you. You have exactly zero credibility.

Have you figured out how the magical no radiation nukes got into the Twin Towers yet? :roll:
 
Tigerace117 said:
Pointing out that a source has a certain inherent bias is not propaganda.

Especially given that Assange seems to think that the law is for the little people-- the same thing that his supporters have accused politicians of thinking.
Click to expand...

One difference between Assange and our politicians...he admits what he does, they don't.
 
Mycroft said:
One difference between Assange and our politicians...he admits what he does, they don't.
Click to expand...

So he's admitted what he did was wrong and he's coming out of the embassy to answer the questions?
 
Tigerace117 said:
:roll:

T-72, if you told me water was wet, I'd run tests to make you. You have exactly zero credibility.

Have you figured out how the magical no radiation nukes got into the Twin Towers yet? :roll:
Click to expand...

As I told Maus, I never claimed there were no-radiation nukes at WTC. You dishonest posters keep insisting I did because the truth threatens your stories.

From the beginning, I pointed out that the many cancers present in the workers there confirm that radiation was very much present, and that a nuclear event(s) were the only explanations for it. From the beginning I have pointed out the reasoning for the Zadroga Bill, but you guys would rather attribute false statements to me.

I love your tactics, because they reveal just how desperate you are to keep the truth suppressed. :mrgreen:
 
Thoreau72 said:
As I told Maus, I never claimed there were no-radiation nukes at WTC. You dishonest posters keep insisting I did because the truth threatens your stories.

From the beginning, I pointed out that the many cancers present in the workers there confirm that radiation was very much present, and that a nuclear event(s) were the only explanations for it. From the beginning I have pointed out the reasoning for the Zadroga Bill, but you guys would rather attribute false statements to me.

I love your tactics, because they reveal just how desperate you are to keep the truth suppressed. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

No, a nuclear event is most definitely not the only possible explanation.

There's no way on earth the Twin Towers were nuked. Literally none.

Your theory is so ridiculous it's depressing. How somebody could go sailing that far into lala land and yet still be convinced that they are right.....
 
Tigerace117 said:
So he's admitted what he did was wrong and he's coming out of the embassy to answer the questions?
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are talking about, but it's not what I'm talking about.

He admits to releasing emails that have come into his possession.
 
Tigerace117 said:
And yet, despite your conviction(heh) that Clinton is practically Satan, she's still beating Trump by a fair margin. Imagine that. One of the worst democratic candidates in terms of like ability and yet---- your side had yet to find anything that can stop her.
Click to expand...

What a wonderfully ignorant post!!!! You didn't disappoint and thanks for that.

Nobody is beating anyone yet. Name one state where they are counting votes for each candidate. Not how many votes have been received by the state or precinct but votes for the candidates. I am pretty confident that you won't find one. You still haven't found any doctored documents from Wikileaks in response to this post.

NonoBadDog said:
I have a challenge for you. Find ONE document that Wikileaks has doctored and published. If your premise is correct it should be pretty easy since they have leaked more than 10 million documents of almost every government in the world.
Click to expand...


You are looking pretty lame here.
 
Last edited:
NonoBadDog said:
What a wonderfully ignorant post!!!! You didn't disappoint and thanks for that.

Nobody is beating anyone yet. Name one state where they are counting votes for each candidate. Not how many votes have been received by the state or precinct but votes for the candidates. I am pretty confident that you won't find one. You still haven't found any doctored documents from Wikileaks in response to this post.




You are looking pretty lame here.
Click to expand...

As usual, the standard issue "I'm winning because I say so" rhetoric.

I have zero interest in digging through thousands of documents, especially when I don't have the necessary equipment to detirmine whether or not it has been doctored. Taking anything on faith like you take WikiLeaks is stupid, however.

What was the percentage likelyhood of victory for Trump again? 18%?

It's fairly safe to say that Trump is losing.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Still crimes.
Click to expand...

Look. I'm not a mind reader. If you have a point to make...one you think I should be interested in...you are going to have to make it instead of these cryptic two-worded posts that make no sense to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom